The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Security of practical private randomness generation
Open accessAbstract
Measurements on entangled quantum systems necessarily yield outcomes that are intrinsically unpredictable if they violate a Bell inequality. This property can be used to generate certified randomness in a device-independent way, i.e., without making detailed assumptions about the internal working of the quantum devices used to generate the random numbers. Furthermore these numbers are also private; i.e., they appear random not only to the user but also to any adversary that might possess a perfect description of the devices. Since this process requires a small initial random seed to sample the behavior of the quantum devices and to extract uniform randomness from the raw outputs of the devices, one usually speaks of device-independent randomness expansion. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, we point out that in most real, practical situations, where the concept of device independence is used as a protection against unintentional flaws or failures of the quantum apparatuses, it is sufficient to show that the generated string is random with respect to an adversary that holds only classical side information; i.e., proving randomness against quantum side information is not necessary. Furthermore, the initial random seed does not need to be private with respect to the adversary, provided that it is generated in a way that is independent from the measured systems. The devices, however, will generate cryptographically secure randomness that cannot be predicted by the adversary, and thus one can, given access to free public randomness, talk about private randomness generation. The theoretical tools to quantify the generated randomness according to these criteria were already introduced in S. Pironio et al. [Nature (London) 464, 1021 (2010)], but the final results were improperly formulated. The second aim of this paper is to correct this inaccurate formulation and therefore lay out a precise theoretical framework for practical device-independent randomness generation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“On the basis of the Clauser -Horne -Shimony -Holt (CHSH) inequality, 56 Fehr et al. 57 and Pironio et al. 58 proposed self-testing randomness expansion protocols against classical adversaries.”
From Quantum random number generation (2016) · cites this paper as [58]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471200611 · Cited by 37,139
Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem
Ekert, A. K. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.661 · Cited by 10,777
Elements of Information Theory
Jacobs, K. (1992) · Birkhäuser Basel eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8645-1_7 · Cited by 2,957
Probability and Random Processes.
Grimmett, G. R., & Stirzaker, D. R. (2001) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198572237.001.0001 · Cited by 1,850
Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks
Acín, A., Brunner, N., Gisin, N., Massar, S., Pironio, S., & Scarani, V. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.230501 · Cited by 1,537 · cited 4×
“Consider for instance that the reported attacks [29, 30, 31] on commercial QKD systems did not exploit any intentional, maliciouss flaws in the devices.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationRandom numbers certified by Bell’s theorem
Pironio, S., Acín, A., Massar, S., de la Giroday, A. B., Matsukevich, D. N., Maunz, P., Olmschenk, S., Hayes, D., Luo, L., Manning, T. A., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09008 · Cited by 1,420 · cited 9×
“For instance, in the experiment reported in [14] no particular measures have been taken to screen-off one device from the other.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationSpeakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy
Bell, J. S., & Aspect, A. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815676 · Cited by 1,261
Hacking commercial quantum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumination
Lydersen, L., Wiechers, C., Wittmann, C., Elser, D., Skaar, J., & Makarov, V. (2010) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.214 · Cited by 1,005
No Signaling and Quantum Key Distribution
Barrett, J., Hardy, L., & Kent, A. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.010503 · Cited by 916 · cited 3×
“o testing for high value uses.” Device-independent randomness generation aims to address these problems by exploiting the intrinsic unpredictability associated with the violation of Bell inequalities [9, 10, 11]. More precisely, consider a quantum system composed of two separated parts A and B which upon receiving res…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA convergent hierarchy of semidefinite programs characterizing the set of quantum correlations
Navascués, M., Pironio, S., & Acín, A. (2008) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/7/073013 · Cited by 782
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- D. Mayers, 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput., 4, 273
- U. Vazirani, 2012, STOC'12 Proceedings of the 44th Symposium on Theory of Computing
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–169 of 169
Quantum Walk Random Number Generation: Memory-based Models
Bae, M. J. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce53715.2022.00058 · Cited by 4
“Currently, cryptographically secure QRNG protocols are well-reviewed, ranging from the case of all devices utilized, sources, and measurements are fully characterized, called “fully trusteddevice” scenario, to the case of all apparatuses operated in a QRNG protocol are not trusted, “device-independent (DI)” approach […”
BackgroundParity-based, bias-free optical quantum random number generation with min-entropy estimation
Coleman, M. R., Ingalls, K. G., Kavulich, J. T., Kemmerly, S. J., Salinas, N. C., Ramirez, E. V., & Schlosshauer, M. (2020) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.392286 · Cited by 3
“The second method uses the connection between violations of the CHSH inequality and the nonclassicality of the output [20–22].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialJain, R., & Kundu, S. (2025) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/23m1549353 · Cited by 3
Graphical Methods in Device-Independent Quantum Cryptography
Breiner, S., Miller, C. A., & Ross, N. J. (2019) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2019-05-27-146 · Cited by 5
“Research over the last decade has led to a proof that random numbers can be generated with devices that are completely untrusted [15, 33, 40, 34, 20, 17, 29, 28, 19, 5, 7].”
