The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying, characterizing, and controlling information flow in ultracold atomic gases
Open accessAbstract
We study quantum information flow in a model comprised of a trapped impurity qubit immersed in a Bose-Einstein-condensed reservoir. We demonstrate how information flux between the qubit and the condensate can be manipulated by engineering the ultracold reservoir within experimentally realistic limits. We show that this system undergoes a transition from Markovian to non-Markovian dynamics, which can be controlled by changing key parameters such as the condensate scattering length. In this way, one can realize a quantum simulator of both Markovian and non-Markovian open quantum systems, the latter ones being characterized by a reverse flow of information from the background gas (reservoir) to the impurity (system).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Both the quantum measure for non-Markovianity and the witness for initial systemenvironment correlations studied here have been demonstrated very recently to be experimentally measurable quantities [44, 45, 48, 49].”
From Foundations and measures of quantum non-Markovianity (2012) · cites this paper as [45]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Quite recently, two experiments determining this quantity have been carried out employing photons moving in optical fibers or birefringent materials [44, 45].”
From Foundations and measures of quantum non-Markovianity (2012) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“It has been demonstrated that a complete determination of the measure is experimentally possible, including the realization of the maximization over initial states in the definition (76).”
From Foundations and measures of quantum non-Markovianity (2012) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“In these experiments the open system is provided by the polarization degrees of freedom of the photons, while the environment is given by their frequency (mode) degrees of freedom.”
From Foundations and measures of quantum non-Markovianity (2012) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“It was shown further that a careful preparation of the initial environmental state allows to control the information flow between the system and its environment and to observe the transition from the Markovian to the non-Markovian regime through quantum state tomography carried out on the open system.”
From Foundations and measures of quantum non-Markovianity (2012) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,450
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition
Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667 · Cited by 8,436
Many-body physics with ultracold gases
Bloch, I., Dalibard, J., & Zwerger, W. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.885 · Cited by 8,114
Theory of open quantum systems
Xu, R., & Yan, Y. (2002) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1474579 · Cited by 6,622
The Theory of Open Quantum Systems
Breuer, H.-P., & Petruccione, F. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213900.001.0001 · Cited by 5,938
Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms
Greiner, M., Mandel, O., Esslinger, T., Hänsch, T. W., & Bloch, I. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415039a · Cited by 5,935
Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases
Chin, C., Grimm, R., Julienne, P. S., & Tiesinga, E. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1225 · Cited by 3,862
Townsend, C. G., Ketterle, W., & Stringari, S. (1997) · Physics World · doi:10.1088/2058-7058/10/3/21 · Cited by 2,825
(2004) · World scientific series on atomic, molecular and optical physics · doi:10.1142/9789812567857_0009 · Cited by 2,100
Anderson localization of a non-interacting Bose–Einstein condensate
Roati, G., D’Errico, C., Fallani, L., Fattori, M., Fort, C., Zaccanti, M., Modugno, G. C., Modugno, M., & Inguscio, M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07071 · Cited by 1,853
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Colloquium : Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems
Breuer, H., Laine, E.-M., Piilo, J., & Vacchini, B. (2016) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.021002 · Cited by 1,459
Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection
Rivas, Á., Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2014) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/094001 · Cited by 1,035
Quantifying non-Markovianity via correlations
Luo, S., Fu, S., & Song, H. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.044101 · Cited by 357
Non-Markovianity and reservoir memory of quantum channels: a quantum information theory perspective
Bylicka, B., Chruściński, D., & Maniscalco, S. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep05720 · Cited by 366
Self-citationIndividual Quantum Probes for Optimal Thermometry
Correa, L. A., Mehboudi, M., Adesso, G., & Sanpera, A. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.220405 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Haikka, P., McEndoo, S., De Chiara, G., Palma, G. M., & Maniscalco, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Turku (FI)
- University of Palermo (IT)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2011-09-20
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W1998640974
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Generalitat de Catalunya (00343)
- Suomen Kulttuurirahasto
- Emil Aaltosen Säätiö
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- quantum information flow, ultracold atoms, Bose-Einstein condensate, non-Markovian dynamics, Markovian dynamics, open quantum systems, quantum simulation, information backflow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
