Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bipartite fluctuations as a probe of many-body entanglement

Open access
Song, H. Francis, Rachel, Stephan, Flindt, Christian, Klich, Israel, Laflorencie, Nicolas, Le Hur, Karyn·2012·Physical Review B

Abstract

We investigate in detail the behavior of the bipartite fluctuations of particle number $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{N}$ and spin ${\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{S}}^{z}$ in many-body quantum systems, focusing on systems where such U(1) charges are both conserved and fluctuate within subsystems due to exchange of charges between subsystems. We propose that the bipartite fluctuations are an effective tool for studying many-body physics, particularly its entanglement properties, in the same way that noise and full counting statistics have been used in mesoscopic transport and cold-atomic gases. For systems that can be mapped to a problem of noninteracting fermions, we show that the fluctuations and higher-order cumulants fully encode the information needed to determine the entanglement entropy as well as the full entanglement spectrum through the R\'enyi entropies. In this connection, we derive a simple formula that explicitly relates the eigenvalues of the reduced density matrix to the R\'enyi entropies of integer order for any finite density matrix. In other systems, particularly in one dimension, the fluctuations are in many ways similar but not equivalent to the entanglement entropy. Fluctuations are tractable analytically, computable numerically in both density matrix renormalization-group and quantum Monte Carlo calculations, and in principle accessible in condensed-matter and cold-atom experiments. In the context of quantum point contacts, measurement of the second charge cumulant showing a logarithmic dependence on time would constitute a strong indication of many-body entanglement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.85.035409

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
Song, H. F., Rachel, S., Flindt, C., Klich, I., Laflorencie, N., & Le Hur, K.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2012-01-06
Volume
85
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2063192576
Cited by
297
References
8
FWCI
11.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.