Cited by 574Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Fluctuations at the Threshold of Classical Cosmology

Harrison, E. R.·1970·Physical Review D

Abstract

The "threshold epoch" of classical cosmology is first discussed from a classical point of view. It is shown that if the density fluctuations at this epoch are proportional to ${N}^{\ensuremath{-}n}$ (where $N$ is the number of particles in a disturbance), then $n$ must exactly, or very closely, equal the value $\frac{2}{3}$ in order that such fluctuations develop into protogalaxies. This result is independent of the value of the threshold epoch, and of the equation of state for the very early universe. Arguments of a speculative nature are then presented which indicate that the threshold epoch occurs at the Planck density. It is also proposed that the initial conditions of galaxy formation are metric fluctuations at the threshold epoch of classical cosmology. The evidence in favor of this theory is (i) the density fluctuation obeys the $n=\frac{2}{3}$ rule, and (ii) the spin fluctuation gives an eventual angular momentum of the order ${N}^{\frac{4}{3}}\ensuremath{\hbar}$, in reasonable agrement with that of the Galaxy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.1.2726

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The primordial fluctuations would be scale invariant and described by a power spectrum.

    “These primordial fluctuations would be scale invariant and described by the power spectrum (Harrison 1970; Peebles and Yu 1970; Zeldovich 1972)48with .”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Harrison 1970

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, E. R.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Harrison, E. R.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1970-05-15
Volume
1
Issue
10
Pages
2726-2730
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991824329
Cited by
574
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • EP Europace
Funders
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
classical cosmology, density fluctuations, protogalaxy formation, Planck density, metric fluctuations, spin fluctuations, early universe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review