Cited by 1,209Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographySemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices

Experimental test of quantum nonlocality in three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement

Pan, Jian-Wei, Bouwmeester, Dik, Daniell, Matthew, Weinfurter, Harald, Zeilinger, Anton·2000·Nature

Abstract

Bell's theorem states that certain statistical correlations predicted by quantum physics for measurements on two-particle systems cannot be understood within a realistic picture based on local properties of each individual particle-even if the two particles are separated by large distances. Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen first recognized the fundamental significance of these quantum correlations (termed 'entanglement' by Schrodinger) and the two-particle quantum predictions have found ever-increasing experimental support. A more striking conflict between quantum mechanical and local realistic predictions (for perfect correlations) has been discovered; but experimental verification has been difficult, as it requires entanglement between at least three particles. Here we report experimental confirmation of this conflict, using our recently developed method to observe three-photon entanglement, or 'Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger' (GHZ) states. The results of three specific experiments, involving measurements of polarization correlations between three photons, lead to predictions for a fourth experiment; quantum physical predictions are mutually contradictory with expectations based on local realism. We find the results of the fourth experiment to be in agreement with the quantum prediction and in striking conflict with local realism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/35000514

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first laboratory test of the GHZ-type paradox was done by Pan et al. (2000).

    “The first laboratory test of the GHZ-type paradox was done by Pan et al. (2000).”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Pan et al. (2000)

  • The data from Pan et al. (2000), in the form of imperfect GHZ correlations, violated local realism.

    “The obtained data in the form of the (necessarily imperfect) GHZ correlations was shown to violate local realism.”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Pan et al. (2000)

  • The fourth experiment measuring x1x2x3 in Pan et al. (2000) also agreed with quantum mechanics for the same fraction of events.

    “The fourth experiment, measuring x1 x2 x3 , also was performed, and yielded results as shown in Fig. 18.The data again agree with quantum mechanics for the same fraction of events.”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Pan et al. (2000)

  • In Pan et al. (2000), the measured values for x1ŷ2ŷ3, ŷ1x2ŷ3, and ŷ1ŷ2x3 followed quantum predictions in a fraction 0.85 ± 0.04 of all cases.

    “In the experiment by Pan et al. (2000) the measured values for x1 ŷ2 ŷ3 , ŷ1 x2 ŷ3 , and ŷ1 ŷ2 x3 followed the values predicted by quantum physics in a fraction of 0.85 ± 0.04 of all cases.”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Pan et al. (2000)

  • The results of Pan et al. (2000) are in clear disagreement with a local realistic prediction range made from the first three measurements.

    “The results are in a clear disagreement with a prediction range that can be made with the data of the three first measurements using a local realistic model.”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Pan et al. (2000)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pan, J.-W., Bouwmeester, D., Daniell, M., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Zeilinger, Anton
Venue
Nature
Published
2000-02
Volume
403
Issue
6769
Pages
515-519
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2037757747
Cited by
1,209
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 53
FWCI
36.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Keywords
quantum nonlocality, Bell's theorem, local realism, GHZ states, three-photon entanglement, polarization correlation, quantum correlations, local hidden variable theories

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review