Fast quantum computation at arbitrarily low energy
Open accessAbstract
One version of the energy-time uncertainty principle states that the minimum time ${T}_{\ensuremath{\perp}}$ for a quantum system to evolve from a given state to any orthogonal state is $h/(4\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}E)$, where $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}E$ is the energy uncertainty. A related bound called the Margolus-Levitin theorem states that ${T}_{\ensuremath{\perp}}\ensuremath{\ge}h/(2\ensuremath{\langle}E\ensuremath{\rangle})$, where $\ensuremath{\langle}E\ensuremath{\rangle}$ is the expectation value of energy and the ground energy is taken to be zero. Many subsequent works have interpreted ${T}_{\ensuremath{\perp}}$ as defining a minimal time for an elementary computational operation and correspondingly a fundamental limit on clock speed determined by a system's energy. Here we present local time-independent Hamiltonians in which computational clock speed becomes arbitrarily large relative to $\ensuremath{\langle}E\ensuremath{\rangle}$ and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}E$ as the number of computational steps goes to infinity. We argue that energy considerations alone are not sufficient to obtain an upper bound on computational speed, and that additional physical assumptions such as limits to information density and information transmission speed are necessary to obtain such a bound.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Jordan pointed out that energy alone does not determine computational speed; additional assumptions about information density and transmission speed are needed.
“More recently, Jordan [98] further pointed out that energy considerations alone are not sufficient to determine the computational speed.For realistic bounds additional assumptions about the information density and information transmission speed are necessary”
From Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control (2017) · cites this paper as [98]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Ultimate physical limits to computation
Lloyd, S. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35023282 · Cited by 1,120 · see citing works
The maximum speed of dynamical evolution
Margolus, N., & Levitin, L. B. (1998) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(98)00054-2 · Cited by 887 · see citing works
Computational Capacity of the Universe
Lloyd, S. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.237901 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Adiabatic Quantum Computation Is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Computation
Aharonov, D., van Dam, W., Kempe, J., Landau, Z., Lloyd, S., & Regev, O. (2008) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/080734479 · Cited by 395 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Hamiltonian to execute quantum computation “ballistically” as in Feynman’s original construction [32] not adiabatically as in [33].”
Fundamental Limit on the Rate of Quantum Dynamics: The Unified Bound Is Tight
Levitin, L. B., & Toffoli, T. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.160502 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
A unitarity bound on the evolution of nonstationary states
Fleming, G. N. (1973) · Il Nuovo Cimento A · doi:10.1007/bf02819419 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
The rate of evolution of a quantum state
Uffink, J. (1993) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.17368 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Quantum Algorithms for Fermionic Quantum Field TheoriesPreprint
Jordan, S. P., Lee, K. S. M., & Preskill, J. P. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1404.7115 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationAdiabatic Quantum Computation is Equivalent to Standard Quantum ComputationPreprint
Aharonov, D., van Dam, W., Kempe, J., Landau, Z. A., Lloyd, S., & Regev, O. (2004) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0405098 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Quantum Computation of Scattering in Scalar Quantum Field TheoriesPreprint
Jordan, S. P., Lee, K. S. M., & Preskill, J. P. (2011) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1112.4833 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationFundamental gravitational limitations to quantum computingPreprint
Gambini, R., Porto, R. A., & Pullin, J. A. (2005) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0507262 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Complexity, action, and black holes
