The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Merged-Element Transmons: Design and Qubit Performance
Open accessAbstract
We demonstrate a superconducting transmon qubit in which a Josephson junction has been engineered to act as its own parallel shunt capacitor. This merged-element transmon potentially offers a smaller footprint than conventional transmons. Because it concentrates the electromagnetic energy inside the junction, it reduces the relative electric field participation from other interfaces. By combining micrometer-scale $\mathrm{Al}$/$\mathrm{Al}\mathrm{O}$${}_{x}$/$\mathrm{Al}$ junctions with long oxidations, we produce functional devices with ${E}_{J}/{E}_{C}$ in the low-transmon regime (${E}_{J}/{E}_{C}\ensuremath{\lesssim}30$). Cryogenic $I$-$V$ measurements show a sharp $dI/dV$ structure with low subgap conduction. Qubit spectroscopy of tunable versions shows a small number of avoided level crossings, suggesting the presence of two-level systems. We observe mean ${T}_{1}$ times typically in the range of $10--90\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{s}$, with some annealed devices exhibiting ${T}_{1}>100\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{s}$ over several hours. The results suggest that energy relaxation in conventional small-junction transmons is not limited by junction loss.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The qubit frequency as a function of applied magnetic flux did not exhibit any observable avoided crossings with strongly coupled TLS (more than 250 kHz).
“The qubit frequency as a function of the applied magnetic flux did not exhibit any observable avoided crossings with the strongly coupled TLS (more than 250 kHz; Supplementary Information), reminiscent of a TLS inside the JJ barrier47,48.”
From Advanced CMOS manufacturing of superconducting qubits on 300 mm wafers (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
Citations
Cites
Fluctuations of Energy-Relaxation Times in Superconducting Qubits
Klimov, P. V., Kelly, J., Chen, Z., Neeley, M., Megrant, A., Burkett, B., Barends, R., Arya, K., Chiaro, B., Chen, Y., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.090502 · Cited by 328
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042319 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/2058-9565/abe519 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/JSTQE.2014.2358208 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.064006 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.100502 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3663539 · DOI
- 10.1109/TASC.2016.2629670 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.117901 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.210503 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-021-22030-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncomms7979 · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6668/ab8617 · DOI
- 10.1116/1.4722982 · DOI
- 10.1049/ip-smt:20010395 · DOI
- 10.1088/1674-1056/26/7/078501 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1389077 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.2437662 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3500823 · DOI
- 10.1116/1.3673790 · DOI
- M. Tinkham, 2004, Introduction to Superconductivity
- 10.1109/77.919518 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.180401 · DOI
- 10.1088/0953-2048/26/8/085010 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41534-019-0224-1 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4934486 · DOI
- 10.1109/TASC.2010.2097578 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4863686 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.120501 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advanced CMOS manufacturing of superconducting qubits on 300 mm wafers
Van Damme, J., Massar, S., Acharya, R., Ivanov, T., Perez Lozano, D., Canvel, Y., Demarets, M., Vangoidsenhoven, D., Hermans, Y., Lai, J. G., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07941-9 · Cited by 63
“The substrate–air, metal–air and substrate–metal interface participation ratios were calculated for the four different capacitor geometries (width and gap in {13, 24, 48, 90} μm).”
BackgroundMethodPath toward manufacturable superconducting qubits with relaxation times exceeding 0.1 ms
Verjauw, J., Acharya, R., Van Damme, J., Ivanov, T., Lozano, D. P., Mohiyaddin, F. A., Wan, D., Jussot, J., Vadiraj, A. M., Mongillo, M., et al. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00600-9 · Cited by 45
Improved coherence in optically defined niobium trilayer-junction qubits
Anferov, A., Lee, K.-H., Zhao, F., Simon, J., & Schuster, D. I. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.21.024047 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Mamin, H. J., Huang, E., Carnevale, S., Rettner, C. T., Arellano, N., Sherwood, M. H., Kurter, C., Trimm, B., Sandberg, M., Shelby, R. M., Mueed, M. A., Madon, B. A., Pushp, A., Steffen, M., & Rugar, D.
- Affiliations
- IBM Research - Almaden (US)
- IBM (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Physical Review Applied
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2021-08-13
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2331-7019 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3139246382
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 3.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Applied (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Superconducting and THz Device Technology
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- superconducting qubits, Al/AlOx/Al junctions, qubit coherence time, energy relaxation, avoided crossings, two-level system
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review