Cited by 243Topological Materials and Phenomena2D Materials and ApplicationsAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics

Large linear magnetoresistance in Dirac semimetalCd3As2with Fermi surfaces close to the Dirac points

Open access
Feng, Junya, Pang, Yuan, Wu, Desheng, Wang, Zhijun, Weng, Hongming, Li, Jianqi, Dai, Xi, Fang, Zhong +2 more·2015·Physical Review B

Abstract

We investigated the magnetoresistive behavior of an ideal Dirac semimetal---high-quality single crystals of ${\mathrm{Cd}}_{3}{\mathrm{As}}_{2}$ with a Fermi level very close to the Dirac point. A large linear magnetoresistance (LMR), up to 3100% in a magnetic field of 14 T, was observed at a temperature of $T=2\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$. The detailed field and temperature dependencies reveal that the LMR occurs only when the Zeeman energy surpasses the thermal energy. Our result hints that the field-induced relative shifting of the two Weyl-Fermi surfaces in each Dirac cone in momentum space is likely responsible for the LMR behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.92.081306

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar behavior has been seen in DSMs like Bi0.97Sb0.03, Na3Bi, Cd3As2, and ZrTe5, and the quadratic band touching system.

    “Similar behavior has been seen in DSMs like Bi 0 . 97 Sb 0 . 03 (Kim et al. , 2013), Na 3 Bi (Xiong et al. , 2015), Cd 3 As 2 (Feng et al. , 2015; Li et al. , 2015, 2016b; Liang et al. , 2015; Zhang et al. , 2017a), and ZrTe 5 (Li et al. , 2016c), and the quadratic band touching system (Hirschberger et al. , 2016a).”

    From Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids (2018) · cites this paper as Feng et al. , 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feng, J., Pang, Y., Wu, D., Wang, Z., Weng, H., Li, J., Dai, X., Fang, Z., Shi, Y., & Lu, L.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2015-08-19
Volume
92
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W1603445571
Cited by
243
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 1
FWCI
15.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2009CB929101, 2011CB921702, 2011CBA00110)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (91221203, 11174340, 11174357, 11274367)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › 2D Materials and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
Keywords
linear magnetoresistance, Cd3As2, Dirac semimetal, Fermi surface, Dirac point, Zeeman energy, Dirac cones, high magnetic fields, single crystals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review