CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 47

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Three-photon Hong–Ou–Mandel interference at a multiport mixer

Campos, Richard A.·2000·Physical Review A
DOI 10.1103/physreva.62.013809
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We consider a six-port triangular arrangement of beam splitters designed to couple three electromagnetic fields through U(3) unitary transformations. We present conditions for Hong-Ou-Mandel destructive interference of output triple coincidences when single photons are presented, one at each of the three input ports. Unlike the corresponding four-port effect, three-photon Hong-Ou-Mandel interference is sensitive to mixer phases and input-output port reversal.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.62.013809

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Boson sampling challenges the extended Church-Turing thesis.

    “In addition, it is also suggested that this challenges a fundamental principle of computer science, namely the extended Church-Turing thesis.”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [167]

  • Calculating the output probability distribution for a sufficiently large number of photons interfering in a large multiport arrangement is exponentially hard to solve classically.

    “It has been shown that calculating the output probability distribution for a sufficiently large number of photons interfering in a large multiport arrangement is exponentially hard to solve classically”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [167]

  • Boson sampling is considered a promising candidate to show quantum supremacy.

    “and as such it is considered to be a promising candidate to show quantum supremacy.”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [167]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. L. Mandel, 1999, Rev. Mod. Phys., 71, S274, 10.1103/RevModPhys.71.S274 · DOI
  2. J. Brendel, 1988, Europhys. Lett., 5, 223, 10.1209/0295-5075/5/3/007 · DOI
  3. R. Lange, 1988, Europhys. Lett., 619, 10.1209/0295-5075/5/7/008 · DOI
  4. R. A. Campos, 1989, Phys. Rev. A, 40, 1371, 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.1371 · DOI
  5. Z. Y. Ou, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 959, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.959 · DOI
  6. Z. Y. Ou, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 60, 593, 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.593 · DOI
  7. Th. Richter, 1990, Phys. Rev. A, 42, 1817, 10.1103/PhysRevA.42.1817 · DOI
  8. Th. Richter, 1991, Quantum Opt., 3, 115, 10.1088/0954-8998/3/2/004 · DOI
  9. D. M. Greenberger, 1993, Phys. Today, 46, 22, 10.1063/1.881360 · DOI
  10. M. Reck, 1994, Phys. Rev. Lett., 73, 58, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58 · DOI · Paper page
  11. G. A. Baker, Jr., 1956, Phys. Rev., 103, 1119, 10.1103/PhysRev.103.1119 · DOI
  12. A. V. Burlakov, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 60, R4209, 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.R4209 · DOI · Paper page
  13. I. Jex, 1995, Opt. Commun., 117, 95, 10.1016/0030-4018(95)00078-M · DOI
  14. M. Zukowski, 1997, Phys. Rev. A, 55, 2564, 10.1103/PhysRevA.55.2564 · DOI · Paper page
  15. B. Yurke, 1986, Phys. Rev. A, 33, 4033, 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.4033 · DOI
  16. S. Prasad, 1987, Opt. Commun., 62, 139, 10.1016/0030-4018(87)90015-0 · DOI
  17. Z. Y. Ou, 1987, Opt. Commun., 118, 10.1016/0030-4018(87)90271-9 · DOI · Paper page
  18. H. Fearn, 1987, Opt. Commun., 485, 10.1016/0030-4018(87)90275-6 · DOI
  19. B. Huttner, 1988, Phys. Rev. A, 38, 204, 10.1103/PhysRevA.38.204 · DOI
  20. Z. Y. Ou, 1989, Am. J. Phys., 57, 66, 10.1119/1.15873 · DOI
  21. H. Fearn, 1989, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 6, 917, 10.1364/JOSAB.6.000917 · DOI
  22. W. K. Lai, 1991, Phys. Rev. A, 43, 6323, 10.1103/PhysRevA.43.6323 · DOI · Paper page
  23. U. Leonhardt, 1993, Phys. Rev. A, 3265, 10.1103/PhysRevA.48.3265 · DOI
  24. A. Luis, 1995, Quantum Semiclassic. Opt., 7, 153, 10.1088/1355-5111/7/2/005 · DOI
  25. K. Jacobs, 1996, Phys. Rev. A, 54, R3738, 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.R3738 · DOI
  26. M. W. Hamilton, 2000, Am. J. Phys., 68, 186, 10.1119/1.19393 · DOI · Paper page
  27. T. J. Nelson, 1968, Am. J. Phys., 36, 791, 10.1119/1.1975150 · DOI
  28. M. Gell-Mann, 1962, Phys. Rev., 125, 1067, 10.1103/PhysRev.125.1067 · DOI
  29. A. Zeilinger, 1997, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 3031, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3031 · DOI · Paper page
  30. J. Pan, 2000, Nature (London), 403, 515, 10.1038/35000514 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Campos, R. A.
Venue
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2000-06-14
Volume
62
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
DOI
10.1103/physreva.62.013809
Cited by
47
References
2
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review