Cited by 40Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Fast quantum computation at arbitrarily low energy

Open access
Jordan, Stephen P.·2017·Physical Review A

Abstract

One version of the energy-time uncertainty principle states that the minimum time ${T}_{\ensuremath{\perp}}$ for a quantum system to evolve from a given state to any orthogonal state is $h/(4\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}E)$, where $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}E$ is the energy uncertainty. A related bound called the Margolus-Levitin theorem states that ${T}_{\ensuremath{\perp}}\ensuremath{\ge}h/(2\ensuremath{\langle}E\ensuremath{\rangle})$, where $\ensuremath{\langle}E\ensuremath{\rangle}$ is the expectation value of energy and the ground energy is taken to be zero. Many subsequent works have interpreted ${T}_{\ensuremath{\perp}}$ as defining a minimal time for an elementary computational operation and correspondingly a fundamental limit on clock speed determined by a system's energy. Here we present local time-independent Hamiltonians in which computational clock speed becomes arbitrarily large relative to $\ensuremath{\langle}E\ensuremath{\rangle}$ and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}E$ as the number of computational steps goes to infinity. We argue that energy considerations alone are not sufficient to obtain an upper bound on computational speed, and that additional physical assumptions such as limits to information density and information transmission speed are necessary to obtain such a bound.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.95.032305

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jordan pointed out that energy alone does not determine computational speed; additional assumptions about information density and transmission speed are needed.

    “More recently, Jordan [98] further pointed out that energy considerations alone are not sufficient to determine the computational speed.For realistic bounds additional assumptions about the information density and information transmission speed are necessary”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. [1][1] L. Mandelstam and I. Tamm. The uncertainty relation between energy and time in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. Journal of Physics (USSR) , 9:249-254, 1945. -
  2. [3][3] J. Anandan and Y. Aharonov. Geometry of quantum evolution. Physical Review Letters , 65:1697-1700, 1990. -
  3. [4][4] Lev Vaidman. Minimum time for the evolution to an orthogonal quantum state. Americal Journal of Physics , 60:182-183, 1992. -
  4. [8][8] P. Pfeifer. How fast can a quantum state change with time? Physical Review Letters , 70:33653368, 1993. -
  5. [9][9] Samuel Braunstein, Carl Caves, and Gerard Milburn. Generalized uncertainty relations: theory, examples, and Lorentz invariance. Annals of Physics , 247:135-173, 1996. -
  6. [10][10] Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, and Lorenzo Maccone. Quantum limits to dynamical evolution. Physical Review A , 67:052109, 2003. -
  7. [12][12] Michael R. Frey. Quantum speed limits-primer, perspectives, and potential future directions. Quantum Information Processing , 15(10):3919-3950, 2016. -
  8. [15][15] Seth Lloyd and Jack Ng. Black hole computers. Scientific American , 291(5):52-61, November 2004. -
  9. [17][17] Michael P. Frank. The physical limits of computing. Computing in Science and Engineering , 4(3):16-26, 2002. -
  10. [18][18] Norman Margolus. Looking at nature as a computer. International Journal of Theoretical Physics , 42(2):309-327, 2003. -
  11. [19][19] Adam R. Brown, Daniel A. Roberts, Leonard Susskind, Brian Swingle, and Ying Zhao. Holographic complexity equals bulk action? Physical Review Letters , 116:191301, 2016. arXiv:1509.07876. - · arXiv
  12. [21][21] Stephen D. H. Hsu. Physical limits on information processing. Physics Letters B , 641(1):99100, 2006. arXiv:hep-th/0607082. - · arXiv
  13. [22][22] Stephen D. H. Hsu. Information, information processing, and gravity. International Journal of Modern Physics A , 22(17&17):2895-2907, 2007. arXiv:0704.1154. - · arXiv
  14. [24][24] Michael P. Frank. On the interpretation of energy as the rate of quantum computation. Quantum Information Processing , 4(4):283-334, 2005. -
  15. [25][25] Y. Jack Ng. Spacetime foam: from entropy and holography to infinite statistics and nonlocality. Entropy , 10(4):441-461, 2008. arXiv:0801.2962. - · arXiv
  16. [27][27] Hans J. Bremermann. Minimum energy requirements of information transfer and computing. International Journal of Theoretical Physics , 21(3):203-217, 1982. -
  17. [28][28] J. D. Bekenstein. Energy cost of information transfer. Physical Review Letters , 46:623, 1981. -
  18. [29][29] L. B. Levitin. Physical limitations of rate, depth, and minimum energy in information processing. International Journal of Theoretical Physics , 21:299-309, 1982. -
  19. [30][30] Yosi Atia and Dorit Aharonov. Fast-forwarding of Hamiltonians and exponentially precise measurements. arXiv:1610.09619 , 2016. - · arXiv
  20. [31][31] Charles H. Bennett and Rolf Landauer. The fundamental physical limits of computation. Scientific American , 253(1):48-56, 1985. -
  21. [32][32] Richard P. Feynman. Quantum mechanical computers. Optics News , 11(2):11-20, 1985. -
  22. [35][35] Rolando Somma and Sergio Boixo. Spectral gap amplification. SIAM Journal on Computing , 42:593-610, 2013. arXiv:1110.2494. - · arXiv
  23. [36][36] Daniel Nagaj. Universal two-body-Hamiltonian quantum computing. Physical Review A , 85:032330, 2012. arXiv:1002.0420. - · arXiv
  24. [37][37] Thomas M. Cover. Enumerative source encoding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , IT-19(1):73-77, 1971. -
  25. [38][38] Stephen P. Jordan, Keith S. M. Lee, and John Preskill. Quantum algorithms for quantum field theories. Science , 336(6085):1130-1133, 2012. arXiv:1111.3633. - · arXiv
  26. [41][41] Jacob D. Bekenstein. Black holes and entropy. Physical Review D , 7(8):2333-2346, 1973. -
  27. [42][42] Jacob D. Bekenstein. Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems. Physical Review D , 23:287, 1981. -
  28. [43][43] Raphael Bousso. The holographic principle. Reviews of Modern Physics , 74:825-874, 2002. arXiv:hep-th/0203101. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jordan, S. P.
Affiliations
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Jordan, Stephen P.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2017-03-06
Volume
95
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9926
  • 2469-9934
OpenAlex
W2571396320
Cited by
40
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
quantum computing, time-independent Hamiltonian, clock speed, energy uncertainty, information density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review