Cited by 134Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Mechanism of entanglement preservation

Open access
Tong, Qing-Jun, An, Jun-Hong, Luo, Hong-Gang, Oh, C. H.·2010·Physical Review A

Abstract

We study the entanglement preservation of two qubits locally interacting with their reservoirs. We show that the existence of a bound state of the qubit and its reservoir and the non-Markovian effect are two essential ingredients and their interplay plays a crucial role in preserving the entanglement in the steady state. When the non-Markovian effect is neglected, the entanglement sudden death (ESD) is reproduced. On the other hand, when the non-Markovian is significantly strong but the bound state is absent, the phenomenon of the ESD and its revival is recovered. Our formulation presents a unified picture about the entanglement preservation and provides a clear clue on how to preserve the entanglement in quantum information processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.81.052330

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our mechanism cannot be captured by the previous treatment with Lorentzian spectrum, where the lower limit of the frequency integration is artificially extended from 0 to -∞, and this approximation loses the availability of the bound state.

    “Note that our mechanism cannot be captured by the previous treatment with Lorentzian spectrum [25, 26, 28, 33, 34], where the lower limit of the frequency integration in f ( t -τ ) is artificially extended from 0 to -∞ . This approximation is mathematically convenient but loses the availability of the bound state [40].”

    From Mechanism for quantum speedup in open quantum systems (2016) · cites this paper as [40]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tong, Q.-J., An, J.-H., Luo, H.-G., & Oh, C. H.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Lanzhou University (CN)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2010-05-24
Volume
81
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2036296465
Cited by
134
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • Lanzhou University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
entanglement preservation, entanglement sudden death, non-Markovian dynamics, two-qubit entanglement, open quantum systems, steady-state entanglement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review