Cited by 565Strong Light-Matter InteractionsMechanical and Optical ResonatorsQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Photon-blockade-induced Mott transitions and X Y spin models in coupled cavity arrays

Open access
Angelakis, Dimitris G., Santos, Marcelo Franca, Bose, Sougato·2007·Physical Review A

Abstract

We propose a physical system where photons could exhibit strongly correlated effects. We demonstrate how a Mott-insulator phase of atom-photon excitations (polaritons) can arise in an array of individually addressable coupled electromagnetic cavities when each of these cavities is coupled resonantly to a single two-level system (atom, quantum dot, or Cooper pair). This Mott phase is characterized by the same integral number of net polaritonic excitations with photon blockade providing the required repulsion between the excitations in each site. Detuning the atomic and photonic frequencies suppresses this effect and induces a transition to a photonic superfluid. Finally, on resonance the system can straightforwardly simulate the dynamics of many-body spin systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.76.031805

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recently there has been substantial progress in investigations of other possible candidates for AQS, such as photonic systems, photonic and polariton systems, and artificial lattices in solid state systems.

    “Recently there has also been substantial progress in investigations of other possible candidates for AQS, such as photonic systems [31, 32, 34-36], photonic and polariton systems [33, 38-42], artificial lattices in solid state systems [44].”

    From Can one trust quantum simulators? (2012) · cites this paper as [40]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Angelakis, D. G., Santos, M. F., & Bose, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2007-09-28
Volume
76
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2011487267
Cited by
565
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 47
FWCI
21.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Mechanical and Optical Resonators
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
photon blockade, Mott transition, coupled cavity arrays, polaritons, XY model, quantum simulation, two-level system, quantum dots, Cooper pairs, detuning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review