The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Twin-field quantum key distribution with large misalignment error
Open accessAbstract
Based on the novel idea of twin-field quantum key distribution [TF-QKD; Lucamarini et al., Nature (London) 557, 400 (2018)], we present a protocol named the ``sending or not sending TF-QKD'' protocol, which can tolerate large misalignment error. A revolutionary theoretical breakthrough in quantum communication, TF-QKD changes the channel-loss dependence of the key rate from linear to square root of channel transmittance. However, it demands the challenging technology of long-distance single-photon interference, and also, as stated in the original paper, the security proof was not finalized there due to the possible effects of the later announced phase information. Here we show by a concrete eavesdropping scheme that the later phase announcement does have important effects and the traditional formulas of the decoy-state method do not apply to the original protocol. We then present our ``sending or not sending'' protocol. Our protocol does not take postselection for the bits in $Z$-basis (signal pulses), and hence the traditional decoy-state method directly applies and automatically resolves the issue of security proof. Most importantly, our protocol presents a negligibly small error rate in $Z$-basis because it does not request any single-photon interference in this basis. Thus our protocol greatly improves the tolerable threshold of misalignment error in single-photon interference from the original a few percent to more than $45%$. As shown numerically, our protocol exceeds a secure distance of 700, 600, 500, or 300 km even though the single-photon interference misalignment error rate is as large as $15%, 25%, 35%$, or $45%$.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
The security of practical quantum key distribution
Scarani, V., Bechmann-Pasquinucci, H., Cerf, N. J., Dušek, M., Lütkenhaus, N., & Peev, M. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1301 · Cited by 3,726
Simple Proof of Security of the BB84 Quantum Key Distribution Protocol
Shor, P. W., & Preskill, J. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.441 · Cited by 3,047
Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution
Lo, H.-K., Curty, M., & Qi, B. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.130503 · Cited by 2,239
Gisin, N., & Thew, R. (2007) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2007.22 · Cited by 2,147
Decoy state quantum key distribution
Lo, H.-K., Ma, X., & Chen, K. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.230504 · Cited by 2,138
Quantum Key Distribution with High Loss: Toward Global Secure Communication
Hwang, W.-Y. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.057901 · Cited by 1,807
Beating the Photon-Number-Splitting Attack in Practical Quantum Cryptography
Wang, X.-B. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.230503 · Cited by 1,500
Self-citationOvercoming the rate–distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters
Lucamarini, M., Yuan, Z. L., Dynes, J. F., & Shields, A. J. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0066-6 · Cited by 1,247
Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution Over a 404 km Optical Fiber
Yin, H.-L., Chen, T.-Y., Yu, Z.-W., Liu, H., You, L.-X., Zhou, Y.-H., Chen, S.-J., Mao, Y., Huang, M.-Q., Zhang, W.-J., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.190501 · Cited by 836
Self-citation
Cited by
Advances in quantum cryptography
Pirandola, S., Andersen, U. L., Banchi, L., Berta, M., Bunandar, D., Colbeck, R., Englund, D., Gehring, T., Lupo, C., Ottaviani, C., et al. (2020) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.361502 · Cited by 2,033
Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices
Xu, F., Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Lo, H.-K., & Pan, J.-W. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.025002 · Cited by 1,543
Chen, J.-P., Zhang, C., Liu, Y., Jiang, C., Zhang, W., Hu, X.-L., Guan, J.-Y., Yu, Z.-W., Xu, H., Lin, J., et al. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.070501 · Cited by 380
Self-citationExperimental quantum key distribution beyond the repeaterless secret key capacity
Minder, M., Pittaluga, M., Roberts, G. L., Lucamarini, M., Dynes, J. F., Yuan, Z. L., & Shields, A. J. (2019) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0377-7 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X.-B., Yu, Z.-W., & Hu, X.-L.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2018-12-18
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9926
- 2469-9934
- OpenAlex
- W2803691034
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 17.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Twin-field quantum key distribution with large misalignment error. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.98.062323
- The paper
- Wang, X.-B., Yu, Z.-W., & Hu, X.-L. (2018). Twin-field quantum key distribution with large misalignment error. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.98.062323
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.