The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quarter-flux Hofstadter lattice in a qubit-compatible microwave cavity array
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One approach to realize noninteracting analog quantum Hall states in cavity- and circuit-QED systems relies upon engineering arrays of tunnel-coupled reentrant coaxial microwave cavities, and in this setup time-reversal symmetry is broken through the chiral onsite spatial wave function of every fourth resonator.
“One approach in this direction relies upon engineering arrays of tunnel-coupled reentrant coaxial microwave cavities, as outlined theoretically by Anderson et al. (2016) and demonstrated experimentally by Owens et al. (2018).In this setup, time-reversal symmetry is broken through the chiral onsite spatial wave function of every fourth resonator, as depicted in Fig. 12.”
From Topological photonics (2019) · cites this paper as Owens et al. (2018)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms
Greiner, M., Mandel, O., Esslinger, T., Hänsch, T. W., & Bloch, I. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415039a · Cited by 5,935
Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics
Wallraff, A., Schuster, D. I., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Huang, R. S., Majer, J., Kumar, S., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02851 · Cited by 3,796
Self-citationPhotonic Floquet topological insulators
Rechtsman, M. C., Zeuner, J. M., Plotnik, Y., Lumer, Y., Podolsky, D., Dreisow, F., Nolte, S., Segev, M., & Szameit, A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12066 · Cited by 3,332
Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states
Wang, Z., Chong, Y., Joannopoulos, J. D., & Soljačić, M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08293 · Cited by 3,123
Synthetic magnetic fields for ultracold neutral atoms
Lin, Y.-J., Compton, R. L., Jiménez-García, K., Porto, J. V., & Spielman, I. B. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08609 · Cited by 1,318
Synthetic Landau levels for photons
Schine, N., Ryou, A., Gromov, A., Sommer, A., & Simon, J. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17943 · Cited by 222
Self-citationInduced Self-Stabilization in Fractional Quantum Hall States of Light
Kapit, E., Hafezi, M., & Simon, S. H. (2014) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.4.031039 · Cited by 96
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.494 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.71.S298 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/38241 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aop.2007.10.008 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.205301 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.155303 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.155301 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms11994 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physleta.2013.06.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.885 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00018730802564122 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.175301 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature22811 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.185301 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature13915 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.201103 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2013.274 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.021031 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature11361 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphys3930 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041043 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.043811 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.014506 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.256804 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042319 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.174305 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.043811 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.023839 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4935541 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.240501 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ozawa, T., Price, H. M., Amo, A., Goldman, N., Hafezi, M., Lu, L., Rechtsman, M. C., Schuster, D., Simon, J., Zilberberg, O., et al. (2019) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.015006 · Cited by 3,722
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Owens, C., LaChapelle, A., Saxberg, B., Anderson, B. M., Ma, R., Simon, J., & Schuster, D. I.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2018-01-16
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2469-9926
- 2469-9934
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DMR-1420709)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-15-1-0397)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
