The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gaussian measures of entanglement versus negativities: Ordering of two-mode Gaussian states
Open accessAbstract
We study the entanglement of general (pure or mixed) two-mode Gaussian states of continuous-variable systems by comparing the two available classes of computable measures of entanglement: entropy-inspired Gaussian convex-roof measures and positive partial transposition--inspired measures (negativity and logarithmic negativity). We first review the formalism of Gaussian measures of entanglement, adopting the framework introduced in M. M. Wolf et al., Phys. Rev. A 69, 052320 (2004), where the Gaussian entanglement of formation was defined. We compute explicitly Gaussian measures of entanglement for two important families of nonsymmetric two-mode Gaussian state: namely, the states of extremal (maximal and minimal) negativities at fixed global and local purities, introduced in G. Adesso et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 087901 (2004). This analysis allows us to compare the different orderings induced on the set of entangled two-mode Gaussian states by the negativities and by the Gaussian measures of entanglement. We find that in a certain range of values of the global and local purities (characterizing the covariance matrix of the corresponding extremal states), states of minimum negativity can have more Gaussian entanglement of formation than states of maximum negativity. Consequently, Gaussian measures and negativities are definitely inequivalent measures of entanglement on nonsymmetric two-mode Gaussian states, even when restricted to a class of extremal states. On the other hand, the two families of entanglement measures are completely equivalent on symmetric states, for which the Gaussian entanglement of formation coincides with the true entanglement of formation. Finally, we show that the inequivalence between the two families of continuous-variable entanglement measures is somehow limited. Namely, we rigorously prove that, at fixed negativities, the Gaussian measures of entanglement are bounded from below. Moreover, we provide some strong evidence suggesting that they are as well bounded from above.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Wootters, W. K. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245 · Cited by 8,290
Quantum information with continuous variables
Braunstein, S. L., & van Loock, P. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.513 · Cited by 3,858
Unconditional Quantum Teleportation
Furusawa, A., Sørensen, J. L., Braunstein, S. L., Fuchs, C. A., Kimble, H. J., & Polzik, E. S. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5389.706 · Cited by 3,005
Peres-Horodecki Separability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems
Simon, R. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2726 · Cited by 2,245
Inseparability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems
Duan, L.-M., Giedke, G., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2722 · Cited by 2,064
Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex
Plenio, M. B. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.090503 · Cited by 1,530
Methods in Theoretical Quantum Optics
Barnett, S. M., & Radmore, P. M. (2002) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198563617.001.0001 · Cited by 1,211
Cited by
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 · Cited by 10,118
Entanglement in many-body systems
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., & Vedral, V. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.517 · Cited by 3,745
Continuous Variable Quantum Information: Gaussian States and Beyond
Adesso, G., Ragy, S., & Lee, A. R. (2014) · Open Systems & Information Dynamics · doi:10.1142/s1230161214400010 · Cited by 787
Self-citationEntanglement in continuous-variable systems: recent advances and current perspectives
Adesso, G., & Illuminati, F. (2007) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/28/s01 · Cited by 744
Self-citationMultiphoton quantum optics and quantum state engineering
Dell’Anno, F., De Siena, S., & Illuminati, F. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.01.004 · Cited by 310
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Adesso, G., & Illuminati, F.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-09-28
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W1792516231
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 10.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gaussian measures of entanglement versus negativities: Ordering of two-mode Gaussian states. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.72.032334
- The paper
- Adesso, G., & Illuminati, F. (2005). Gaussian measures of entanglement versus negativities: Ordering of two-mode Gaussian states. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.72.032334
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.