Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,083

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fine structure of neutral and charged excitons in self-assembled In(Ga)As/(Al)GaAs quantum dots

Bayer, M., Ortner, G., Stern, O., Kuther, A., Gorbunov, A. A., Forchel, A., Hawrylak, P., Fafard, S., Hinzer, K., Reinecke, T. L., Walck, S. N., Reithmaier, J. P., Klopf, F., Schäfer, F.·2002·Physical Review B

Abstract

The fine structure of excitons is studied by magnetophotoluminescence spectroscopy of single self-assembled In(Ga)As/(Al)GaAs quantum dots. Both strength and orientation of the magnetic field are varied. In a combination with a detailed theoretical analysis, these studies allow us to develop a comprehensive picture of the exciton fine structure. Symmetry of the dot structures as well as its breaking cause characteristic features in the optical spectra, which are determined by the electron-hole exchange and the Zeeman interaction of the carriers. The symmetry breaking is either inherent to the dot due to geometry asymmetries, or it can be obtained by applying a magnetic field with an orientation different from the dot symmetry axis. From data on spin splitting and on polarization of the emission we can identify neutral as well as charged exciton complexes. For dots with weakly broken symmetry, the angular momentum of the neutral exciton is no longer a good quantum number and the exchange interaction lifts degeneracies within the fine-structure manifold. The symmetry can be restored by a magnetic field due to the comparatively strong Zeeman interactions of electron and hole. For dots with a strongly broken symmetry, bright and dark excitons undergo a strong hybridization, as evidenced by pronounced anticrossings when states within the manifold are brought into resonance. The fine structure can no longer be described within the frame developed for structures of higher dimensionality. In particular, the hybridization cannot be broken magnetically. For charged excitons, the exchange interaction vanishes, demonstrating that the exchange splitting of a neutral exciton can be switched off by injecting an additional carrier.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.65.195315

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 1,083

Metadata

Authors
Bayer, M., Ortner, G., Stern, O., Kuther, A., Gorbunov, A. A., Forchel, A., Hawrylak, P., Fafard, S., Hinzer, K., Reinecke, T. L., Walck, S. N., Reithmaier, J. P., Klopf, F., & Schäfer, F.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2002-05-07
Volume
65
Issue
19
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2081279239
Cited by
1,083
References
53
FWCI
24.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fine structure of neutral and charged excitons in self-assembled In(Ga)As/(Al)GaAs quantum dots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.65.195315
The paper
Bayer, M., Ortner, G., Stern, O., Kuther, A., Gorbunov, A. A., Forchel, A., Hawrylak, P., Fafard, S., Hinzer, K., Reinecke, T. L., Walck, S. N., Reithmaier, J. P., Klopf, F., & Schäfer, F. (2002). Fine structure of neutral and charged excitons in self-assembled In(Ga)As/(Al)GaAs quantum dots. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.65.195315

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.