The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Non-Abelian Berry connections for quantum computation
Open accessAbstract
In the holonomic approach to quantum computation, information is encoded in a degenerate eigenspace of a parametric family of Hamiltonians and manipulated by the associated holonomic gates. These are realized in terms of the non-Abelian Berry connection and are obtained by driving the control parameters along adiabatic loops. We show how it is possible for a specific model to explicitly determine the loops generating any desired logical gate, thus producing a universal set of unitary transformations. In a multipartite system unitary transformations can be implemented efficiently by sequences of local holonomic gates. Moreover, a conceptual scheme for obtaining the required Hamiltonian family, based on frequently repeated pulses, is discussed, together with a possible process whereby the initial state can be prepared and the final one can be measured.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Davies did not consider time-dependent system Hamiltonians in [43], but it is possible to generalize his derivation to allow for slowly varying system Hamiltonians [37, 44, 45]. That is, whenever the time scale of the variation of H C ( t ) is much longer than the inverse of the typical Bohr frequency (of H S ), it is possible to add H C ( t ) to the system Hamiltonian in Eq. (23), necessitating a”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamical Decoupling of Open Quantum Systems
Viola, L., Knill, E., & Lloyd, S. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.2417 · Cited by 1,808
Appearance of Gauge Structure in Simple Dynamical Systems
Wilczek, F., & Zee, A. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.2111 · Cited by 1,775
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.255 · Cited by 1,651
Geometry, Topology and Physics
Nakahara, M. (1990) · doi:10.1887/0750306068 · Cited by 1,620
Steane, A. (1998) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/61/2/002 · Cited by 1,391
Two-bit gates are universal for quantum computation
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.51.1015 · Cited by 1,069
Introduction to Quantum Computation and Information
Lo, H.-K., Spiller, T. P., & Popescu, S. (1998) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/9789812385253 · Cited by 488
Universality in quantum computation
Deutsch, D. E., Barenco, A., & Ekert, A. (1995) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1995.0065 · Cited by 346
Zanardi, P. (1999) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(99)00365-5 · Cited by 319
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- T.T. Wu, 1975, Phys. Rev. D, 12, 3845
- R. Jackiw, 1984, Relativity Groups and Topology, Les Houches 1983
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 315
Yang, S., & Hwang, N. Y. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.125330 · Cited by 26
Tanimura, S., Nakahara, M., & Hayashi, D. (2005) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1835545 · Cited by 30
Influence from cavity decay on geometric quantum computation in the large-detuning cavity QED model
Chen, C., Zhang, X., Deng, Z. J., Gao, K., & Feng, M. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.032328 · Cited by 26
Note on Coherent States and Adiabatic Connections, Curvatures
Fujii, K. (2000) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 25
Geometric driving of two-level quantum systems
Ying, Z.-J., Gentile, P., Baltanás, J. P., Frustaglia, D., Ortix, C., & Cuoco, M. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023167 · Cited by 28
Geometric phase in supersymmetric quantum mechanics
Pedder, C., Sonner, J., & Tong, D. (2008) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.025009 · Cited by 26
Geometric phase for N -level systems through unitary integration
Uskov, D. B., & Rau, A. R. P. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.030304 · Cited by 22
Herzberg circuit and Berry's phase in chirality-based coded qubit in a triangular triple quantum dot
Hsieh, C., René, A., & Hawrylak, P. (2012) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.115312 · Cited by 23
Robust and fast geometric quantum computation with multiqubit gates in cavity QED
Lin, G., Zou, X., Lin, X., & Guo, G. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.064303 · Cited by 21
Holonomic quantum computing based on the Stark effect
Bernevig, B. A., & Zhang, S. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.035303 · Cited by 21
Quantum holonomies with Josephson-junction devices
Cholascinski, M. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.134516 · Cited by 21
Xiao, Y., Kang, Y., Zheng, R., Song, J., Chen, Y., & Xia, Y. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.062610 · Cited by 23
Measuring Quantum Geometric Tensor of Non-Abelian System in Superconducting Circuits
Zheng, W., Xu, J., Ma, Z., Li, Y., Dong, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Sun, G., Wu, P., Zhao, J., et al. (2022) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/39/10/100202 · Cited by 22
Fast and Robust Geometric Two-Qubit Gates for Superconducting Qubits and beyond
Setiawan, F., Groszkowski, P., & Clerk, A. A. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.19.034071 · Cited by 24
Nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation with trapped ions
Li, X.-Q., Cen, L.-X., Huang, G., Ма, Л., & Yan, Y. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.042320 · Cited by 22
FROM GEOMETRY TO QUANTUM COMPUTATION
Fujii, K. (2002) · International Symposium on Quantum Theory and Symmetries (QTS) · doi:10.1142/9789812777850_0040 · Cited by 24
Self-protected quantum algorithms based on quantum state tomography
Wu, L.-A., & Byrd, M. (2008) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-008-0090-9 · Cited by 21
Lindbladians with multiple steady states: theory and applicationsPreprint
Albert, V. V. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.00010 · Cited by 76
Quantum computation with cold bosonic atoms in an optical lattice
García‐Ripoll, J. J., & Cirac, J. I. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2003.1220 · Cited by 20
Universal control of quantum subspaces and subsystems
Zanardi, P., & Lloyd, S. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.022313 · Cited by 28
Adiabatically steered open quantum systems: Master equation and optimal phase
Salmilehto, J., Solinas, P., Ankerhold, J., & Möttönen, M. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.062112 · Cited by 19
Noncyclic Geometric Quantum Gates with Smooth Paths via Invariant‐Based Shortcuts
Ji, L., Ding, C., Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2021) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202100019 · Cited by 21
Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation and its optimal control
Liang, Y., Shen, P., Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2023) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-023-3824-0 · Cited by 19
Non-Abelian Holonomy in Degenerate Non-Hermitian Systems
Shan, Z., Sun, Y., Tao, R., Chen, Q., Tian, Z., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.053802 · Cited by 19
Quantum tunneling via quantum geometric phase
Wang, Z. S., Kwek, L. C., Lai, C. H., & Oh, C. H. (2006) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2006.07.071 · Cited by 19
Nonadiabatic geometric quantum gates that are insensitive to qubit-frequency drifts
Zhou, J., Li, S., Pan, G., Zhang, G., Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.032609 · Cited by 19
Setiawan, F., Groszkowski, P., Ribeiro, H., & Clerk, A. A. (2021) · University of Chicago · doi:10.6082/hfwax-5pa07 · Cited by 19
Zhang, J., Peng, X., Rajendran, N., & Suter, D. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.042314 · Cited by 18
Refocusing schemes for holonomic quantum computation in the presence of dissipation
Cen, L.-X., & Zanardi, P. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.052323 · Cited by 19
Engineered Open Systems and Quantum Simulations with Atoms and IonsPreprint
Müller, M., Diehl, S., Pupillo, G., & Zoller, P. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1203.6595 · Cited by 19
Operational geometric phase for mixed quantum states
Andersson, O., & Heydari, H. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/5/053006 · Cited by 18
Scheme for fault-tolerant holonomic computation on stabilizer codes
Oreshkov, O., Brun, T. A., & Lidar, D. A. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.022325 · Cited by 16
Geometric driving of two-level quantum systems
Ying, Z., Gentile, P., Baltanás, J. P., Frustaglia, D., Ortix, C., Cuoco, M., Theory, S. &. C. P. S. C.-M., & Physics, T. (2020) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 18
Geometric quantum computation on solid-state qubits
Choi, M. (2003) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/15/46/001 · Cited by 16
Non-Abelian gauge field in optics
Yan, Q., Wang, Z., Wang, D., Ma, R., Lu, C., Ma, G., Hu, X., & Gong, Q. (2023) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.494544 · Cited by 18
Noncyclic nonadiabatic geometric quantum gates in a superconducting circuit
Ma, Z., Xu, J., Chen, T., Zhang, Y., Zheng, W., Li, S., Lan, D., Xue, Z., Tan, X., & Yu, Y. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.20.054047 · Cited by 19
Non-Abelian Berry phase for open quantum systems: Topological protection versus geometric dephasing
Snizhko, K., Egger, R., & Gefen, Y. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.085303 · Cited by 16
Non-Abelian monopoles in the multiterminal Josephson effect
Xie, H.-Y., Hasan, J., & Levchenko, A. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.l241404 · Cited by 17
Exact solutions of holonomic quantum computation
Tanimura, S., Hayashi, D., & Nakahara, M. (2004) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2004.03.057 · Cited by 16
BASIC PROPERTIES OF COHERENT AND GENERALIZED COHERENT OPERATORS REVISITED
Fujii, K. (2001) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732301004492 · Cited by 16
Fast multiqubit Rydberg geometric fan-out gates with optimal control technology
Wei, J.-F., Guo, F.-Q., Wang, D.-Y., Jia, Y., Yan, L.-L., Feng, M., & Su, S. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.042404 · Cited by 16
Non-Abelian Geometric Dephasing
Snizhko, K., Egger, R., & Gefen, Y. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.060405 · Cited by 15
Highly degenerate photonic waveguide structures for holonomic computation
Pinske, J., Teuber, L., & Scheel, S. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.062314 · Cited by 17
