The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Infinitesimal-propagation equation for decoherence of an orbital-angular-momentum-entangled biphoton state in atmospheric turbulence
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The requirement of unitarity holds for phase and amplitude distortions but does not occur when one experiences decoherence/depolarization.
“This is the case for the phase and amplitude distortions but does not occur when one experiences decoherence/depolarization (72).”
From Topological robustness of optical skyrmions through a real-world free-space link (2026) · cites this paper as [72]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Wootters, W. K. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245 · Cited by 8,290
Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits
Hill, S., & Wootters, W. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.5022 · Cited by 2,823
Smith, B. J., & Raymer, M. G. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.062104 · Cited by 97
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.1038/35085529 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.012306 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.013601 · DOI
- 10.1364/OPEX.12.005448 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.153901 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1364/JOSAA.25.000225 · DOI
- 10.1364/OE.17.017829 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.046609 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.053832 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1367-2630/9/4/094 · DOI · Paper page
- L. C. Andrews, 1998, Laser Beam Propagation Through Random Media, 10.1117/3.626196 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.021802 · DOI
- M. Abramowitz, 1972, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, 10.1119/1.1972842 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Topological robustness of optical skyrmions through a real-world free-space link
Peters, C., Hakobyan, V., Drozdov, A., Brasselet, E., Cox, M., & Forbes, A. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aee2671 · Cited by 11
Toward a quantum future for South Africa
Forbes, A., Petruccione, F., & Roux, F. S. (2021) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0060426 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Roux, F. S.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2011-05-17
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
