Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stripe order in superconducting La2−xBaxCuO4(0.095⩽x⩽0.155)

Open access
Hücker, M., v. Zimmermann, M., Gu, G. D., Xu, Z. J., Wen, J. S., Xu, Guangyong, Kang, H. J., Zheludev, A., Tranquada, J. M.·2011·Physical Review B

Abstract

The correlations between stripe order, superconductivity, and crystal structure in ${\mathrm{La}}_{2\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Ba}}_{x}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$ single crystals have been studied by means of x-ray and neutron diffraction as well as static magnetization measurements. The derived phase diagram shows that charge stripe order (CO) coexists with bulk superconductivity in a broad range of doping around $x=1/8$, although the CO order parameter and correlation length fall off quickly for $x\ensuremath{\ne}1/8$. Except for $x=0.155$, the onset of CO always coincides with the transition between the orthorhombic and the tetragonal or less orthorhombic low-temperature structures. The CO transition evolves from a sharp drop at low $x$ to a more gradual transition at higher $x$, eventually falling below the structural phase boundary for optimum doping. With respect to the interlayer CO correlations, we find no qualitative change of the stripe stacking order as a function of doping, and in-plane and out-of-plane correlations disappear simultaneously at the transition. Similarly to the CO, the spin stripe order (SO) is also most pronounced at $x=1/8$. Truly static SO sets in below the CO and coincides with the first appearance of in-plane superconducting correlations at temperatures significantly above the bulk transition to superconductivity (SC). Indications that bulk SC causes a reduction of the spin or charge stripe order could not be identified. We argue that CO is the dominant order that is compatible with SC pairing but competes with SC phase coherence. Comparing our results with data from the literature, we find good agreement if all results are plotted as a function of ${x}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ instead of the nominal $x$, where ${x}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ represents an estimate of the actual Ba content, extracted from the doping dependence of the structural transition between the orthorhombic phase and the tetragonal high-temperature phase.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.83.104506

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Hücker, M., v. Zimmermann, M., Gu, G. D., Xu, Z. J., Wen, J. S., Xu, G., Kang, H. J., Zheludev, A., & Tranquada, J. M.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2011-03-17
Volume
83
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W1640861269
Cited by
284
References
57
FWCI
17.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stripe order in superconducting La2−xBaxCuO4(0.095⩽x⩽0.155). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.83.104506
The paper
Hücker, M., v. Zimmermann, M., Gu, G. D., Xu, Z. J., Wen, J. S., Xu, G., Kang, H. J., Zheludev, A., & Tranquada, J. M. (2011). Stripe order in superconducting La2−xBaxCuO4(0.095⩽x⩽0.155). Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.83.104506

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.