CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 71Laser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsAtomic and Molecular PhysicsSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies

Noncollinear wave mixing of attosecond XUV and few-cycle optical laser pulses in gas-phase atoms: Toward multidimensional spectroscopy involving XUV excitations

Open access
Cao, Wei, Warrick, Erika R., Fidler, Ashley, Neumark, Daniel M., Leone, Stephen R.·2016·Physical Review A
DOI 10.1103/physreva.94.053846
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Ultrafast nonlinear spectroscopy, which records transient wave-mixing signals in a medium, is a powerful tool to access microscopic information using light sources in the radio-frequency and optical regimes. The extension of this technique towards the extreme ultraviolet (XUV) or even x-ray regimes holds the promise to uncover rich structural or dynamical information with even higher spatial or temporal resolution. Here, we demonstrate noncollinear wave mixing between weak XUV attosecond pulses and a strong near-infrared (NIR) few-cycle laser pulse in gas phase atoms (one photon of XUV and two photons of NIR). In the noncollinear geometry the attosecond and either one or two NIR pulses interact with argon atoms. Nonlinear XUV signals are generated in a spatially resolved fashion as required by phase matching. Different transition pathways can be identified from these background-free nonlinear signals according to the specific phase-matching conditions. Time-resolved measurements of the spatially gated XUV signals reveal electronic coherences of Rydberg wave packets prepared by a single XUV photon or XUV-NIR two-photon excitation, depending on the applied pulse sequences. These measurements open possible applications of tabletop multidimensional spectroscopy to the study of dynamics associated with valence or core excitation with XUV photons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.94.053846

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The recent advance of wave-vector matched, noncollinear attosecond four-wave mixing of XUV pulses with optical pulses is a propitious step towards multidimensional coherent spectroscopies.

    “The recent advance of wave-vector matched, noncollinear attosecond four-wave mixing of XUV pulses with optical pulses is a propitious step towards multidimensional coherent spectroscopies [224] (figure 27).”

    From Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics (2018) · cites this paper as [224]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. W. P. Aue, E. Bartholdi, and Richard R. Ernst, J. Chem. Phys. 64, 2229 (1976)
  2. N. Bloembergen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 685(1982)
  3. N. A. Kurnit, I. D. Abella, and S. R. Hartmann. Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 567 (1964)
  4. E J Brown, Q Zhang, and M. Dantus, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 5772 (1999)
  5. W. M. Tolles, J. W. Nibler, J. R. McDonald, and A. B. Harvey, Appl. Spectrosc. 31, 253(1977)
  6. C. C. Hayden and D. W. Chandler, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 10465 (1995)
  7. M. Schmitt, G. Knopp, A. Materny and W. Kiefer, Chem. Phys. Lett. 270, 9 (1997)
  8. P Hamm, M Lim, and R M. Hochstrasser, J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 6123 (1998)
  9. S Mukamel, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem, 51, 691(2000)
  10. J C Wright, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 62, 209 (2012)
  11. M. Schmitt, G. Knopp, A. Materny, and W. Kiefer. Chem. Phys. Lett. 280, 339(1997)
  12. S. Tanaka, V. Chernyak, and S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. A 63, 063405 (2001)
  13. S. Tanaka, and S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 043001 (2002)
  14. I. V. Schweigert, and S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 163001 (2007).
  15. S. Mukamel et al. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 64, 101 (2013)
  16. F. Bencivenga et al, Nature 520, 205 (2015).
  17. P. Antoine, A. L'huillier, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1234 (1996).
  18. P. M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger, Genevive Mullot, F. Augé, Ph Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P. Agostini, Science 292, 1689 (2001).
  19. K. Schiessl, K. L. Ishikawa, E. Persson, and J. Burgdörfer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 253903(2007)
  20. E. Constant, D. Garzella, P. Breger, E. Mével, Ch. Dorrer, C. Le Blanc, F. Salin and P. Agostini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1668 (1999).
  21. A. R. Beck, D. M. Neumark, and S. R. Leone, Chem. Phys. Lett. 624, 119 (2015).
  22. M. Chini, X. Wang, Y. Cheng, Y. Wu, D. Zhao, D. A. Telnov, Shih-I. Chu, and Z. Chang, Sci. Rep. 3, 1105 (2013).
  23. S. Chen, M. Wu, M. B. Gaarde, and K. J. Schafer, Phys. Rev. A 87, 033408 (2013).
  24. A. Blättermann, C. Ott, A. Kaldun, T. Ding, and T. Pfeifer, J. Phys. B 47, 124008 (2014).
  25. A. R. Beck, B. Bernhardt, E. R. Warrick, M. Wu, S. Chen, M. B. Gaarde, K. J. Schafer, D. M. Neumark, and S. R. Leone, New J. of Phys. 16, 113016 (2014).
  26. W. Cao, E. R. Warrick, D. M. Neumark, and S. R. Leone, New J. of Phys. 18, 013041 (2016).
  27. T. Ding et al, Opt. Lett. 41, 709 (2016).
  28. J E Bækhøj, L Yue and L B Madsen, Phys. Rev. A 91, 043408 (2015)
  29. M. Reduzzi et al. J. Phys. B 49, 065102 (2016)
  30. E. R. Warrick, Wei Cao, Daniel M. Neumark, and Stephen R. Leone, J. Phys. Chem. A 120, 3165(2016).
  31. W. Cao, E. R. Warrick, A Fidler, S. R. Leone and D. M. Neumark, Phys. Rev. A 91, 021802 (2016)
  32. S Chen , M Wu, M B Gaarde and K J Schafer, Phys. Rev. A 88, 033409 (2013)
  33. C Ott, A Kaldun, P Raith, K Meyer, M Laux, J Evers, C. H. Keitel, C H Greene and T Pfeifer, Science 340, 716 (2013)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Cao, W., Warrick, E. R., Fidler, A., Neumark, D. M., & Leone, S. R.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
ORCID
Venue
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2016-11-23
Volume
94
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9926
  • 2469-9934
DOI
10.1103/physreva.94.053846
OpenAlex
W2549633085
Cited by
71
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Molecular Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Keywords
attosecond XUV pulses, few-cycle pulses, multidimensional spectroscopy, Rydberg wave packets, electronic coherence, argon atoms, phase matching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review