Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Covalent effects in the effective-medium theory of chemical binding: Hydrogen heats of solution in the3dmetals

Nørskov, J. K.·1982·Physical Review B

Abstract

The effective-medium-theory estimate of the binding energy of an atom to a host (another atom, molecule, or solid) from the host electron density, and the binding energy of the atom in a homogeneous electron gas has been extended to include covalent effects. The covalent term involves the difference in the one-electron energies between the atom in the host and the atom in homogeneous electron-gas systems. The scheme is tested for helium impurities in several transition metals and for hydrogen impurities in all the metals from potassium to copper. For helium all available binding energies are well reproduced and all the observed trends in the hydrogen heat of solution can be accounted for.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.26.2875

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Nørskov, J. K.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1982-09-15
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
2875-2885
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988681909
Cited by
462
References
15
FWCI
76.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.