The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Concise security bounds for practical decoy-state quantum key distribution
Open accessAbstract
Due to its ability to tolerate high channel loss, decoy-state quantum key distribution (QKD) has been one of the main focuses within the QKD community. Notably, several experimental groups have demonstrated that it is secure and feasible under real-world conditions. Crucially, however, the security and feasibility claims made by most of these experiments were obtained under the assumption that the eavesdropper is restricted to particular types of attacks or that the finite-key effects are neglected. Unfortunately, such assumptions are not possible to guarantee in practice. In this work, we provide concise and tight finite-key security bounds for practical decoy-state QKD that are valid against general attacks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
Self-citationNew hash functions and their use in authentication and set equality
Wegman, M. N., & Carter, J. L. (1981) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(81)90033-7 · Cited by 1,402
Direct and full-scale experimental verifications towards ground–satellite quantum key distribution
Wang, J.-Y., Yang, B., Liao, S.-K., Zhang, L., Shen, Q., Hu, X.-F., Wu, J.-C., Yang, S.-J., Jiang, H., Tang, Y.-L., et al. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.89 · Cited by 309
Cited by
Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices
Xu, F., Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Lo, H.-K., & Pan, J.-W. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.025002 · Cited by 1,543
Self-citationScalable high-rate, high-dimensional time-bin encoding quantum key distribution
Islam, N. T., Lim, C. C. W., Cahall, C., Qi, B., Kim, J., & Gauthier, D. J. (2019) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab21a4 · Cited by 38
Self-citationLi, Y.-P., Chen, W., Wang, F.-X., Yin, Z.-Q., Zhang, L., Liu, H., Wang, S., He, D.-Y., Zhou, Z., Guo, G.-C., et al. (2019) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.44.004523 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Lim, C. C. W., Curty, M., Walenta, N., Xu, F., & Zbinden, H.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-02-10
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2065368731
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concise security bounds for practical decoy-state quantum key distribution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.89.022307
- The paper
- Lim, C. C. W., Curty, M., Walenta, N., Xu, F., & Zbinden, H. (2014). Concise security bounds for practical decoy-state quantum key distribution. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.89.022307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
