CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum random walks and wave-packet reshaping at the single-photon level

Souto Ribeiro, P. H., Walborn, S. P., Raitz, C., Davidovich, L., Zagury, N.·2008·Physical Review A
DOI 10.1103/physreva.78.012326
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We realize an experimental implementation of one step of a quantum random walk at the single-photon level. After a single step, it is already possible to observe the difference between the quantum and classical random walk. The single photon is obtained using twin photons from parametric down-conversion, in which the detection of one photon of the idler prepares a single-photon state of the signal. We used two different experimental setups, one based on an interferometer and a second using a birefringent crystal. The physical process behind these effects is the spatial reshaping of the single-photon wave packet, which is the spatial analog of the time reshaping observed in tunneling experiments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.78.012326

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Photonic states with n = 2 photons exhibit more complex interference patterns.

    “the full landscape of phenomena gets enriched if we consider photonic states with n = 2 photons [16,17,51,128,146,516,518,532,533,537,538,540,541,544], thanks to the emergence of more complex interference patterns [516,544]”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [544]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1080/00107151031000110776 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRev.144.1071 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1107 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.052327 · DOI
  5. P. Kwait, 2000, J. Mod. Opt., 47, 257, 10.1080/09500340008244040 · DOI
  6. 10.1023/A:1018703709245 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.062302 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.137901 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.042319 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.012310 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1088/1464-4266/7/9/009 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.optcom.2006.07.022 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevA.52.32 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.708 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1351 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1126/science.1139892 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.1152697 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.3123 · DOI
  19. Bahaa E. A. Saleh, 1991, Fundamentals of Photonics, 10.1002/0471213748 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Souto Ribeiro, P. H., Walborn, S. P., Raitz, C., Davidovich, L., & Zagury, N.
Venue
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2008-07-15
Volume
78
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
DOI
10.1103/physreva.78.012326
Cited by
17
References
7
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review