The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum Monte Carlo calculations ofA=8nuclei
Open accessAbstract
We report quantum Monte Carlo calculations of ground and low-lying excited states for $A=8$ nuclei using a realistic Hamiltonian containing the Argonne ${v}_{18}$ two-nucleon and Urbana IX three-nucleon potentials. The calculations begin with correlated eight-body wave functions that have a filled $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-like core and four p-shell nucleons $\mathrm{LS}$ coupled to the appropriate ${(J}^{\ensuremath{\pi}};T)$ quantum numbers for the state of interest. After optimization, these variational wave functions are used as input to a Green's function Monte Carlo calculation made with a new constrained path algorithm. We find that the Hamiltonian produces a ${}^{8}\mathrm{Be}$ ground state that is within 2 MeV of the experimental resonance, but the other eight-body energies are progressively worse as the neutron-proton asymmetry increases. The ${}^{8}\mathrm{Li}$ ground state is stable against breakup into subclusters, but the ${}^{8}\mathrm{He}$ ground state is not. The excited state spectra are in fair agreement with experiment, with both the single-particle behavior of ${}^{8}\mathrm{He}$ and ${}^{8}\mathrm{Li}$ and the collective rotational behavior of ${}^{8}\mathrm{Be}$ being reproduced. We also examine energy differences in the $T=1,2$ isomultiplets and isospin-mixing matrix elements in the excited states of ${}^{8}\mathrm{Be}.$ Finally, we present densities, momentum distributions, and studies of the intrinsic shapes of these nuclei, with ${}^{8}\mathrm{Be}$ exhibiting a definite $2\ensuremath{\alpha}$ cluster structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Constrained path Monte Carlo method for fermion ground states
Zhang, S., Carlson, J., & Gubernatis, J. E. (1997) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.55.7464 · Cited by 388
Self-citation
Cited by
The shell model as a unified view of nuclear structure
Caurier, E., Martínez-Pinedo, G., Nowacki, F., Poves, A., & Zuker, A. P. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.427 · Cited by 1,300
Quantum Monte Carlo methods for nuclear physics
Carlson, J., Gandolfi, S., Pederiva, F., Pieper, S. C., Schiavilla, R., Schmidt, K. E., & Wiringa, R. B. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.1067 · Cited by 818
Self-citationRecent trends in the determination of nuclear masses
Lunney, D., Pearson, J. M., & Thibault, C. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.1021 · Cited by 759
Self-consistent Green's function method for nuclei and nuclear matter
Dickhoff, W. H., & Barbieri, C. (2004) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2004.02.038 · Cited by 503
Recent developments in no-core shell-model calculations
Navrátil, P., Quaglioni, S., Stetcu, I., & Barrett, B. R. (2009) · Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/36/8/083101 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiringa, R. B., Pieper, S. C., Carlson, J., & Pandharipande, V. R.
- Venue
- Physical Review C
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0556-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-490X
- OpenAlex
- W2135700676
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum Monte Carlo calculations ofA=8nuclei. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevc.62.014001
- The paper
- Wiringa, R. B., Pieper, S. C., Carlson, J., & Pandharipande, V. R. (2000). Quantum Monte Carlo calculations ofA=8nuclei. Physical Review C. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.62.014001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.