Experimental measurement-dependent local Bell test with human free will
Liu, Y., Yuan, X., Wu, C., Zhang, W., Guan, J.-Y., Zhong, J., Li, H., Li, M., Abellán, C., Mitchell, M. W., et al. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.022115 · Cited by 3
Topological phases of matter: Classification, realization and application
Deng, D.-L. (2015) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 3
Prospects for device-independent quantum key distributionPreprint
Tan, E. Y.-Z. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000516275 · Cited by 5
Device-independent information protocols: measuring dimensionality, randomness and nonlocality
López, R. G. (2013) · doi:10.5821/dissertation-2117-94748 · Cited by 3
Randomness certification in a quantum network with independent sources
Minati, G., Rodari, G., Polino, E., Andreoli, F., Poderini, D., Chaves, R., Carvacho, G., & Sciarrino, F. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aea8571 · Cited by 7
Theory-independent randomness generation from spatial symmetries
Jones, C. L., Ludescher, S. L., Aloy, A., & Müller, M. P. (2026) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2026-01-16-1966 · Cited by 9
Semi-Quantum Random Number Generation
Guskind, J., & Krawec, W. O. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce57702.2023.00137 · Cited by 3
“Security models range from the extreme device independent scenario [1], [2], [3], [4] (where all measurement and source devices are untrusted) to the fully trusted scenario (where all devices are trusted and completely characterized).”
BackgroundQuantum Randomness Expansion: Upper and Lower Bounds
Yuen, H. (2013) · Cited by 2
Regularising data for practical randomness generation
Bourdoncle, B., Lin, P.-S., Rosset, D., Acín, A., & Liang, Y.-C. (2019) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab01e8 · Cited by 2
Device-independent certification of desirable properties with a confidence interval
Chang, W.-G., Chen, K.-C., Chen, K.-S., Chen, S.-L., & Liang, Y.-C. (2024) · Frontiers of Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1434095 · Cited by 4
“Secondly, these usual approaches and those that provide a DI point estimator [32– 34, 37] For the tasks of DI randomness expansion [47, 48] and DI quantum key distribution [49, 50], specific tools [51–59] have been developed to overcome the above problems.”
Miller, C. A., & Shi, Y. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1402.0489 · Cited by 2
“Classical security was proved in [31, 16, 32].”
Quantum Sampling for Optimistic Finite Key Rates in High Dimensional Quantum CryptographyPreprint
Yao, K., Krawec, W. O., & Zhu, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.04151 · Cited by 2
“On the opposite extreme is the fully device independent model [22, 23] whereby the source and measurement apparatus are not trusted (perhaps manufactured by the adversary - though one must still assume, of course, that the actual measurement outcome reported by the untrusted device cannot be sent…”
BackgroundOptimal and Feasible Contextuality-Based Randomness Generation
Liu, Y., & Ramanathan, R. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/cn3m-j743 · Cited by 1
Device-independent Shannon entropy certification
Okuła, R., & Mironowicz, P. (2025) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ae20b2 · Cited by 1
“It was also shown that this method of randomness certification is, in principle, device-independent [44].”
Topologically noise-robust network steering without inputs
Baheti, D., & Sarkar, S. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/r9py-kcgj · Cited by 1
Randomness expansion with a one-sided trusted device
Wang, H., Chen, K., Gao, M., Ma, Z., Wang, W., Li, C., & Ma, C. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.052308 · Cited by 1
Li, D., Gao, F., Cao, Y. N., & Wen, Q. (2019) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-019-2238-1 · Cited by 1
First Encounter with Bell Nonlocality
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.003.0001 · Cited by 1
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.003.0002 · Cited by 1
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.003.0008 · Cited by 1
Quantum Optical Tests of the Foundations of Physics
Shalm, L. K., Steinberg, A. M., Kwiat, P. G., & Chiao, R. Y. (2023) · Springer handbooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73893-8_84 · Cited by 1
(Almost-)Quantum Bell Inequalities and Device-Independent Applications
Liu, Y., Chung, H. Y., & Ramanathan, R. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-10-02-1489 · Cited by 1
Zhang, G., Xu, J., Li, M., Shen, S., Li, L., & Fei, S.-M. (2025) · Laser Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/1612-202x/adca9a · Cited by 1
Device-Independent Self-Testing
Scarani, V. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.003.0007 · Cited by 2
The effect on (2, N, 2) Bell tests with distributed measurement dependence
Li, D., Chen, L.-Y., Cao, Y. N., Huang, X., Gao, F., & Ma, Y. (2020) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-020-02819-x · Cited by 1
Sarvaghad-Moghaddam, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
Source Independent Quantum Walk Random Number GenerationPreprint
Bae, M., & Krawec, W. O. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.02252 · Cited by 2
“ing from the “fully trusted device” scenario (whereby all devices used, sources and measurements, are fully characterized) to the “fully device independent” scenario (where all devices used are not trusted) [1], [2].”
