The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finite-size and pressure effects on the Raman spectrum of nanocrystalline anataseTiO2
Abstract
The Raman scattering behavior of anatase nanocrystals with average diameters of 4, 8, 20, and 34 nm has been compared with bulk crystal data in order to establish size-dependent changes to the phonon spectrum at ambient conditions. Further, the high-pressure behavior of the anatase nanocrystals was examined at room-temperature using in situ Raman scattering data obtained in diamond-anvil cells to a maximum pressure of 41 GPa. The size-dependent changes to the Raman spectrum are best explained in terms of three-dimensional confinement of phonons in finite-sized nanocrystalline anatase. The difference in slopes obtained for the pressure shifts of Raman modes between nanocrystalline and single crystal anatase is in conformity with the observed size-dependent bulk modulus values. The metastability of anatase as a function of pressure is demonstrated to be size dependent, with smaller crystallites preserving the structure to higher pressures. Three size regimes have been recognized for the pressure-induced phase transition of anatase at room temperature: an anatase-amorphous transition regime at the smallest crystallite sizes, an anatase-baddeleyite transition regime at intermediate crystallite sizes, and an anatase--$\ensuremath{\alpha}\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{Pb}{\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ transition regime comprising large nanocrystals to macroscopic single crystals. This size-dependent phase selectivity of anatase at high pressures explains the recent contradictory experimental data. A semiquantitative phase diagram for anatase metastability as a function of size and pressure at room temperature is proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures.
Savitzky, A., & Golay, M. J. E. (1964) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60214a047 · Cited by 21,904
Photocatalysis on TiO2 Surfaces: Principles, Mechanisms, and Selected Results
Linsebigler, A. L., Lu, G., & Yates, J. T. (1995) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00035a013 · Cited by 11,575
Raman spectrum of anatase, TiO 2
Ohsaka, T., Izumi, F., & Fujiki, Y. (1978) · Journal of Raman Spectroscopy · doi:10.1002/jrs.1250070606 · Cited by 2,327
Cited by
Kapilashrami, M., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y.-S., Hagfeldt, A., & Guo, J. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5000893 · Cited by 508
Pastrana-Martínez, L. M., Morales-Torres, S., Likodimos, V., Figueiredo, J. L., Faria, J. L., Falaras, P., & Silva, A. M. T. (2012) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.04.045 · Cited by 323
Laser processing of TiO2 colloids for an enhanced photocatalytic water splitting activity
Filice, S., Compagnini, G., Fiorenza, R., Scirè, S., D’Urso, L., Fragalà, M. E., Russo, P., Fazio, E., & Scalese, S. (2017) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2016.08.013 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Swamy, V., Kuznetsov, A., Dubrovinsky, L. S., Caruso, R. A., Shchukin, D. G., & Muddle, B. C.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-05-10
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 18
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W2066309273
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Finite-size and pressure effects on the Raman spectrum of nanocrystalline anataseTiO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.71.184302
- The paper
- Swamy, V., Kuznetsov, A., Dubrovinsky, L. S., Caruso, R. A., Shchukin, D. G., & Muddle, B. C. (2005). Finite-size and pressure effects on the Raman spectrum of nanocrystalline anataseTiO2. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.71.184302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.