Cited by 298Physics of Superconductivity and MagnetismQuantum many-body systemsTheoretical and Computational Physics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Absence of Superconductivity in the Pure Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model

Open access
Qin, Mingpu, Chung, Chia-Min, Shi, Hao, Vitali, Ettore, Hubig, Claudius, Schollwöck, Ulrich, White, Steven R., Zhang, Shiwei, Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem·2020·Physical Review X

Abstract

We study the superconducting pairing correlations in the ground state of the doped Hubbard model-in its original form without hopping beyond nearest neighbor or other perturbing parameters-in two dimensions at intermediate to strong coupling and near optimal doping.The nature of such correlations has been a central question ever since the discovery of cuprate high-temperature superconductors.Despite unprecedented effort and tremendous progress in understanding the properties of this fundamental model, a definitive answer to whether the ground state is superconducting in the parameter regime most relevant to cuprates has proved exceedingly difficult to establish.In this work, we employ two complementary, state-of-the-art, many-body computational methods-constrained-path (CP) auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC) and density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) methods-deploying the most recent algorithmic advances in each.Systematic and detailed comparisons between the two methods are performed.The DMRG is extremely reliable on small width cylinders, where we use it to validate the AFQMC.The AFQMC is then used to study wide systems as well as fully periodic systems, to establish that we have reached the thermodynamic limit.The ground state is found to be nonsuperconducting in the moderate to strong coupling regime in the vicinity of optimal hole doping.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevx.10.031016

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Superconductivity is absent in the pure Hubbard model (no next-nearest-neighbor hopping).

    “Previously, we used this combination was used, by extrapolating to the two-dimensional thermodynamic limit, to find that superconductivity is absent in the pure (i.e., with no next nearest-neighbor hopping) Hubbard model ( 11 ).”

    From Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model (2024) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Approach section describes a pure Hubbard model with nearest-neighbor hopping only, and the Summary says this model was found not to exhibit superconductivity. But the Introduction explicitly limits that conclusion to the physically relevant parameter regime and says the paper does not rule out superconductivity anywhere in the pure model. The claim omits that qualification. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous calculations show that states with IPS are favored, which was taken as an indication of local pairing of electrons in the stripe state.

    “Previous calculations ( 11, 52 ) show that states with IPS are favored, which was taken as an indication of the existence of local pairing of electrons in the stripe state.”

    From Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model (2024) · cites this paper as [11]

    Section C, “Competition between pairing and stripes,” describes even hole numbers in partially filled stripes as evidence of local pairing; Appendix C likewise says short-range pairing exists in the stripes. Our copy does not identify IPS states or report that they are energetically favored, so that part of the attributed claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ground states of the models are exceptionally sensitive to small changes in the model terms and parameters, with competing or cooperating charge, spin, and superconducting orders.

    “the ground states of the models have been shown to be exceptionally sensitive to small changes in the model terms and parameters, with competing ( 11 ) or cooperating ( 12 ) charge, spin ( 13 ), and superconducting (SC) orders ( 14-18 ).”
  • For t'=0, the stripes were filled, and superconductivity was absent.

    “in contrast, for t ′ = 0 the stripes were filled, and superconductivity was absent ( 11 ).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 90

  1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.66.763 · DOI
  2. 10.1098/rspa.1963.0204 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.235.4793.1196 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.3759 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.4403 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.085140 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.085103 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1383 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/31177 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.457 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.075112 · DOI
  12. 10.1143/JPSJ.57.2482 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.931 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.12318 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.R9283 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.117002 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.237001 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.156404 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.054513 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.235117 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.165122 · DOI
  22. 10.1143/JPSJ.76.113708 · DOI
  23. 10.1143/JPSJ.75.114706 · DOI
  24. 10.1143/JPSJ.73.545 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.180504 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.085104 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.081110 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.241106 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.216405 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.116402 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.115137 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.035126 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.205132 · DOI
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4486 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1706 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1294 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0921-4534(89)90316-X · DOI
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.7391 · DOI
  39. 10.1143/JPSJ.59.1047 · DOI
  40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.9749 · DOI
  41. 10.1051/jphys:0198900500180283300 · DOI
  42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1272 · DOI
  43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.R753 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.117001 · DOI
  45. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.136403 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.075108 · DOI
  47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.140505 · DOI
  48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.134530 · DOI
  49. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.116402 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.041108 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.046402 · DOI
  52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.085103 · DOI
  53. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.125125 · DOI
  54. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.195141 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/0022-3697(95)00269-3 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.175301 · DOI
  57. 10.1126/science.aat4134 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/nature22362 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/s41586-019-1463-1 · DOI
  60. 10.1126/science.aam7127 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1088/1367-2630/15/9/093005 · DOI
  62. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.174529 · DOI
  63. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.104506 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/S0022-3697(02)00072-0 · DOI
  65. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.7464 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.235119 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.11163 · DOI
  68. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.1097 · DOI
  69. 10.1209/epl/i2001-00557-x · DOI
  70. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.224505 · DOI
  71. 10.1209/0295-5075/110/57001 · DOI
  72. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.127004 · DOI
  73. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.9301 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.165101 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.045144 · DOI
  76. 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.023621 · DOI
  77. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.10345 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125018 · DOI · Paper page
  80. C. Hubig, 2017, Symmetry-Protected Tensor Networks
  81. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.155115 · DOI
  82. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.045125 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.220504 · DOI
  84. 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.839 · DOI
  85. 10.1023/A:1022559920049 · DOI
  86. 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.041041 · DOI
  87. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.155116 · DOI
  88. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.195139 · DOI
  89. 10.1038/375561a0 · DOI · Paper page
  90. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2017.12.026 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Qin, M., Chung, C.-M., Shi, H., Vitali, E., Hubig, C., Schollwöck, U., White, S. R., Zhang, S., & Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem
Affiliations
  • William & Mary (US)
  • Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology (DE)
  • Flatiron Institute (US)
  • Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics (DE)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Physical Review X
Published
2020-07-21
Volume
10
Issue
3
ISSN
2160-3308 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3044148120
Cited by
298
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 13
FWCI
38.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review X (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation
  • National Science Foundation (DMR-1812558, ACI-1053575)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • College of William and Mary
  • H2020 European Research Council (742102)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
Keywords
two-dimensional Hubbard model, superconductivity, cuprate superconductors, ground state, strong coupling, density matrix renormalization group, thermodynamic limit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review