The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fisher information and multiparticle entanglement
Open accessAbstract
The Fisher information $F$ gives a limit to the ultimate precision achievable in a phase estimation protocol. It has been shown recently that the Fisher information for a linear two-mode interferometer cannot exceed the number of particles if the input state is separable. As a direct consequence, with such input states the shot-noise limit is the ultimate limit of precision. In this work, we go a step further by deducing bounds on $F$ for several multiparticle entanglement classes. These bounds imply that genuine multiparticle entanglement is needed for reaching the highest sensitivities in quantum interferometry. We further compute similar bounds on the average Fisher information $\overline{F}$ for collective spin operators, where the average is performed over all possible spin directions. We show that these criteria detect different sets of states and illustrate their strengths by considering several examples, also using experimental data. In particular, the criterion based on $\overline{F}$ is able to detect certain bound entangled states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As a result, the bound could be valid for non Markovian dynamics as long as they admit a representation in terms of a CP map [38].”
From Quantum Speed Limits in Open System Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“Apart from quantum metrology, the QFI also connects to other aspects of quantum physics, such as quantum phase transition [18][19][20] and entanglement witness [21,22].”
From Quantum Fisher information matrix and multiparameter estimation (2020) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 · Cited by 21,230
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,450
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 · Cited by 10,118
Coherence in Spontaneous Radiation Processes
Dicke, R. H. (1954) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.93.99 · Cited by 7,445
Mathematical Methods of Statistics.
Geary, R. C., & Cramer, H. L. (1947) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2226151 · Cited by 6,095
Separability Criterion for Density Matrices
Peres, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.1413 · Cited by 5,191
Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model
Werner, R. F. (1989) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.40.4277 · Cited by 4,062
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- M. B. Plenio, 2007, Quant. Inf. Comput., 7, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 593
Precision protection through indirect correlations
Jin, Y. (2016) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2016.01.017 · Cited by 4
s u ( d ) -squeezing and many-body entanglement geometry in finite-dimensional systems
Vitagliano, G., Gühne, O., & Tóth, G. (2025) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2025-09-03-1844 · Cited by 3
State space geometry of the spin-1 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg chain
Lambert, J., & Sørensen, E. S. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.174427 · Cited by 3
“Second, it is possible that massive positive curvature is an intrinsic feature any GME phase.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMishref, E., El-Tawargy, A. S., Ramadan, W. A., & Nawareg, M. (2024) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.515293 · Cited by 3
Multipartite entanglement detection via generalized Wigner–Yanase skew information
Hong, Y., Xing, Y., Gao, L., Gao, T., & Yan, F. (2024) · Results in Physics · doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107624 · Cited by 3
“[40–42] can witness certain k -partite entanglement, and they are complementary to those based on variance [43].”
BackgroundInfluentialDaneshmand, F., Baghshahi, H. R., & Mirafzali, S. Y. (2024) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ad9257 · Cited by 3
“In various research studies, temperature [ 57, 58 ] , the damping rate [ 40 ] , frequency [ 59 ] , phase [ 60 ] , the coupling strength [ 61 ] and the detuning parameters [ 62 ] were estimated in various systems, such as a micromaser, optical interferometers, an optical cavity and an optomechanical…”
Uncertainty Relations between Quantum Fisher Information and Entanglement Monotones
Du, S., Liu, S., Fadel, M., Vitagliano, G., & He, Q. (2026) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/54mc-2yl3 · Cited by 3
“Consequently, any single-J k -based criterion, including the k -producible upper bounds of [26, 27], returns a trivial result ( F Q = 0) and cannot detect any entanglement in | Φ ⟩ .”
InfluentialBures geodesics and quantum metrology
Spehner, D. (2025) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2025-04-18-1715 · Cited by 3
Iterative optimization in quantum metrology and entanglement theory using semidefinite programming
Lukács, Á., Trényi, R., Vértesi, T., & Tóth, G. (2025) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ae24a6 · Cited by 3
“It has also been shown that the larger the achieved precision in parameter estimation with a multiparticle system, the larger the depth of entanglement the state must possess [6, 7].”
