Cited by 99

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum walk of two interacting bosons

Lahini, Yoav, Verbin, Mor, Huber, Sebastian D., Bromberg, Yaron, Pugatch, Rami, Silberberg, Yaron·2012·Physical Review A

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.86.011603

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Actual plasmonic bunching was experimentally observed in 2013.

    “actual plasmonic bunching was experimentally observed in 2013 [180].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [180]

    The Figure 4 passage reports experimentally measured spatial bunching in thermal light, and the Abstract describes experiments in nonlinear photonic lattices. Neither passage identifies the effect as plasmonic or reports an observation in 2013, so those parts of the claim are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • With increasing interaction strength, the Fermionization process competes with reciprocal and nonreciprocal bunching, while non-bunching states become more prevalent.

    “With increasing interaction strength, the Fermionization process85 starts competing with the reciprocal bunching [Fig. 2c] and the nonreciprocal bunching effect [Fig. 2d], while non-bunching states progressively become more prevalent [Fig. 2e, f].”
  • The observed plasmonic HOM dip had a visibility of 0.43±0.02, below the classical limit of 0.5.

    “Although the observed dip had only a visibility of 0.43±0.02(see Fig. 8b) and thus below the classical limit of 0.5”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [180]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1080/00107151031000110776 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nature09827 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.062307 · DOI
  4. 10.1088/1367-2630/13/3/033029 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nature04918 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.16.2437 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.aop.2010.02.006 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.033609 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.053604 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.physrep.2008.04.004 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lahini, Y., Verbin, M., Huber, S. D., Bromberg, Y., Pugatch, R., & Silberberg, Y.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2012-07-16
Volume
86
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
Cited by
99
References
12
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review