Cited by 796Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum many-body systemsStrong Light-Matter Interactions

Probing the Superfluid–to–Mott Insulator Transition at the Single-Atom Level

Open access
Bakr, W. S., Peng, A., Tai, M. E., Ma, R., Simon, J., Gillen, J. I., Fölling, S., Pollet, L. +1 more·2010·Science

Abstract

From Superfluid to Mott Insulator: One of the most attractive characteristics of cold atomic gases in optical lattices is their ability to simulate condensed-matter systems. The results of these quantum simulations are usually averaged over the atomic ensemble, or course-grained over several lattice sites. Now, Bakr et al. (p. 547 , published online 17 June; see the Perspective by DeMarco ) provide a single lattice site view onto the transition of a Bose gas of Rb-87 from the superfluid to the Mott-insulating state. Characteristic concentric shells of uniform number density were observed deep in the Mott insulator regime, and probing the local quantum dynamics revealed unexpectedly short time scales. The low-defect Mott structures identified may provide a starting point for quantum magnetism experiments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1192368

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In one case, numerical simulations helped to correct the expected experimental temperature by up to 30%.

    “amazingly, in one case numerical simulations helped to correct the expected experimental temperature by up to 30% .”

    From Can one trust quantum simulators? (2012) · cites this paper as [6]

  • Validation of quantum simulator results against analytical and numerical predictions in the regime where comparison is possible was recently demonstrated in experiments with ultracold bosonic and fermionic atoms.

    “This was recently demonstrated in experiments with ultracold bosonic and fermionic atoms [6-8];”

    From Can one trust quantum simulators? (2012) · cites this paper as [6]

  • The most advanced experiments with AQSs have been with ultracold atoms in optical lattices.

    “The most advanced experiments with AQSs have been with ultracold atoms in optical lattices [3, 5-15, 19, 71].”

    From Can one trust quantum simulators? (2012) · cites this paper as [6]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [22]S. Trotzky, L. Pollet, F. Gerbier, U. Schnorrberger, I. Bloch, N. V. Prokof'ev, B. Svistunov, and M. Troyer, Preprint at < http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.4882 > (2009). · arXiv
  2. [33]E. Kapit and E. Mueller, Preprint at < http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.4903 > (2010). http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.4903 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bakr, W. S., Peng, A., Tai, M. E., Ma, R., Simon, J., Gillen, J. I., Fölling, S., Pollet, L., & Greiner, M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Greiner, M.
Venue
Science
Published
2010-07-30
Volume
329
Issue
5991
Pages
547-550
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2143757924
Cited by
796
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 82
FWCI
44.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
Keywords
superfluid-Mott insulator transition, Bose-Hubbard model, optical lattices, single-atom imaging, quantum phase transitions, quantum gases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review