Yun, M.-R., Guo, F.-Q., Yan, L.-L., Liang, E., Zhang, Y., Su, S., Shan, C., & Jia, Y. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.012611 · Cited by 16
Quantum computation using the Aharonov–Casher set up
Ericsson, M., & Sjöqvist, E. (2002) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(02)01235-5 · Cited by 17
Detecting unambiguously non-Abelian geometric phases with trapped ions
Zhang, X.-D., Wang, Z. D., Hu, L.-B., Zhang, Z.-M., & Zhu, S.-L. (2008) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/4/043031 · Cited by 16
Decoherence-suppressed nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation
Liu, B.-J., Yan, L.-L., Zhang, Y., Yung, M., Su, S., & Shan, C. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.013059 · Cited by 15
Control aspects of holonomic quantum computation
Lucarelli, D. (2005) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1888028 · Cited by 13
Tanimura, S., Nakahara, M., & Hayashi, D. (2004) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 15
Error-resistant distributed quantum computation in a trapped ion chain
Braungardt, S., Sen, A., Sen, U., & Lewenstein, M. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042307 · Cited by 17
Cavity-QED-based unconventional geometric phase gates with bichromatic field modes
Joshi, A., & Xiao, M. (2006) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2006.06.081 · Cited by 15
Sun, L.-N., Guo, F.-Q., Shan, Z., Feng, M., Yan, L.-L., & Su, S. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.062602 · Cited by 14
Geometric quantum gates via dark paths in Rydberg atoms
Jin, Z.-Y., & Jing, J. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.012619 · Cited by 16
Quantum entangling power of adiabatically connected Hamiltonians
Hamma, A., & Zanardi, P. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.062319 · Cited by 14
Efficient quantum processing of three-manifold topological invariants
Garnerone, S., Marzuoli, A., & Rasetti, M. (2009) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.2009.v13.n6.a1 · Cited by 21
Self-citationDeduction, Computation, Experiment
Lupacchini, R., & Corsi, G. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-88-470-0784-0 · Cited by 25
Scalable nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation on a superconducting qubit lattice
Ji, L., Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.062312 · Cited by 13
THE QUANTUM TRAJECTORY APPROACH TO GEOMETRIC PHASE FOR OPEN SYSTEMS
Carollo, A. C. M. (2005) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732305017718 · Cited by 13
Laing, A., Lawson, T., López, E. M., & O’Brien, J. L. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.260505 · Cited by 12
HQC with the AC setup associated with topological defects
Bakke, K., & Furtado, C. (2011) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic11.5-6-6 · Cited by 15
Akulin, V. M., Gershkovich, V., & Harel, G. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.012308 · Cited by 14
Feedback control on geometric phase in dissipative two-level systems
Sun, H. Y., Shu, P. L., Li, C., & Yi, X. X. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.022119 · Cited by 13
Time-optimal holonomic quantum computation
Alves, G. O. (2022) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 13
High-fidelity geometric quantum gates exceeding 99.9% in germanium quantum dots
Zhou, Y.-C., Ma, R.-L., Kong, Z., Li, A.-R., Zhang, C., Zhang, X., Liu, Y., Jiang, H.-T., Wu, Z., Wang, G., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63241-4 · Cited by 13
Two-Qubit Geometric Gates Based on Ground-State Blockade of Rydberg Atoms
Xu, J.-Z., Sun, L.-N., Wei, J.-F., Du, Y.-X., Luo, R., Yan, L.-L., Feng, M., & Su, S. (2022) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/39/9/090301 · Cited by 12
Nonadiabatic geometric quantum gates by composite pulses based on superconducting qubits
Fang, Z.-Y., Xu, H. L., Chen, T., Wei, K., & Zhang, C. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.042615 · Cited by 12
Weak-measurement-induced phases and dephasing: Broken symmetry of the geometric phase
Snizhko, K., Rao, N., Kumar, P., & Gefen, Y. (2021) · Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) · doi:10.5445/ir/1000142527 · Cited by 12
A general treatment of geometric phases and dynamical invariants
Duzzioni, E. I., Serra, R. M., & Moussa, M. H. Y. (2008) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/82/20007 · Cited by 12
Mathematical Structure of Rabi Oscillations in the Strong Coupling RegimePreprint
Fujii, K. (2002) · Cited by 13
Lower Bound of Minimal Time Evolution in Quantum Mechanics
Giri, P. R. (2008) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-008-9650-0 · Cited by 9
Weyl disks: Theoretical prediction
Erdmanis, J., Lukács, Á., & Nazarov, Y. V. (2018) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.241105 · Cited by 14
Nonadiabatic Holonomic Quantum Computation via Path Optimization
Ji, L., Liang, Y., Shen, P., & Xue, Z. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.044034 · Cited by 10
Measuring Berry curvature with quantum Monte Carlo
Kolodrubetz, M. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.045107 · Cited by 10
Optical rotation of heavy hole spins by non-Abelian geometrical means
Sun, H., Feng, X., Wu, C., Liu, J., Gong, S., & Oh, C. H. (2009) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.235404 · Cited by 11
