CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 47

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of atmospheric turbulence on the entanglement of spatial two-qubit states

Jha, Anand K., Tyler, Glenn A., Boyd, Robert W.·2010·Physical Review A
DOI 10.1103/physreva.81.053832
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We study the effects of atmospheric turbulence on the entanglement of spatial two-qubit states that are prepared using the signal and idler photons produced by parametric down-conversion. Such states are the basic ingredients of quantum information protocols and can be prepared, for example, by making down-converted photons pass through a pair of double-apertures. We make use of the Kolmogorov model for atmospheric turbulence and quantify the entanglement of the two-qubit state in terms of Wootters's concurrence. We restrict our analysis to the two-qubit states that can be represented by density matrices having only two nonzero diagonal elements.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.81.053832

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nonuniform refractive index profiles caused by variations in temperature and pressure result in unwanted coupling within high-dimensional degrees of freedom in classical links and a loss of entanglement for quantum channels.

    “Nonuniform refractive index profiles caused by variations in temperature and pressure result in unwanted coupling within these high-dimensional DoFs in classical links (23–27) and a loss of entanglement for quantum channels (28–33)”

    From Topological robustness of optical skyrmions through a real-world free-space link (2026) · cites this paper as [28]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1038/nphoton.2007.22 · DOI
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3283 · DOI
  3. 10.1364/OL.34.000142 · DOI
  4. 10.1364/JOSAA.25.000225 · DOI
  5. 10.1364/OPEX.12.005448 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.153901 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.062323 · DOI
  8. 10.1088/1367-2630/9/4/094 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1364/JOSA.56.001372 · DOI
  10. 10.1119/1.19310 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2245 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.010501 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.013828 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2881 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2594 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.062304 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.253601 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.100501 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.032314 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2495 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.220501 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.240401 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.053601 · DOI
  26. 10.1364/OE.17.008287 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jha, A. K., Tyler, G. A., & Boyd, R. W.
Venue
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2010-05-18
Volume
81
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
DOI
10.1103/physreva.81.053832
Cited by
47
References
4
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review