Detection of genuine tripartite entanglement in quantum network scenario
Paul, B., Mukherjee, K., Karmakar, S., Sarkar, D., Mukherjee, A., Roy, A., & Bhattacharya, S. S. (2020) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-020-02750-1 · Cited by 4
Gupta, S., Das, D., Jebarathinam, C., Roy, A., Datta, S., & Majumdar, A. S. (2022) · Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations · doi:10.1007/s40509-021-00261-x · Cited by 3
“Studies on multipartite entanglement have gained a lot of attention due to their foundational significance as well as their information theoretic applications, for example, in extreme spin squeezing [3], high sensitivity metrology tasks [4, 5], quantum computing using cluster states [6], measurement-based quantum comp…”
BackgroundCorrelated qubit coherences stimulated by thermal energy
Abari, N. E., Rakhubovsky, A. A., & Filip, R. (2024) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ad6bb6 · Cited by 3
Constant Overhead Entanglement Distillation via Scrambling
Gu, A., Leone, L., Goodenough, K., & Khatri, S. (2026) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/3q4z-llv8 · Cited by 9
An Open Quantum System Interacting with an Interference Engineering Environment
Wang, H., & Wang, J. (2025) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e27030228 · Cited by 3
“The measurements that achieve the quantum Cramér–Rao bound are termed as optimal distinguishing measurements [89,91].”
Witnessing disorder in quantum magnets
Sabharwal, S., Shimokawa, T., & Shannon, N. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/95fl-rxl3 · Cited by 3
“The connection between QFI and multi-partite entan-glement holds [30] for local operators ˆ O with bounded spectrum.”
InfluentialPrecision protection through cosmic string in quantum metrology
Jin, Y. (2020) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08776-0 · Cited by 3
Nonequilibrium Enhanced Classical Measurement and Estimation
Zeng, Q., & Wang, J. (2022) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10955-022-02974-8 · Cited by 3
Heuristic for estimation of multiqubit genuine multipartite entanglement
Mendonça, P. E. M. F., Marchiolli, M. A., & Milburn, G. J. (2015) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749915500239 · Cited by 3
Quantification of bipartite and multipartite entangled states in Mach–Zehnder interferometer
Jafarizaeh, M. A., Nosraty, F., & Sahrai, M. (2014) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2014.10.072 · Cited by 3
“the highest sensitivity allowed by quantum mechanics [13,21,22].”
BackgroundDetection of Bell correlations at finite temperature from matter-wave interference fringes
Niezgoda, A., Chwedeńczuk, J., Pezzè, L., & Smerzi, A. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.062115 · Cited by 3
Self-citationThe optimal estimation state of one-axis twisting model
Alhashash, A., Zidan, N., & METWALLY, N. (2020) · Optik · doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165934 · Cited by 3
Renormalization of concurrence and quantum Fisher information in two-dimensional XXZ model
Iftikhar, M. T., Usman, M., & Khan, K. (2021) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01477-x · Cited by 3
An improved lower bound of genuine tripartite entanglement concurrence
Wang, J., Zhu, X., Li, M., Shen, S., & Fei, S.-M. (2021) · Laser Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/1612-202x/ac2eed · Cited by 3
Quantum-enhanced multiparameter estimation in multiarm interferometersPreprint
Ciampini, M. A., Spagnolo, N., Vitelli, C., Pezzè, L., Smerzi, A., & Sciarrino, F. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1507.07814 · Cited by 3
“The right-hand side inequality in Eqs (4) and (5) is saturated if and only if the FIM is diagonal.”
BackgroundSelf-citationFisher information of orbital angular momentum quantum states in atmospheric turbulence
Yu, X., Zhong, W., Zhu, Y., Wang, J., Li, M., Khakhomov, S. A., & Hu, Z.-D. (2024) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.528811 · Cited by 2
Optimal and robust quantum state tomography of star-topology register
Liu, R., Hou, Y., Wu, Z., Zhou, H., Chen, J., Li, Z., & Peng, X. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad692c · Cited by 2
Dicke subsystems are entangled
Szalay, S., & Nyári, P. (2025) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2025-11-06-1908 · Cited by 2
Dynamics of quantum Fisher and Wigner-Yanase skew information following a noisy quench
Naji, J., Jafari, R., Akbari, A., & Abdi, M. (2025) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/1btj-tnkr · Cited by 2
“Apart from quantum metrology, the QFI also connects to other aspects of quantum physics, such as quantum phase transition [60–63], entanglement witness [57, 64–68], uncer-a r X i v : 2507 .”
Generation and Read-Out of Many-Body Bell Correlations with a Probe Qubit
Płodzień, M., & Chwedeńczuk, J. (2026) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/gmpy-2sgh · Cited by 2
The effects of symmetrical arrangement on quantum metrology
Jin, Y. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00544-7 · Cited by 2
Enhancing the parameter estimation precision in a damped system by square-wave modulation
Wang, D., Li, X., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Metrologia · doi:10.1088/1681-7575/ab9586 · Cited by 2
Sadugol, S., & Kaplan, L. (2023) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0137125 · Cited by 3
Classifying entanglement by algebraic geometry
Gharahi, M. (2023) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749923500478 · Cited by 5
Daneshmand, F., Baghshahi, H. R., & Mirafzali, S. Y. (2024) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-024-04444-4 · Cited by 2
“It has also been shown that the average QFI can be used to detect the bound of entanglement for several examples of entangled states [27–29].”
