The DOI matches its Crossref record.
State estimation: A comparison between direct state measurement and tomography
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“The modular value of an observable F with pre-and postselected states, |ψ in and |ψ f i can be written as [33]”
From Direct measurement methods of density matrix of an entangled quantum state (2020) · cites this paper as [33]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2832 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10120 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.220405 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.052110 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032108 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.012103 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep01193 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphoton.2013.24 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.052107 · DOI
- Y. Shikano, 2012, Measurements in Quantum Mechanics
- G. M. D'Ariano, 2007, Quantum Information with Continuous Variables of Atoms and Light
- U. Leonhardt, 1997, Measuring the Quantum State of Light
- 10.1088/1464-4266/5/1/311 · DOI
- 10.1088/0305-4470/34/1/307 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.070402 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.052111 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.40.2112 · DOI
- 10.1109/18.761271 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Direct measurement methods of density matrix of an entangled quantum state
Turek, Y. (2020) · Journal of Physics Communications · doi:10.1088/2399-6528/ab9938 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Maccone, L., & Rusconi, C. C.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-02-24
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