BackgroundFrom quantum foundations to quantum information protocols and back
Carazo, G. D. L. T. (2015) · doi:10.5821/dissertation-2117-95803 · Cited by 1
General security for randomness expansionPreprint
Miller, C. A., & Shi, Y. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Trading Isolation for Certifiable Randomness Expansion
Coudron, M. (2013) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Advances in quantum key distribution and quantum randomness generation
Thinh, L. P. (2015) · National University of Singapore
Advanced tests of nonlocality with entangled photons
Christensen, B. (2016) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Interplay between Quantumness, Randomness, and SelftestingPreprint
Yuan, X. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.00656
“For instance, observing violations of Bell’s inequalities can be applied in device independent tasks, such as quantum key distribution [55, 26, 56, 57], randomness amplification [58, 59, 60] and generation [61, 62, 63, 64], entanglement quantification [65], and dimension witness [66].”
BackgroundEntangled protocols and non-local games for testing quantum systems.
Coudron, M. (2017) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Bell inequalities for device-independent protocols
Salavrakos, A. (2019) · UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) · doi:10.5821/dissertation-2117-131434 · Cited by 1
Quantifying randomness from Bell nonlocality
Bourdoncle, B. (2019) · doi:10.5821/dissertation-2117-131744
“In that case, the deviceindependent approach allows to certify randomness even if the devices are imperfect or not fully characterised, and even if an adversary takes advantage of these possible flaws or lack of knowledge to try and predict the outcomes of the Bell test [PM13].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialScarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.003.0005
Nonlocality in the No-Signaling Framework
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.003.0009
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.003.0006
Review of Bipartite Bell Scenarios
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.003.0004
Bell Nonlocality in Quantum Theory
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.003.0003
Signaling and Measurement Dependence
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.003.0011
Enhancing device-independent estimation of quantum randomness from real experimental data
Wu, L., Li, J., Liu, T., Liu, C., Wang, X., & Wang, Q. (2019) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ab5c33
Impossibility of memory in hidden-signaling models for quantum correlations
Perito, I., Bellomo, G., Galicer, D., Figueira, S. D., Roncaglia, A. J., & Bendersky, A. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.052207
Effects of measurement dependence on 1-parameter family of Bell tests
Guo, F.-Z., Lv, Z.-T., Wei, S.-H., & Wen, Q. (2021) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-021-03300-z
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.003.0012
Liu, M. L., Kanitschar, F., Arqand, A., & Tan, E. Y.-Z. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.022426
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.005.0004
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.005.0007
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.002.0005
Basic Notions of Convex Optimization
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.005.0005
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.002.0003
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.002.0004
Notions of Quantum Theory Used in this Book
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.005.0003
Experimental Platforms: A Reading Guide
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.005.0002
Scarani, V. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198788416.005.0001
Sichere Zufallszahlengenerierung in Systemen mit kontinuierlichen Variablen
Haw, J. Y., Assad, S. M., & Lam, P. K. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54998-4_6
Mahato, S. S. (2026) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-026-06288-3
Noreen, T., Haider, M. Z., Zhang, K., Bensalem, H., & Gagnon, G. (2026) · Distributed Ledger Technologies Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3801095
“Practitioners require mechanisms to detect replay attacks or environmental drift where classical noise might bias the quantum source [57].”
Quantum Hardware Security and Near-term Applications
Ma, Y. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/4f128c9aze95ez495cza315z386b01b2df54
On the equivalence between classically verifiable position verification and certified randomness
Kaleoglu, F., Liu, M., Cui, D., Amer, O., Pistoia, M., Lim, C. C. W., & Chakraborty, K. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-70628-4 · Cited by 7
“This is in contrast with other methods of quantum random number generation, which use a variety of methods including the quantum probability estimation framework 49 , de Finetti reductions 62 , and the Azuma-Hoeffding Inequality 63 .”
Jia, Y., Guo, F., Li, M., Dong, H., & Gao, F. (2026) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.70348
Metadata
- Authors
- Pironio, S., & Massar, S.
- Affiliations
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-01-30
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W1988732892
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13
- FWCI
- 16.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-CHRI-0007)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Keywords
- device-independent randomness generation, private randomness, Bell inequality violation, randomness extraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review