Cited by 134Thermal properties of materialsGraphene research and applications2D Materials and Applications

Reliability of Raman measurements of thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene due to selective electron-phonon coupling: A first-principles study

Vallabhaneni, Ajit K., Singh, Dhruv, Bao, Hua, Murthy, Jayathi, Ruan, Xiulin·2016·Physical Review B

Abstract

Raman spectroscopy has been widely used to measure thermal conductivity ($\ensuremath{\kappa}$) of two-dimensional (2D) materials such as graphene. This method is based on a well-accepted assumption that different phonon polarizations are in near thermal equilibrium. However, in this paper, we show that, in laser-irradiated single-layer graphene, different phonon polarizations are in strong nonequilibrium, using predictive simulations based on first principles density functional perturbation theory and a multitemperature model. We first calculate the electron cooling rate due to phonon scattering as a function of the electron and phonon temperatures, and the results clearly illustrate that optical phonons dominate the hot electron relaxation process. We then use these results in conjunction with the phonon scattering rates computed using perturbation theory to develop a multitemperature model and resolve the spatial temperature distributions of the energy carriers in graphene under steady-state laser irradiation. Our results show that electrons, optical phonons, and acoustic phonons are in strong nonequilibrium, with the flexural acoustic (ZA) phonons showing the largest nonequilibrium to other phonon modes, mainly due to their weak coupling to other carriers in suspended graphene. Since ZA phonons are the main heat carriers in graphene, we estimate that neglecting this nonequilibrium leads to underestimation of thermal conductivity in experiments at room temperature by a factor of 1.35 to 2.6, depending on experimental conditions and assumptions used. Underestimation is also expected in Raman measurements of other 2D materials when the optical-acoustic phonon coupling is weak.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.93.125432

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vallabhaneni, A. K., Singh, D., Bao, H., Murthy, J., & Ruan, X.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Intel (United States) (US)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ruan, Xiulin
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2016-03-28
Volume
93
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9969
OpenAlex
W2324689618
Cited by
134
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical review. B./Physical review. B (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Purdue University
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-11-1-0057)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51306111)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (13ZR1456000)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › 2D Materials and Applications
Keywords
monolayer graphene, thermal conductivity, Raman thermometry, electron-phonon coupling, nonequilibrium phonons, electron cooling, optical phonons, laser irradiation, suspended graphene, density functional perturbation theory, two-dimensional materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review