Cited by 47Optical Polarization and EllipsometryOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsMolecular spectroscopy and chirality

Structure of polarimetric purity of three-dimensional polarization states

Open access
Gil, José J., Friberg, Ari T., Setälä, Tero, San José, Ignacio·2017·Physical Review A

Abstract

It has recently been demonstrated that a general three-dimensional (3D) polarization state cannot be considered an incoherent superposition of (1) a pure state, (2) a two-dimensional unpolarized state, and (3) a 3D unpolarized state [J. J. Gil, Phys. Rev. A 90, 043858 (2014)]. This fact is intimately linked to the existence of 3D polarization states with fluctuating directions of propagation, but whose associated polarization matrices R satisfy rank $\mathbf{R}=2$. In this work, such peculiar states are analyzed and characterized, leading to a meaningful general classification and interpretation of 3D polarization states. Within this theoretical framework, the interrelations among the more significant polarization descriptors presented in the literature, as well as their respective physical interpretations, are studied and illustrated with examples, providing a better understanding of the structure of polarimetric purity of any kind of polarization state.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.95.053856

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In general, the middle component R_m of the characteristic decomposition of a 3D polarization matrix exhibits nonzero circular and linear degrees of polarization.

    “it is found that, in general, R m exhibits nonzero circular and linear degrees of polarization.”

    From Polarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization (2018) · cites this paper as [10]

    Section II.C states that the circular degree of polarization of a nonregular R_m is necessarily nonzero. Its expression for the linear degree, however, does not establish that it is nonzero; Section II.D also identifies a regular case in which R_m is a 2D unpolarized state. The claim’s linear-polarization part is therefore not fully supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Polarization states can be classified into regular and nonregular states depending on whether R_m is a real matrix or not.

    “In fact, polarization states can be classified into two types depending on whether ˆ R m is a real matrix ( regular states ) or not ( nonregular states ) [10].”

    From Polarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization (2018) · cites this paper as [10]

    Section II.D states that a state is regular if and only if R_m is real, and that nonregular states have a nonreal R_m. It also identifies an exception: when P₁ = P₂, R_m is absent from the decomposition, yet the state is regular. The claimed test therefore does not apply to all polarization states. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For nonregular states, R_m corresponds to an equiprobable mixture of two mutually orthogonal states whose polarization ellipses lie in different planes, and therefore R_m does not represent a 2D unpolarized state and exhibits nonzero contribution to Pc and Pl.

    “In the case of nonregular states, ˆ R m corresponds to an equiprobable mixture of two mutually orthogonal states whose polarization ellipses lie in different planes, and therefore ˆ R m does not represent a 2D unpolarized state, and exhibits nonzero contribution to Pc and Pl [10].”

    From Polarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization (2018) · cites this paper as [10]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For regular states, R_m always represents a 2D unpolarized state, i.e., an equiprobable mixture of two mutually orthogonal states whose polarization ellipses lie in the same plane, and therefore R_m does not contribute to either Pl or Pc.

    “In the case of regular states ˆ R m always represents a 2D unpolarized state. In other words, it can be considered an equiprobable mixture of two mutually orthogonal states whose polarization ellipses lie in the same plane, and therefore the polarization ellipse of ˆ R m evolves fully randomly but remains in a fixed plane. Thus, for regular states, ˆ R m does not contribute to either Pl or Pc .”

    From Polarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization (2018) · cites this paper as [10]

    Section II.D says that, when present in a regular state's characteristic decomposition, R_m is a 2D unpolarized state. Sections II.A–B describe such a state as an equal mixture of two orthogonal pure states in a fixed plane, with P_l = P_c = 0. The qualification is that Section II.D also identifies regular states with P_1 = P_2, for which the R_m component is absent; thus “always represents” is too broad. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The degree of elliptical purity Pe summarizes all contributions to polarimetric purity derived from the degrees of linear and circular purity, i.e., all contributions except the purity due to the degree of directionality Pd.

    “where the degree of elliptical purity Pe ≡ √ P 2 l + P 2 c [10] summarizes all the contributions to polarimetric purity derived from the degrees of linear and circular purity (that is, all the contributions except for the purity due to the degree of directionality Pd ).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. C. Brosseau and A. Dogariu, Symmetry properties and polar- ization descriptors for an arbitrary electromagnetic wavefield, in Progress in Optics, edited by E. Wolf (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006), Vol. 49, Chap. 4.
  2. J. J. Gil, J. M. Correas, P. A. Melero, and C. Ferreira, Generalized polarization algebra, Monografías del Seminario Matemático García de Galdeano 31, 161 (2004), available from http://www.unizar.es/galdeano/ actas_pau/PDFVIII/pp161-167.pdf.
  3. W. A. Holm and R. M. Barnes, On radar polarization mixed target state decomposition techniques, in Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE USA Radar Conference (IEEE, New York, 1988), p. 249.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gil, J. J., Friberg, A. T., Setälä, T., & San José, I.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2017-05-24
Volume
95
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9926
  • 2469-9934
OpenAlex
W2618126927
Cited by
47
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • Zaguan (Universidad de Zaragoza) (submittedVersion)
  • UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (FIS2014-58303-P)
  • Suomen Akatemia (268480, 268705)
  • Joensuun Yliopiston Tukisäätiö
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
Keywords
incoherent superposition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review