Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 567

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Surface effects on the magnetic properties of ultrafine cobalt particles

Respaud, M., Broto, J. M., Rakoto, H., Fert, A. R., Thomas, L., Barbara, B., Verelst, M., Snoeck, E., Lecante, P., Mosset, A., Osuna, J., Ely, T. Ould, Amiens, C., Chaudret, B.·1998·Physical Review B

Abstract

Monodispersed nanoparticles of cobalt have been prepared by an original method using the decomposition under hydrogen of an organometallic precursor in the presence of a stabilizing polymer. Two colloids (Coll-I and Coll-II) have been obtained by changing the organometallic concentration in the polymer. Observation by high-resolution transmission electronic microscopy (HRTEM) showed Co particles well isolated and regularly dispersed in the polymer with a very narrow size distribution centered around 1.5 nm (Coll-I) and 2 nm (Coll-II) diameter. These particles are superparamagnetic above the blocking temperature 9 K (Coll-I) and 13.5 K (Coll-II). The particle size deduced from the analyses of the magnetic susceptibilities and magnetization curves are consistent with those measured by HRTEM. Magnetization at 5 K seems to saturate in fields up to 5 T leading to an enhanced mean magnetic moment per atom for both samples, where $〈{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{Co}}〉=1.94\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.05$ ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{B}$ for the smallest particles. High-field magnetization measurements, up to 35 T, increases nearly linearly with the applied field. This is equivalent to an increase of the mean magnetic moment with $〈{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathrm{Co}}〉=2.1\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.1$ ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{B}$ at 35 T for the smallest particles. The effective magnetic anisotropies are found to be larger than that of the bulk materials and decrease with increasing particle size. This set of data allows us to conclude that the enhanced magnetization, its increase with applied magnetic field, and the enhanced effective magnetic anisotropy are associated with the large influence of the surface atoms and are more significant with decreasing size.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.57.2925

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 567

Metadata

Authors
Respaud, M., Broto, J. M., Rakoto, H., Fert, A. R., Thomas, L., Barbara, B., Verelst, M., Snoeck, E., Lecante, P., Mosset, A., Osuna, J., Ely, T. O., Amiens, C., & Chaudret, B.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1998-02-01
Volume
57
Issue
5
Pages
2925-2935
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2019822642
Cited by
567
References
17
FWCI
23.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surface effects on the magnetic properties of ultrafine cobalt particles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.57.2925
The paper
Respaud, M., Broto, J. M., Rakoto, H., Fert, A. R., Thomas, L., Barbara, B., Verelst, M., Snoeck, E., Lecante, P., Mosset, A., Osuna, J., Ely, T. O., Amiens, C., & Chaudret, B. (1998). Surface effects on the magnetic properties of ultrafine cobalt particles. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.57.2925

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.