Cited by 185Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsStatistical Mechanics and Entropy

Time-dependent projection-operator approach to master equations for coupled systems

Willis, C. R., Picard, R. H.·1974·Physical Review A

Abstract

In this paper we derive master equations for two or more systems coupled to each other, perhaps strongly, by using a generalization of the usual projection-operator technique to include time-dependent projection operators. The coupled systems may be either similar or dissimilar and classical or quantum mechanical. Whereas the customary approaches to coupled systems are best able to treat situations in which some of the systems are "baths" with a specified density operator or phase-space probability density, our approach allows us to treat situations where it is necessary or convenient to treat the coupled systems on an equal footing. In our scheme the "relevant" part of the full density operator is considered to be the uncorrelated part of the full density operator and is a symmetric functional of the reduced density operators of each of the coupled subsystems. The "irrelevant" part of the density operator is then the part describing correlations between the coupled systems. Our formalism is particularly useful where systems are coupled to one another predominantly in a self-consistent fashion. First, we develop exact master equations for two coupled systems, taking as our prototype the dynamical problem of quantum optics, where a spatially extended collection of two-level atoms interact with a multimode optical field. We then generalize our results to $N$ coupled systems, taking as our prototype the kinetics of a classical nonideal gas interacting through two-body forces, and derive exact master equations for the system. We then consider as examples several approximate theories resulting from our exact equations. In the case of the imperfect gas we investigate the low-density limit and show how Bogoliubov's form of the Boltzmann equation emerges from our formalism, as well as corrections due to Klimontovich. We consider as special cases of our exact quantum-optical equations the equations in the first Born approximation, with and without memory, and show how several existing quantum-optical master equations are contained in our general results. As a second example in quantum optics, we consider the case where the predominant behavior of the system is described by the self-consistent-field or coupled Bloch and Maxwell equations and derive a first-order perturbation description for deviations from self-consistent-field behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.9.1343

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The frequency shift in the Markovian master equation for the damped harmonic oscillator is independent of temperature.

    “Note that the shift is independent of the temperature, and although its effect is typically small (e.g.[3,18]), we will not neglect it in our study.”

    From Markovian master equations: a critical study (2010) · cites this paper as [3]

  • Any interaction Hamiltonian operator A_k can be decomposed into a sum of eigenoperators of the superoperator [H_S, •].

    “where each A k can be decomposed into a sum of eigenoperators of the superoperator [H S , •],”

    From Markovian master equations: a critical study (2010) · cites this paper as [3]

  • By construction, the steady state of equation (59) is the thermal state of the composed system.

    “By construction, the steady state of equation ( 59) is the thermal state of the composed system [3,4]”

    From Markovian master equations: a critical study (2010) · cites this paper as [3]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willis, C. R., & Picard, R. H.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1974-03-01
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
1343-1358
ISSN
0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025779473
Cited by
185
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
Keywords
master equation, coupled systems, reduced density operator, quantum optics, two-level atom, real gases, Boltzmann equation, Bogoliubov approximation, first Born approximation, memory effects, self-consistent field approximation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review