Structure of polarimetric purity of three-dimensional polarization states
Open accessAbstract
It has recently been demonstrated that a general three-dimensional (3D) polarization state cannot be considered an incoherent superposition of (1) a pure state, (2) a two-dimensional unpolarized state, and (3) a 3D unpolarized state [J. J. Gil, Phys. Rev. A 90, 043858 (2014)]. This fact is intimately linked to the existence of 3D polarization states with fluctuating directions of propagation, but whose associated polarization matrices R satisfy rank $\mathbf{R}=2$. In this work, such peculiar states are analyzed and characterized, leading to a meaningful general classification and interpretation of 3D polarization states. Within this theoretical framework, the interrelations among the more significant polarization descriptors presented in the literature, as well as their respective physical interpretations, are studied and illustrated with examples, providing a better understanding of the structure of polarimetric purity of any kind of polarization state.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In general, the middle component R_m of the characteristic decomposition of a 3D polarization matrix exhibits nonzero circular and linear degrees of polarization.
“it is found that, in general, R m exhibits nonzero circular and linear degrees of polarization.”
From Polarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization (2018) · cites this paper as [10]
Section II.C states that the circular degree of polarization of a nonregular R_m is necessarily nonzero. Its expression for the linear degree, however, does not establish that it is nonzero; Section II.D also identifies a regular case in which R_m is a 2D unpolarized state. The claim’s linear-polarization part is therefore not fully supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.81)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPolarization states can be classified into regular and nonregular states depending on whether R_m is a real matrix or not.
“In fact, polarization states can be classified into two types depending on whether ˆ R m is a real matrix ( regular states ) or not ( nonregular states ) [10].”
From Polarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization (2018) · cites this paper as [10]
Section II.D states that a state is regular if and only if R_m is real, and that nonregular states have a nonreal R_m. It also identifies an exception: when P₁ = P₂, R_m is absent from the decomposition, yet the state is regular. The claimed test therefore does not apply to all polarization states. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFor nonregular states, R_m corresponds to an equiprobable mixture of two mutually orthogonal states whose polarization ellipses lie in different planes, and therefore R_m does not represent a 2D unpolarized state and exhibits nonzero contribution to Pc and Pl.
“In the case of nonregular states, ˆ R m corresponds to an equiprobable mixture of two mutually orthogonal states whose polarization ellipses lie in different planes, and therefore ˆ R m does not represent a 2D unpolarized state, and exhibits nonzero contribution to Pc and Pl [10].”
From Polarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization (2018) · cites this paper as [10]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFor regular states, R_m always represents a 2D unpolarized state, i.e., an equiprobable mixture of two mutually orthogonal states whose polarization ellipses lie in the same plane, and therefore R_m does not contribute to either Pl or Pc.
“In the case of regular states ˆ R m always represents a 2D unpolarized state. In other words, it can be considered an equiprobable mixture of two mutually orthogonal states whose polarization ellipses lie in the same plane, and therefore the polarization ellipse of ˆ R m evolves fully randomly but remains in a fixed plane. Thus, for regular states, ˆ R m does not contribute to either Pl or Pc .”
From Polarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization (2018) · cites this paper as [10]
Section II.D says that, when present in a regular state's characteristic decomposition, R_m is a 2D unpolarized state. Sections II.A–B describe such a state as an equal mixture of two orthogonal pure states in a fixed plane, with P_l = P_c = 0. The qualification is that Section II.D also identifies regular states with P_1 = P_2, for which the R_m component is absent; thus “always represents” is too broad. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe degree of elliptical purity Pe summarizes all contributions to polarimetric purity derived from the degrees of linear and circular purity, i.e., all contributions except the purity due to the degree of directionality Pd.
“where the degree of elliptical purity Pe ≡ √ P 2 l + P 2 c [10] summarizes all the contributions to polarimetric purity derived from the degrees of linear and circular purity (that is, all the contributions except for the purity due to the degree of directionality Pd ).”
From Polarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization (2018) · cites this paper as [10]
A privileged view of the structure of polarimetric purity of R is given by its characteristic (or trivial) decomposition.
“among the different possible representations of R as compositions of mutually incoherent states, a privileged view of the structure of polarimetric purity of R is given by its characteristic (or trivial ) decomposition [2,10,18],”
From Polarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization (2018) · cites this paper as [10]
P1 does not satisfy all the required properties to be associated to a 3D degree of polarimetric purity because in general P1 ≠ Pe (nonregular states) and the equality P1=0 does not imply that R=R_u-3D.
“Fromtheaboveanalysisweconcludethat P 1 doesnotsatisfy all the required properties to be associated to a 3D degree of polarimetric purity, because (a) in general P 1 ̸= Pe (nonregular states) and therefore the contributions of ˆ R m to linear and circular degrees of polarization are not included in P 1 [10], and (b) the equality P 1 = 0 does not imply that necessarily R = R u -3D.”
From Polarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization (2018) · cites this paper as [10]
An example of a nonregular state is any state R whose component R_m is given by an equiprobable mixture R_cl of a circularly polarized state and a linearly polarized state whose electric field vibrates in a direction orthogonal to the plane containing the polarization ellipse of the circular component.
“An example of a nonregular state (see Fig. 1) is any state R whose component ˆ R m is given by an equiprobable mixture ˆ R cl of a circularly polarized state and a linearly polarized state whose electric field vibrates in a direction that is orthogonal to the plane containing the polarization ellipse (circle) of the circular component [10].”
From Polarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization (2018) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810817 · Cited by 25,760 · see citing works
A review of target decomposition theorems in radar polarimetry
Cloude, S., & Pottier, E. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.485127 · Cited by 2,734 · see citing works
Degree of polarization for optical near fields
Setälä, T., Shevchenko, A., Kaivola, M., & Friberg, A. T. (2002) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.66.016615 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Self-citationGil, J. J. (2007) · The European Physical Journal Applied Physics · doi:10.1051/epjap:2007153 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Self-citationGeneralized Stokes parameters of random electromagnetic beams
Korotkova, O., & Wolf, E. (2005) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.30.000198 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Descriptions of the Polarization States of Vector Processes: Applications to ULF Magnetic Fields
Samson, J. C. (1973) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1973.tb02404.x · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Degree of Polarization in Near Fields of Thermal Sources: Effects of Surface Waves
Setälä, T., Kaivola, M., & Friberg, A. T. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.123902 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationParameters characterizing electromagnetic wave polarization
Carozzi, T. D., Karlsson, R., & Bergman, J. (2000) · Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · doi:10.1103/physreve.61.2024 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Polarized Light and the Mueller Matrix Approach
Gil, J. J., & Ossikovski, R. (2022) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780367815578 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationDegree of polarization of statistically stationary electromagnetic fields
Ellis, J., Dogariu, A. C., Ponomarenko, S. A., & Wolf, E. (2005) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2004.12.050 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Invariant indices of polarimetric purity
San José, I., & Gil, J. J. (2011) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2010.08.077 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Self-citationDegree of polarization and the principal idempotents of the coherency matrix
Barakat, R. (1977) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/0030-4018(77)90292-9 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Geometric interpretation of the three-dimensional coherence matrix for nonparaxial polarization
Dennis, M. R. (2004) · Journal of Optics A Pure and Applied Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4258/6/3/005 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Barakat, R. G. (1983) · Optica Acta International Journal of Optics · doi:10.1080/713821330 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Degree of polarization for three-dimensional fields as a distance between correlation matrices
Luis, A. (2005) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2005.04.046 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Optical Polarimetry of Random Fields
Ellis, J., & Dogariu, A. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.203905 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Interpretation of the coherency matrix for three-dimensional polarization states
Gil, J. J. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.043858 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationGil, J. J., & San José, I. (2010) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2010.04.090 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationA three-dimensional degree of polarization based on Rayleigh scattering
Dennis, M. R. (2007) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.24.002065 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Degree of polarization in 3D optical fields generated from a partially polarized plane wave
Setälä, T., Lindfors, K., & Friberg, A. T. (2009) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.34.003394 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationMeasures of quantum state purity and classical degree of polarization
Gamel, O., & James, D. F. V. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.033830 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Polarimetric subtraction of Mueller matrices
Gil, J. J., & José, I. S. (2013) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.30.001078 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationPartial polarization in three dimensions
Sheppard, C. J. R. (2011) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.28.002655 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Intrinsic Stokes parameters for 3D and 2D polarization states
Gil, J. J. (2015) · Journal of the European Optical Society Rapid Publications · doi:10.2971/jeos.2015.15054 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationComponents of purity of a three-dimensional polarization state
Gil, J. J. (2016) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.33.000040 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationOn the degree of polarization of random electromagnetic fields
Ellis, J., & Dogariu, A. C. (2005) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2005.05.020 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Geometric representation for partial polarization in three dimensions
Sheppard, C. J. R. (2012) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.37.002772 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Polarization distribution and degree of polarization for three-dimensional quantum light fields
Luis, A. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.063815 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Auñón, J. M., & Nieto‐Vesperinas, M. (2012) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.38.000058 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Majorization and measures of classical polarization in three dimensions
Gamel, O., & James, D. F. V. (2014) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.31.001620 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Geometric approach to the degree of polarization for arbitrary fields
Saastamoinen, T., & Tervo, J. (2004) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340408232512 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- C. Brosseau and A. Dogariu, Symmetry properties and polar- ization descriptors for an arbitrary electromagnetic wavefield, in Progress in Optics, edited by E. Wolf (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006), Vol. 49, Chap. 4.
- J. J. Gil, J. M. Correas, P. A. Melero, and C. Ferreira, Generalized polarization algebra, Monografías del Seminario Matemático García de Galdeano 31, 161 (2004), available from http://www.unizar.es/galdeano/ actas_pau/PDFVIII/pp161-167.pdf.
- W. A. Holm and R. M. Barnes, On radar polarization mixed target state decomposition techniques, in Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE USA Radar Conference (IEEE, New York, 1988), p. 249.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gil, J. J. (2007) · The European Physical Journal Applied Physics · doi:10.1051/epjap:2007153 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Self-citationPolarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization
Gil, J. J., Norrman, A., Friberg, A. T., & Setälä, T. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.023838 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Gil, J. J., Friberg, A. T., Setälä, T., & San José, I.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2017-05-24
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9926
- 2469-9934
- OpenAlex
- W2618126927
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8
- FWCI
- 2.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- zaguan.unizar.es
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- Zaguan (Universidad de Zaragoza) (submittedVersion)
- UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (FIS2014-58303-P)
- Suomen Akatemia (268480, 268705)
- Joensuun Yliopiston Tukisäätiö
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
- Keywords
- incoherent superposition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review