Cited by 2,245Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Peres-Horodecki Separability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems

Open access
Simon, R.·2000·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The Peres-Horodecki criterion of positivity under partial transpose is studied in the context of separability of bipartite continuous variable states. The partial transpose operation admits, in the continuous case, a geometric interpretation as mirror reflection in phase space. This recognition leads to uncertainty principles, stronger than the traditional ones, to be obeyed by all separable states. For all bipartite Gaussian states, the Peres-Horodecki criterion turns out to be a necessary and sufficient condition for separability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.84.2726

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In steady state, none of the approaches generate entanglement; the two-mode Gaussian state is separable according to the separability criterion for continuous variable systems.

    “It should be noted that in steady state none of the approaches generate entanglement.The two-mode Gaussian state is a separable state according to the separability criterion for continuous variable systems [22,23].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simon, R.
Affiliations
Institute of Mathematical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Simon, R.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2000-03-20
Volume
84
Issue
12
Pages
2726-2729
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2161482522
Cited by
2,245
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 81 · 2025: 134 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 153 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 128 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 88 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 69
FWCI
49.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
Peres-Horodecki criterion, separability, continuous-variable systems, partial transposition, specular reflection, phase space, uncertainty principle, Gaussian states, bipartite states, quantum entanglement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review