Distinguishing bounce and inflation via quantum signatures from cosmic microwave background
Chandran, S. M., & Shankaranarayanan, S. (2024) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271824410098 · Cited by 2
Quantum-classical correspondence of chaotic dynamics in a continuously driven system
Li, K., Liu, Y., & Li, S.-C. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.052402 · Cited by 2
Allemand, M., Jannin, R., Dupuy, G., Bureik, J., Pezzè, L., Boiron, D., & Clément, D. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.040324 · Cited by 2
Self-citationWu, K., Chen, Z., Xu, Z., Ma, Z., & Fei, S. (2024) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202400443 · Cited by 2
Sharma, S., Chwedeńczuk, J., & Wasak, T. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.l012038 · Cited by 2
“In the non-Gaussian regime, very strongly entangled states manifest through the Heisenberg scaling F Q ∝ N 2 [47].”
Detecting genuine multipartite entanglement based on a class of symmetric measurements
Qi, X., Pang, Y., & Hou, J. (2025) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-025-04729-2 · Cited by 2
Classical geometric fluctuation relations
Melo, P. B., Queirós, S. M. D., Soares-Pinto, D. O., & Morgado, W. A. M. (2025) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/add229 · Cited by 2
An Effective Way to Determine the Separability of Quantum State
Yang, M.-C., & Qiao, C. (2025) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2025-05-06-1734 · Cited by 2
“…the computable cross norm or re-Cong-Feng Qiao: qiaocf@ucas.ac.cn alignment (CCNR) criterion [12–14], correlation matrix method [15–19], local uncertainty relation (LUR) criteria [20–25], covariance matrix [26, 27], quantum Fisher information (QFI) method [28– 31], moment method [32–35], etc.”
Towards scalable active steering protocols for genuinely entangled state manifolds
Morales, S., Pappalardi, S., & Egger, R. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.023170 · Cited by 1
Quantifying Entanglement of Multipartite Quantum States
Li, H., Gao, T., & Yan, F. (2025) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202500285 · Cited by 2
“For larger k , the k -producible entanglement states have higher sensitivity and hence higher accuracy in phase estimation, which has been demonstrated experimentally [48–50] and has also resulted in the emergence of k -producible entanglement criteria [51].”
Allhibi, H., Aljuaydi, F., Hessian, H. A., & Mohamed, A. A. (2025) · Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures · doi:10.1016/j.physe.2025.116317 · Cited by 2
Molecular Entanglement Witness by Absorption Spectroscopy in Cavity QED
Wu, W., Fassioli, F., Huse, D. A., & Scholes, G. D. (2025) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c01392 · Cited by 2
Lourenço, A. C., Candido, D. R., & Duzzioni, E. I. (2025) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2025.170196 · Cited by 2
Prajapati, T., Mehta, H., Banerjee, S., Panigrahi, P. K., & Narayanan, V. (2025) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202500366 · Cited by 2
Zheng, X., Ma, S., Zhang, G., Fan, H., Liu, W., & Kwek, L. C. (2021) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.202100014 · Cited by 2
Bound entangled singlet-like states for quantum metrology
Pál, K. F., Tóth, G., Bene, E., & Vértesi, T. (2021) · Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) · Cited by 2
Entanglement storage by classical fixed points in the two-axis countertwisting model
Kajtoch, D., Pawłowski, K., & Witkowska, E. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.022331 · Cited by 2
Renormalization-group approach to quantum Fisher information in the two-dimensional XY model
Zhao, Z. J., Gao, G., Ren, Y., & Liu, X. (2021) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02152-x · Cited by 2
Quantum Fisher information of N-qubit W and GHZ superposition state under nonlocal operation
Li, Y. (2022) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02701-y · Cited by 2
Li, Y., & Ren, Z. (2023) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114289 · Cited by 2
Diagonal entropy and topological phase transitions in extended Kitaev chains
Qiao, H., Sun, Z., Sun, F.-X., Mu, L.-Z., He, Q., & Fan, H. (2019) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2019.167967 · Cited by 2
Coherent state superpositions, entanglement, and gauge/gravity correspondence
Lin, H., & Zhu, Y. (2021) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0039859 · Cited by 2
“The concept of quantum Fisher information is useful for precision quantum measurement [26, 27, 28].”
