Quantum computing
Open accessAbstract
The subject of quantum computing brings together ideas from classical information theory, computer science, and quantum physics. This review aims to summarize not just quantum computing, but the whole subject of quantum information theory. Information can be identified as the most general thing which must propagate from a cause to an effect. It therefore has a fundamentally important role in the science of physics. However, the mathematical treatment of information, especially information processing, is quite recent, dating from the mid-20th century. This has meant that the full significance of information as a basic concept in physics is only now being discovered. This is especially true in quantum mechanics. The theory of quantum information and computing puts this significance on a firm footing, and has led to some profound and exciting new insights into the natural world. Among these are the use of quantum states to permit the secure transmission of classical information (quantum cryptography), the use of quantum entanglement to permit reliable transmission of quantum states (teleportation), the possibility of preserving quantum coherence in the presence of irreversible noise processes (quantum error correction), and the use of controlled quantum evolution for efficient computation (quantum computation). The common theme of all these insights is the use of quantum entanglement as a computational resource. It turns out that information theory and quantum mechanics fit together very well. In order to explain their relationship, this review begins with an introduction to classical information theory and computer science, including Shannon's theorem, error correcting codes, Turing machines and computational complexity. The principles of quantum mechanics are then outlined, and the Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) experiment described. The EPR-Bell correlations, and quantum entanglement in general, form the essential new ingredient which distinguishes quantum from classical information theory and, arguably, quantum from classical physics. Basic quantum information ideas are next outlined, including qubits and data compression, quantum gates, the `no cloning' property and teleportation. Quantum cryptography is briefly sketched. The universal quantum computer (QC) is described, based on the Church-Turing principle and a network model of computation. Algorithms for such a computer are discussed, especially those for finding the period of a function, and searching a random list. Such algorithms prove that a QC of sufficiently precise construction is not only fundamentally different from any computer which can only manipulate classical information, but can compute a small class of functions with greater efficiency. This implies that some important computational tasks are impossible for any device apart from a QC. To build a universal QC is well beyond the abilities of current technology. However, the principles of quantum information physics can be tested on smaller devices. The current experimental situation is reviewed, with emphasis on the linear ion trap, high- Q optical cavities, and nuclear magnetic resonance methods. These allow coherent control in a Hilbert space of eight dimensions (three qubits) and should be extendable up to a thousand or more dimensions (10 qubits). Among other things, these systems will allow the feasibility of quantum computing to be assessed. In fact such experiments are so difficult that it seemed likely until recently that a practically useful QC (requiring, say, 1000 qubits) was actually ruled out by considerations of experimental imprecision and the unavoidable coupling between any system and its environment. However, a further fundamental part of quantum information physics provides a solution to this impasse. This is quantum error correction (QEC). An introduction to QEC is provided. The evolution of the QC is restricted to a carefully chosen subspace of its Hilbert space. Errors are almost certain to cause a departure from this subspace. QEC provides a means to detect and undo such departures without upsetting the quantum computation. This achieves the apparently impossible, since the computation preserves quantum coherence even though during its course all the qubits in the computer will have relaxed spontaneously many times. The review concludes with an outline of the main features of quantum information physics and avenues for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Quantum computers use superposition and entanglement to perform complex computations more efficiently or exponentially faster than classical computers.
“Quantum computers use superposition and entanglement to perform complex computations more efficiently or “exponentially” faster than classical computers (Steane, 1998).”
From Quantum technology for development framework as a tool for science diplomacy (2023) · cites this paper as Steane, 1998
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654 · see citing works
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703 · see citing works
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252 · see citing works
Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem
Ekert, A. K. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.661 · Cited by 10,777 · see citing works
Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer
Shor, P. W. (1997) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539795293172 · Cited by 8,472 · see citing works
Simulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691 · see citing works
Quantum computation with quantum dots
Loss, D., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.120 · Cited by 6,840 · see citing works
A single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406 · see citing works
Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer
Deutsch, D. (1985) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1985.0070 · Cited by 4,597 · see citing works
Elementary gates for quantum computation
Barenco, A., Bennett, C. H., Cleve, R., DiVincenzo, D. P., Margolus, N., Shor, P., Sleator, T., Smolin, J. A., & Weinfurter, H. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.3457 · Cited by 4,311 · see citing works
Quantum Mechanics Helps in Searching for a Needle in a Haystack
Grover, L. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.325 · Cited by 4,306 · see citing works
Quantum Computations with Cold Trapped Ions
Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4091 · Cited by 3,733 · see citing works
Lloyd, S. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5278.1073 · Cited by 3,088 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Some work has been done on simulating Hamiltonians on quantum computers [1, 24, 33], but I do not believe this question has been completely addressed yet.”
