The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making the decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution practically useful
Open accessAbstract
The relatively low key rate seems to be the major barrier to its practical use for the decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD). We present a four-intensity protocol for the decoy-state MDI-QKD that hugely raises the key rate, especially in the case in which the total data size is not large. Also, calculations show that our method makes it possible for secure private communication with fresh keys generated from MDI-QKD with a delay time of only a few seconds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
Cited by
Advances in quantum cryptography
Pirandola, S., Andersen, U. L., Banchi, L., Berta, M., Bunandar, D., Colbeck, R., Englund, D., Gehring, T., Lupo, C., Ottaviani, C., et al. (2020) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.361502 · Cited by 2,033
Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices
Xu, F., Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Lo, H.-K., & Pan, J.-W. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.025002 · Cited by 1,543
Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution Over a 404 km Optical Fiber
Yin, H.-L., Chen, T.-Y., Yu, Z.-W., Liu, H., You, L.-X., Zhou, Y.-H., Chen, S.-J., Mao, Y., Huang, M.-Q., Zhang, W.-J., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.190501 · Cited by 836
Self-citationTwin-field quantum key distribution with large misalignment error
Wang, X.-B., Yu, Z.-W., & Hu, X.-L. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.062323 · Cited by 394
Self-citationExperimental quantum key distribution beyond the repeaterless secret key capacity
Minder, M., Pittaluga, M., Roberts, G. L., Lucamarini, M., Dynes, J. F., Yuan, Z. L., & Shields, A. J. (2019) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0377-7 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, Y.-H., Yu, Z.-W., & Wang, X.-B.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2016-04-18
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9926
- 2469-9934
- OpenAlex
- W1677861335
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making the decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution practically useful. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.93.042324
- The paper
- Zhou, Y.-H., Yu, Z.-W., & Wang, X.-B. (2016). Making the decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution practically useful. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.93.042324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