BackgroundRajauria, P., Chawla, P., & Chandrashekar, C. M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.04572 · Cited by 4
Quantum verification with few copiesPreprint
Morris, J., Saggio, V., Gočanin, A., & Dakić, B. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 2
Detection of genuine multipartite entanglement in arbitrary multipartite systems
Lu, Y. S., & Fei, S.-M. (2023) · Results in Physics · doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106816 · Cited by 3
Cardoso-Isidoro, C., & Delgado, F. (2024) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym16010074 · Cited by 1
Quantum Parameter Estimation With Graph States In SU(N) Dynamics
Tao, H. G., Huang, R., & Tan, X. (2024) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202300254 · Cited by 4
Hong, Y., Hao, X., & Gao, L. (2024) · Laser Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/1612-202x/ad8cc6 · Cited by 1
Multipartite entanglement structures in quantum stabilizer states
Sharma, V., & Mueller, E. J. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/1cqt-8rxf · Cited by 3
Chelluri, S. S., Khatri, S., & van Loock, P. (2026) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-026-01294-z · Cited by 1
“Indeed, by creating small-scale GHZ states at the highest-degree nodes within the network, these sources only need to be located at the highest-degree nodes, rather than at every individual node or at the mid-point of every edge of the network.”
Fluctuation as a probe of entanglement transition in a monitored free-fermion chain
Qiu, W.-J., Yu, Y.-C., & Cai, X. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/ps1h-ftfw · Cited by 1
Enhancing Revivals via Projective Measurements in a Quantum Scarred System
Paviglianiti, A., & Silva, A. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/jf2f-wqkx · Cited by 1
Imai, S. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/kzr9-fxx3 · Cited by 1
“Entanglement depth [40, 41, 66, 67] quantifies how many particles are genuinely entangled in a given quantum state.”
InfluentialTransfer of quantum-enhanced information through a many-body system
Wysocki, P., Płodzień, M., & Chwedeńczuk, J. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/3z4c-svn1 · Cited by 1
“Namely, when I q [ˆ ϱ sr ] /M ≥ k , then source has k -depth entanglement [69, 70].”
Quantum Fisher information and nonlocal operators in one-dimensional quantum chains
Wu, C., Qu, S., Guo, B., & Sun, Z. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/8wh6-nl26 · Cited by 1
Fractal structure of multipartite entanglement in monitored quantum circuits
Sharma, V., & Mueller, E. J. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/rdb3-gtwp · Cited by 1
Saha, D., & Sen, U. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/96bz-51yp · Cited by 3
Semiclassical Geometric Tensor in Multiparameter Quantum Information
Imai, S., Yang, J., & Pezzè, L. (2026) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/3bwh-dhmv · Cited by 4
Self-citationEntanglement and Private Information in Many-Body Thermal States
Garratt, S. J., & McGinley, M. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/mgjv-2p73 · Cited by 1
Witnessing Spin-Orbital Entanglement Using Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering
Shen, Z., Ding, S., Zhao, Z., Evangelista, F. A., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/nyxb-nqtq · Cited by 1
“…for ¯ O q is then expressible purely through experimentally accessible RIXS spectra: For a k -producible state | Ψ k − prod ⟩ , it is bounded by [14]: where λ (max) j and λ (min) j denote the largest and smallest eigenvalues of the Hermitian matrix ¯ T ( j, q ) αβ ( ϵ i , ϵ s ) = e i ( q · r j…”
Robust multipartite entanglement in dirty topological wires
Pezzè, L., & Lepori, L. (2026) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/n7k4-v7yw · Cited by 3
“(5) signals an entanglement depth greater than k , namely at least ( k + 1)-partite entanglement among the L subsystems H l [29, 30].”
Self-citationThermodynamic uncertainty relations from the integral representation of quantum Fisher information
Meng, Y.-M., & Shi, Z.-Y. (2026) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.20.6.177 · Cited by 1
Anonymous, Reilly, J., & Holland, M. (2026) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/sq34-nf4v · Cited by 1
“Due to its importance, many theoretical techniques have been developed to detect, characterize, and analyze the entan-glement in a quantum system, e.g., quantum Fisher information [1, 30, 31], quantum state tomography [32–34], and the Schmidt decomposition [18, 35, 36].”
Yolles, M. I., & Lin, C.-K. (2026) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems14091132 · Cited by 1
Lee, S.-Y., Bang, J., & Kim, J. (2019) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-019-2379-2 · Cited by 1
Many-Spin Entanglement in Multiple Quantum NMR with a Dipolar Ordered Initial State
Lazarev, I. D., & Fel’dman, E. B. (2020) · Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1134/s1063776120110059 · Cited by 1
“where n is the integer part of N/k, then the system with the density matrix ρ(τ) is (k+1)-spin entangled [33, 34, 35].”