Avoiding Loss of Fidelity for Universal Entangling Geometric Quantum Gate
Chen, Z., Wang, J. Q., Li, X. L., Ji, Y., Zhang, B., Jiang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2009) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-009-0082-2 · Cited by 10
Kang, Y., Chen, Y., Shi, Z., Huang, B., Song, J., & Xia, Y. (2019) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201800427 · Cited by 10
Error-Tolerant Geometric Quantum Control for Logical Qubits with Minimal Resources
Chen, T., Xue, Z., & Wang, Z. D. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.014062 · Cited by 9
Mixed-state non-Abelian holonomy for subsystems
Nordling, M., & Sjöqvist, E. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.012110 · Cited by 7
Manifestations of quantum holonomy in interferometry
Sjöqvist, E., Kult, D., & Åberg, J. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.062101 · Cited by 9
Control of many-electron states in semiconductor quantum dots by non-Abelian vector potentials
Yang, S. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.245328 · Cited by 9
Geometry and speed of evolution for a spin- s system with long-range zz -type Ising interaction
Krynytskyi, Y. S., & Kuzmak, A. R. (2019) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2019.03.006 · Cited by 8
Berry-phase-based quantum gates assisted by transitionless quantum driving
Qi, S.-F., & Jing, J. (2020) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.381706 · Cited by 9
Weak-measurement-induced phases and dephasing: Broken symmetry of the geometric phase
Snizhko, K., Rao, N., Kumar, P., & Gefen, Y. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.043045 · Cited by 11
Quantum computation using the Aharonov-Casher set up
Ericsson, M., & Sjöqvist, E. (2002) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 9
Implementation of adiabatic geometric gates with superconducting phase qubits
Peng, Z., Chu, H. F., Wang, Z. D., & Zheng, D. (2008) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/21/4/045701 · Cited by 7
Geometric Phase in Eigenspace Evolution of Invariant and Adiabatic Action Operators
Teo, J. C. Y., & Wang, Z. D. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.050406 · Cited by 7
Goto, H., & Ichimura, K. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.012120 · Cited by 8
More on Optical Holonomic Quantum ComputerPreprint
Fujii, K. (2000) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0005129 · Cited by 11
Guo, L.-J., Xu, H. L., Fang, Z.-Y., Chen, T., Wei, K., & Zhang, C. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.012604 · Cited by 8
Robust Hadamard gate for optical and ion trap holonomic quantum computers
Кувшинов, В. И., & Kuzmin, A. V. (2005) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2005.05.008 · Cited by 7
Adiabatic graph-state quantum computation
Antonio, B., Markham, D., & Anders, J. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/113070 · Cited by 8
Zhang, K., Nusran, N., Slezak, B. R., & Dutt, M. V. G. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/5/053029 · Cited by 7
Geometric quantum phase for displaced states for a particle with an induced electric dipole moment
de Melo, J. L., Bakke, K., & Furtado, C. (2016) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/115/20001 · Cited by 8
Implementation of Geometric Quantum Gates on Microwave‐Driven Semiconductor Charge Qubits
Zhang, C., Chen, T., Wang, X., & Xue, Z. (2021) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202100011 · Cited by 8
Robust nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation by dynamical correction
Liang, M.-J., & Xue, Z. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.012603 · Cited by 8
Entanglement gauge and the non-Abelian geometric phase with two photonic qubits
Marzlin, K.-P., Bartlett, S. D., & Sanders, B. C. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.022316 · Cited by 8
Geometrical Rabi oscillations and Landau-Zener transitions in non-Abelian systems
Weisbrich, H., Rastelli, G., & Belzig, W. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033122 · Cited by 9
Geometrical phases for the G(4,2) Grassmannian manifold
Karle, R., & Pachos, J. K. (2003) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1572551 · Cited by 5
Self-citationNonadiabatic geometric phase induced by a counterpart of the Stark shift
Duzzioni, E. I., Villas-Bôas, C. J., Mizrahi, S. S., Moussa, M. H. Y., & Serra, R. M. (2005) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/epl/i2005-10209-9 · Cited by 8
Non-Abelian generalization of off-diagonal geometric phases
Kult, D., Åberg, J., & Sjöqvist, E. (2007) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/78/60004 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Pachos, J., Zanardi, P., & Rasetti, M.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Scientific Interchange (IT)
- ORCID
- Pachos, Jiannis
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1999-12-13
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W1965228711
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 12.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
- PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- holonomic quantum computation, universal gate set, multipartite systems, state preparation and measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