Brown, A. R., Roberts, D. A., Susskind, L., et al. (2015) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.04993 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- [1][1] L. Mandelstam and I. Tamm. The uncertainty relation between energy and time in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. Journal of Physics (USSR) , 9:249-254, 1945. -
- [3][3] J. Anandan and Y. Aharonov. Geometry of quantum evolution. Physical Review Letters , 65:1697-1700, 1990. -
- [4][4] Lev Vaidman. Minimum time for the evolution to an orthogonal quantum state. Americal Journal of Physics , 60:182-183, 1992. -
- [8][8] P. Pfeifer. How fast can a quantum state change with time? Physical Review Letters , 70:33653368, 1993. -
- [9][9] Samuel Braunstein, Carl Caves, and Gerard Milburn. Generalized uncertainty relations: theory, examples, and Lorentz invariance. Annals of Physics , 247:135-173, 1996. -
- [10][10] Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, and Lorenzo Maccone. Quantum limits to dynamical evolution. Physical Review A , 67:052109, 2003. -
- [12][12] Michael R. Frey. Quantum speed limits-primer, perspectives, and potential future directions. Quantum Information Processing , 15(10):3919-3950, 2016. -
- [15][15] Seth Lloyd and Jack Ng. Black hole computers. Scientific American , 291(5):52-61, November 2004. -
- [17][17] Michael P. Frank. The physical limits of computing. Computing in Science and Engineering , 4(3):16-26, 2002. -
- [18][18] Norman Margolus. Looking at nature as a computer. International Journal of Theoretical Physics , 42(2):309-327, 2003. -
- [19][19] Adam R. Brown, Daniel A. Roberts, Leonard Susskind, Brian Swingle, and Ying Zhao. Holographic complexity equals bulk action? Physical Review Letters , 116:191301, 2016. arXiv:1509.07876. - · arXiv
- [21][21] Stephen D. H. Hsu. Physical limits on information processing. Physics Letters B , 641(1):99100, 2006. arXiv:hep-th/0607082. - · arXiv
- [22][22] Stephen D. H. Hsu. Information, information processing, and gravity. International Journal of Modern Physics A , 22(17&17):2895-2907, 2007. arXiv:0704.1154. - · arXiv
- [24][24] Michael P. Frank. On the interpretation of energy as the rate of quantum computation. Quantum Information Processing , 4(4):283-334, 2005. -
- [25][25] Y. Jack Ng. Spacetime foam: from entropy and holography to infinite statistics and nonlocality. Entropy , 10(4):441-461, 2008. arXiv:0801.2962. - · arXiv
- [27][27] Hans J. Bremermann. Minimum energy requirements of information transfer and computing. International Journal of Theoretical Physics , 21(3):203-217, 1982. -
- [28][28] J. D. Bekenstein. Energy cost of information transfer. Physical Review Letters , 46:623, 1981. -
- [29][29] L. B. Levitin. Physical limitations of rate, depth, and minimum energy in information processing. International Journal of Theoretical Physics , 21:299-309, 1982. -
- [30][30] Yosi Atia and Dorit Aharonov. Fast-forwarding of Hamiltonians and exponentially precise measurements. arXiv:1610.09619 , 2016. - · arXiv
- [31][31] Charles H. Bennett and Rolf Landauer. The fundamental physical limits of computation. Scientific American , 253(1):48-56, 1985. -
- [32][32] Richard P. Feynman. Quantum mechanical computers. Optics News , 11(2):11-20, 1985. -
- [35][35] Rolando Somma and Sergio Boixo. Spectral gap amplification. SIAM Journal on Computing , 42:593-610, 2013. arXiv:1110.2494. - · arXiv
- [36][36] Daniel Nagaj. Universal two-body-Hamiltonian quantum computing. Physical Review A , 85:032330, 2012. arXiv:1002.0420. - · arXiv
- [37][37] Thomas M. Cover. Enumerative source encoding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , IT-19(1):73-77, 1971. -
- [38][38] Stephen P. Jordan, Keith S. M. Lee, and John Preskill. Quantum algorithms for quantum field theories. Science , 336(6085):1130-1133, 2012. arXiv:1111.3633. - · arXiv
- [41][41] Jacob D. Bekenstein. Black holes and entropy. Physical Review D , 7(8):2333-2346, 1973. -
- [42][42] Jacob D. Bekenstein. Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems. Physical Review D , 23:287, 1981. -
- [43][43] Raphael Bousso. The holographic principle. Reviews of Modern Physics , 74:825-874, 2002. arXiv:hep-th/0203101. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control
Deffner, S., & Campbell, S. (2017) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa86c6 · Cited by 585 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jordan, S. P.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jordan, Stephen P.
- ORCID
- Jordan, Stephen P.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2017-03-06
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9926
- 2469-9934
- OpenAlex
- W2571396320
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- quantum computing, time-independent Hamiltonian, clock speed, energy uncertainty, information density
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review