The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Floquet edge states with ultracold atoms
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Various other schemes have been proposed to reach the anomalous regime of Floquet topological systems, applicable to a variety of physical platforms.
“Various other schemes have been proposed to reach the anomalous regime of Floquet topological systems, which can be applied to a variety of physical platforms (Kitagawa, Berg et al., 2010;Kitagawa, Rudner et al., 2010;Reichl and Mueller, 2014;Leykam, Rechtsman, and Chong, 2016;Quelle et al., 2017).”
From Topological photonics (2019) · cites this paper as Reichl and Mueller, 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Photonic Floquet topological insulators
Rechtsman, M. C., Zeuner, J. M., Plotnik, Y., Lumer, Y., Podolsky, D., Dreisow, F., Nolte, S., Segev, M., & Szameit, A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12066 · Cited by 3,332
Synthetic magnetic fields for ultracold neutral atoms
Lin, Y.-J., Compton, R. L., Jiménez-García, K., Porto, J. V., & Spielman, I. B. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08609 · Cited by 1,318
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1523 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.145301 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.023637 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.051605 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys1926 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.201109 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.200403 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.225304 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys2789 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.185301 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.185302 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.3.031005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1300170110 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.033620 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.063632 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.135302 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys2790 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.166802 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.235114 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.224106 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.023606 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.255303 · DOI
- 10.1140/epjst/e2013-01762-x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ozawa, T., Price, H. M., Amo, A., Goldman, N., Hafezi, M., Lu, L., Rechtsman, M. C., Schuster, D., Simon, J., Zilberberg, O., et al. (2019) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.015006 · Cited by 3,722
Lu, L., Joannopoulos, J. D., & Soljačić, M. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.248 · Cited by 3,655
Light-induced gauge fields for ultracold atoms
Goldman, N., Juzeliūnas, G., Öhberg, P., & Spielman, I. B. (2014) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/12/126401 · Cited by 1,212
Metadata
- Authors
- Reichl, M. D., & Mueller, E. J.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-06-30
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DGE-1144153, PHY-1068165)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
