Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 534

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

First-principles calculations of the phase stability ofTiO2

Open access
Muscat, Joseph, Swamy, Varghese, Harrison, Nicholas M.·2002·Physical Review B

Abstract

First-principles calculations of the crystal structures, bulk moduli, and relative stabilities of seven known and hypothetical ${\mathrm{TiO}}_{2}$ polymorphs (anatase, rutile, columbite, baddeleyite, cotunnite, pyrite, and fluorite structures) have been carried out with the all-electron linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) and pseudopotential planewave (PW) methods. The anatase versus rutile relative phase stability at 0 K and zero pressure has been investigated using high-quality basis sets and carefully controlled computational parameters. From the optimal crystal structures obtained with the Hartree-Fock theory at various pressures, the bulk modulus and phase transition pressures of various high-pressure polymorphs have been derived at the athermal limit. In most cases, the calculated unit cell data agree to within 2% of the corresponding experimental determination. Complete predicted structural data (unit cell constants and fractional atomic coordinates) are presented for the baddeleyite and pyrite forms. The calculated bulk moduli are within 10% of the most reliable experimental results. Both the all-electron LCAO and pseudopotential PW methods predict anatase to be more stable than rutile at 0 K and ambient pressure. The computed anatase-columbite, rutile-columbite, columbite-baddeleyite, and baddeleyite-cotunnite phase transitions appear in the same order as observed in experiments, and the transition pressures agree semiquantitatively with those measured. The pyrite and fluorite structures are predicted to be less stable than other polymorphs at pressures below 70 GPa in agreement with experiments. Finally, the elastic properties, compressibilities and phase transformations of the various polymorphs are discussed in terms of simple models based on the behavior of the constituent Ti-O polyhedra under compression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.65.224112

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 534

Metadata

Authors
Muscat, J., Swamy, V., & Harrison, N. M.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2002-06-11
Volume
65
Issue
22
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2028455000
Cited by
534
References
4
FWCI
11.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First-principles calculations of the phase stability ofTiO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.65.224112
The paper
Muscat, J., Swamy, V., & Harrison, N. M. (2002). First-principles calculations of the phase stability ofTiO2. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.65.224112

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.