Cited by 208Strong Light-Matter InteractionsQuantum optics and atomic interactionsMechanical and Optical Resonators

Low-disorder microwave cavity lattices for quantum simulation with photons

Open access
Underwood, D. L., Shanks, W. E., Koch, Jens, Houck, A. A.·2012·Physical Review A

Abstract

We assess experimentally the suitability of coupled-transmission-line resonators for studies of quantum phase transitions of light. We have measured devices with low photon hopping rates $t/2\ensuremath{\pi}=0.8$ MHz to quantify disorder in individual cavity frequencies. The observed disorder is consistent with small imperfections in fabrication. We studied the dependence of the disorder on transmission-line geometry and used our results to fabricate devices with disorder less than two parts in ${10}^{4}$. The normal-mode spectrum of devices with a high photon hopping rate $t/2\ensuremath{\pi}=31$ MHz shows little effect of disorder, rendering resonator arrays a good backbone for the study of condensed-matter physics with photons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.86.023837

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]A. L. C. Hayward, A. M. Martin, and A. D. Greentree, ' Fractional Quantum Hall Physics in Jaynes-CummingsHubbard Lattices ,' arXiv:1202.5067v1 (2012). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Underwood, D. L., Shanks, W. E., Koch, J., & Houck, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2012-08-20
Volume
86
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2087568007
Cited by
208
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Mechanical and Optical Resonators
Keywords
normal mode spectrum, fabrication imperfections, transmission line geometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review