The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental criteria for steering and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
Open accessAbstract
We formally link the concept of steering (a concept created by Schr\"odinger but only recently formalized by Wiseman, Jones, and Doherty [Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140402 (2007)]) and the criteria for demonstrations of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox introduced by Reid [Phys. Rev. A 40, 913 (1989)]. We develop a general theory of experimental EPR-steering criteria, derive a number of criteria applicable to discrete as well as continuous-variable observables, and study their efficacy in detecting that form of nonlocality in some classes of quantum states. We show that previous versions of EPR-type criteria can be rederived within this formalism, thus unifying these efforts from a modern quantum-information perspective and clarifying their conceptual and formal origin. The theory follows in close analogy with criteria for other forms of quantum nonlocality (Bell nonlocality and entanglement), and because it is a hybrid of those two, it may lead to insights into the relationship between the different forms of nonlocality and the criteria that are able to detect them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.880 · Cited by 7,573
A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. I
Bohm, D. (1952) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.85.166 · Cited by 5,510
Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model
Werner, R. F. (1989) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.40.4277 · Cited by 4,062
Quantum detection and estimation theory
Helstrom, C. W. (1969) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01007479 · Cited by 3,776
Die gegenw�rtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik
Schr�dinger, E. (1935) · Die Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf01491891 · Cited by 3,392
Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems
Schrödinger, E. (1935) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100013554 · Cited by 3,124
Speakable and Unspeakable in Quatum Mechanics
Bell, J. S., & Mermin, N. D. (1988) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2811599 · Cited by 2,985
Peres-Horodecki Separability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems
Simon, R. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2726 · Cited by 2,245
Cited by
Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V., & Wehner, S. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.419 · Cited by 2,688
Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers
Schnabel, R. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.04.001 · Cited by 513
Experimental EPR-steering using Bell-local states
Saunders, D. J., Jones, S. J., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2010) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1766 · Cited by 448
Self-citationJiráková, K., Černoch, A., Lemr, K., Bartkiewicz, K., & Miranowicz, A. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.062436 · Cited by 24
Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography
Abo, S., Soubusta, J., Jiráková, K., Bartkiewicz, K., Černoch, A., Lemr, K., & Miranowicz, A. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-35015-9 · Cited by 17
“The quantum steerability of a given two-qubit state ρ can be experimentally tested, assuming that each party is allowed to measure n observables in their sites (qubit), by the inequality derived by Cavalcanti, Jones, Wiseman, and Reid (CJWR), which reads [59]:”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Cavalcanti, E. G., Jones, S. J., Wiseman, H. M., & Reid, M. D.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2009-09-18
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2006427884
- Cited by
- 608
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental criteria for steering and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.80.032112
- The paper
- Cavalcanti, E. G., Jones, S. J., Wiseman, H. M., & Reid, M. D. (2009). Experimental criteria for steering and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.80.032112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