Good quantum error-correcting codes exist
Calderbank, A. R., & Shor, P. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1098 · Cited by 2,516 · see citing works
Quantum State Transfer and Entanglement Distribution among Distant Nodes in a Quantum Network
Cirac, J. I., Zoller, P., Kimble, H. J., & Mabuchi, H. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.3221 · Cited by 2,215 · see citing works
Feynman, R. P. (1986) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01886518 · Cited by 1,770 · see citing works
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.255 · Cited by 1,651 · see citing works
Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions
Wineland, D. J., Monroe, C., Itano, W. M., Leibfried, D., King, B. E., & Meekhof, D. M. (1998) · Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology · doi:10.6028/jres.103.019 · Cited by 1,497 · see citing works
Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantum Computing
Bennett, C. H., Bernstein, E., Brassard, G., & Vazirani, U. (1997) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539796300933 · Cited by 1,470 · see citing works
Dense Coding in Experimental Quantum Communication
Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Kwiat, P. G., & Zeilinger, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.4656 · Cited by 1,342 · see citing works
Bernstein, E., & Vazirani, U. (1993) · Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '93 · doi:10.1145/167088.167097 · Cited by 1,284 · see citing works
Benioff, P. (1980) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01011339 · Cited by 1,244 · see citing works
Class of quantum error-correcting codes saturating the quantum Hamming bound
Gottesman, D. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1862 · Cited by 1,227 · see citing works
Quantum computers and dissipation
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1996.0029 · Cited by 899 · see citing works
Quantum Error Correction and Orthogonal Geometry
Calderbank, A. R., Rains, E. M., Shor, P. W., & Sloane, N. J. A. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.405 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
Simple quantum error-correcting codes
Steane, A. M. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.4741 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum mechanical Hamiltonian models of Turing machines
Benioff, P. (1982) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01342185 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
A New Proof of the Quantum Noiseless Coding Theorem
Jozsa, R., & Schumacher, B. (1994) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500349414552191 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Quantum Computers, Factoring, and Decoherence
Chuang, I. L., Laflamme, R., Shor, P. W., & Zurek, W. H. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5242.1633 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Efficient networks for quantum factoring
Beckman, D., Chari, A. N., Devabhaktuni, S., & Preskill, J. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1034 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Structural basis of multistationary quantum systems. II. Effective few-particle dynamics
Teich, W. G., Obermayer, K., & Mahler, G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.8111 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Machine learning for molecular and materials science
Butler, K. T., Davies, D. W., Cartwright, H., Isayev, O., & Walsh, A. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 · Cited by 4,968 · see citing works
A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer
Kane, B. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30156 · Cited by 3,779 · see citing works
Quantum Information Processing Using Quantum Dot Spins and Cavity QED
Imamog¯lu, A., Awschalom, D. D., Burkard, G., DiVincenzo, D. P., Loss, D., Sherwin, M., & Small, A. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.4204 · Cited by 1,995 · see citing works
Fast Quantum Gates for Neutral Atoms
Jaksch, D., Cirac, J. I., Zoller, P., Rolston, S. L., Côté, R., & Lukin, M. D. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.2208 · Cited by 1,540 · see citing works
NMR techniques for quantum control and computation
Vandersypen, L. M. K., & Chuang, I. L. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.1037 · Cited by 1,217 · see citing works
Zanardi, P., & Rasetti, M. (1999) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(99)00803-8 · Cited by 1,006 · see citing works
Dynamics of Loschmidt echoes and fidelity decay
Gorin, T., Prosen, T., Seligman, T. H., & Žnidarič, M. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.09.003 · Cited by 623 · see citing works
Quantum entanglement in fermionic lattices
Zanardi, P. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.042101 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Optimal creation of entanglement using a two-qubit gate
Kraus, B., & Cirac, J. I. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.63.062309 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Entangling power of quantum evolutions
Zanardi, P., Zalka, C., & Faoro, L. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.62.030301 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Coherent Manipulation of Atoms Molecules By Sequential Laser Pulses
Vitanov, N. V., Fleischhauer, M., Shore, B. W., & Bergmann, K. (2001) · Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics · doi:10.1016/s1049-250x(01)80063-x · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Non-Abelian Berry connections for quantum computation
Pachos, J., Zanardi, P., & Rasetti, M. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.010305 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Cooling the Collective Motion of Trapped Ions to Initialize a Quantum Register
King, B. E., Wood, C. S., Myatt, C. J., Turchette, Q. A., Leibfried, D., Itano, W. M., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. J. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.1525 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Stabilizing quantum information
Zanardi, P. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.63.012301 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Imany, P., Jaramillo-Villegas, J. A., Odele, O. D., Han, K., Leaird, D. E., Lukens, J. M., Lougovski, P., Qi, M., & Weiner, A. M. (2018) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.26.001825 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Fermionic entanglement in itinerant systems
Zanardi, P., & Wang, X. (2002) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/35/37/307 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Deterministic entanglement of ions in thermal states of motion
Kirchmair, G., Benhelm, J., Zähringer, F., Gerritsma, R., Roos, C. F., & Blatt, R. (2009) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/2/023002 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Quantum mechanics, interference, and the brain
Acacio de Barros, J., & Suppes, P. (2009) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2009.03.005 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Calculating the thermal rate constant with exponential speedup on a quantum computer
Lidar, D. A., & Wang, H. (1999) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.59.2429 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Quantum technology for development framework as a tool for science diplomacy
Mafu, M., & Senekane, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2023.1279376 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“SDG 1–2 and SDGs 11–15: Quantum computers use superposition and entanglement to perform complex computations more efficiently or “exponentially” faster than classical computers (Steane, 1998).”
Towards a Possible Definition of Consciousness
Vitas, M. (2025) · BioSystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2025.105526 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Steane, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Steane, Andrew
- ORCID
- Steane, Andrew
- Venue
- Reports on Progress in Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1998-02-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-173
- ISSN
- 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6633
- OpenAlex
- W3037315640
- Cited by
- 1,391
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 111.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Reports on Progress in Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- quantum computing, quantum information, quantum entanglement, quantum cryptography, quantum teleportation, quantum error correction, qubits, no-cloning theorem, quantum gates, quantum algorithms, Shor's algorithm, Grover's algorithm, computational complexity, linear ion trap, optical resonators, nuclear magnetic resonance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review