BackgroundIftikhar, M. T., Usman, M., & Khan, K. (2022) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-022-05021-0 · Cited by 1
Detecting spin nonclassicality via average skew information
Dai, H., & Luo, S. (2022) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02875-5 · Cited by 1
Xing, Y., Hong, Y., Gao, L., Gao, T., & Yan, F. (2024) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-023-04233-5 · Cited by 1
Quantum Multi-Parameter Estimation Near Criticality in Ising-XXZ Diamond Structure
Yan, B., & Chen, P. (2024) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-024-05778-6 · Cited by 1
Sahil (2024) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ad827e · Cited by 1
Asymmetry activation and its relation to coherence under permutation operation
Hayashi, M. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-11-07-1517 · Cited by 1
“The Dicke states are optimal in linear interferometers, in the sense, that they saturate the inequality F , which are saturated also by GHZ states [23, 24].”
BackgroundUnlocking Heisenberg Sensitivity with Sequential Weak Measurement Preparation
Lantaño, T. B., Yang, D., Audenaert, K. M. R., Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2025) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2025-01-14-1590 · Cited by 4
“(3) is also a witness for multipar-tite entanglement [47]: | ϕ ( S ) ⟩ is at least ⌊ F Q /M ⌋ partite entangled, with ⌊ x ⌋ indicating the largest integer not greater than x .”
Optimal local measurements in single-parameter quantum metrology
Liu, J., Yang, J., Shi, H., & Yu, S. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.022436 · Cited by 1
Approaching the double-Heisenberg scaling sensitivity in the Tavis–Cummings model
Su, Y., Ying, T., Лю, Б., & Wang, X. (2025) · APL Photonics · doi:10.1063/5.0252072 · Cited by 1
Quantum Fisher information density in infinite-size extended Ising chains
Qu, S., Cheng, H.-G., Wu, C., Guo, B., & Sun, Z. (2025) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/s10051-025-00946-x · Cited by 1
Xiao, X., Li, G., Liang, H., & Wang, X. (2019) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-019-04083-x · Cited by 1
Enhancement of the metrological sensitivity limit through knowledge of the average energy
Gessner, M. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032114 · Cited by 1
“[21] P.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTwist-and-store entanglement in bimodal and spin-1 Bose-Einstein condensates
Niezgoda, A., Witkowska, E., & Mirkhalaf, S. S. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.053315 · Cited by 1
Quantum Apices: Identifying Limits of Entanglement, Nonlocality, & ContextualityPreprint
Wolfe, E. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.2517 · Cited by 2
Multipartite entanglement in quantum phase transitionsPreprint
Gabbrielli, M. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.10537 · Cited by 1
“The solution is found by seeking the upper bound [25,26,35] for the more general κ-separable state in Eq.”
BackgroundControlling interactions in quantum materials : from a microscopic description to quantum simulation
Julià-Farré, S. (2022) · UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) · doi:10.5821/dissertation-2117-370853 · Cited by 1
Baamara, Y., Sinatra, A., & Gessner, M. (2022) · Comptes Rendus Physique · doi:10.5802/crphys.103
Heisenberg's Limit Phase Sensitivity in The Presence of Decoherence ChannelsPreprint
Nosraty, F. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.06249
“assical uncorrelated probe states is bounded by the so-called shot noise limit 𝜑=1/√J. It has been known that the entangled state can be utilized to enhance the estimation accuracy of the parameters [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Accordingly, N00N state is used to improve phase sensitivity, which this use of N00N state achieves the…”
MethodThe Effect of Field Changing on Two Qubit Entanglement with Different Criteria
Mirzaee, M., & Batavani, M. (2015) · Acta Physica Polonica A · doi:10.12693/aphyspola.127.663
Reconstruction and analysis of multi-photon entangled quantum states
Weinfurter, H. (2013)
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hyllus, P., Laskowski, W., Krischek, R., Schwemmer, C., Wieczorek, W., Weinfurter, H., Pezzé, L., & Smerzi, A.
- Affiliations
- University of the Basque Country (ES)
- University of Gdańsk (PL)
- Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics (DE)
- University of Trento (IT)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-02-16
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2041209858
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 19.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- INO Open Portal (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- Fisher information, multipartite entanglement, quantum phase estimation, quantum interferometry, shot-noise limit, entanglement detection, bound entangled states, quantum metrology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
