The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Saturation with chiral interactions and consequences for finite nuclei
Open accessAbstract
We explore the impact of nuclear matter saturation on the properties and systematics of finite nuclei across the nuclear chart. By using the ab initio in-medium similarity renormalization group (IM-SRG), we study ground-state energies and charge radii of closed-shell nuclei from $^{4}\mathrm{He}$ to $^{78}\mathrm{Ni}$ based on a set of low-resolution two- and three-nucleon interactions that predict realistic saturation properties. We first investigate in detail the convergence properties of these Hamiltonians with respect to model-space truncations for both two- and three-body interactions. We find one particular interaction that reproduces well the ground-state energies of all closed-shell nuclei studied. As expected from their saturation points relative to this interaction, the other Hamiltonians underbind nuclei but lead to a remarkably similar systematics of ground-state energies. Extending our calculations to complete isotopic chains in the $sd$ and $pf$ shells with the valence-space IM-SRG, the same interaction reproduces not only experimental ground states but two-neutron-separation energies and first-excited ${2}^{+}$ states. We also extend the valence-space IM-SRG to calculate radii. Since this particular interaction saturates at too high density, charge radii are still too small compared with experiment. Except for this underprediction, the radius systematics is, however, well reproduced. Our results highlight the renewed importance of nuclear matter as a theoretical benchmark for the development of next-generation chiral interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modern theory of nuclear forces
Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W., & Meißner, U.-G. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1773 · Cited by 1,883
Cited by
High-quality two-nucleon potentials up to fifth order of the chiral expansion
Entem, D. R., Machleidt, R., & Nosyk, Y. (2017) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.024004 · Cited by 355
Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principles
Gysbers, P., Hagen, G., Holt, J. D., Jansen, G. R., Morris, T. D., Navrátil, P., Papenbrock, T., Quaglioni, S., Schwenk, A., Stroberg, S. R., et al. (2019) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0450-7 · Cited by 348
Self-citationA Guided Tour of ab initio Nuclear Many-Body Theory
Hergert, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00379 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Simonis, J., Stroberg, S. R., Hebeler, K., Holt, J. D., & Schwenk, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review C
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2017-07-05
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0556-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9985
- 2469-9993
- OpenAlex
- W2605671888
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Saturation with chiral interactions and consequences for finite nuclei. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevc.96.014303
- The paper
- Simonis, J., Stroberg, S. R., Hebeler, K., Holt, J. D., & Schwenk, A. (2017). Saturation with chiral interactions and consequences for finite nuclei. Physical Review C. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.96.014303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.