Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 596

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rare decay modes of theKmesons in gauge theories

Gaillard, M. K., Lee, Benjamin W.·1974·Physical Review D

Abstract

Rare decay modes of the kaons such as $K\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\mu}\overline{\ensuremath{\mu}}$, $K\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}$, $K\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}$, $K\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}$, and $K\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\pi}e\overline{e}$ are of theoretical interest since here we are observing higher-order weak and electromagnetic interactions. Recent advances in unified gauge theories of weak and electromagnetic interactions allow in principle unambiguous and finite predictions for these processes. The above processes, which are "induced" $|\ensuremath{\Delta}S|=1$ transitions, are a good testing ground for the cancellation mechanism first invented by Glashow, Iliopoulos, and Maiani (GIM) in order to banish $|\ensuremath{\Delta}S|=1$ neutral currents. The experimental suppression of ${K}_{L}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\mu}\overline{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ and nonsuppression of ${K}_{L}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}$ must find a natural explanation in the GIM mechanism which makes use of extra quark(s). The procedure we follow is the following: We deduce the effective interaction Lagrangian for $\ensuremath{\lambda}+\mathfrak{N}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}l+\overline{l}$ and $\ensuremath{\lambda}+\overline{\mathfrak{N}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}+\ensuremath{\gamma}$ in the free-quark model; then the appropriate matrix elements of these operators between hadronic states are evaluated with the aid of the principles of conserved vector current and partially conserved axial-vector current. We focus our attention on the Weinberg-Salam model. In this model, $K\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\mu}\overline{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ is suppressed due to a fortuitous cancellation. To explain the small ${K}_{L}\ensuremath{-}{K}_{S}$ mass difference and nonsuppression of ${K}_{L}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}$, it is found necessary to assume $\frac{{m}_{\mathcal{P}}}{{m}_{{\mathcal{P}}^{\ensuremath{'}}}}<<1$, where ${m}_{\mathcal{P}}$ is the mass of the proton quark and ${m}_{{\mathcal{P}}^{\ensuremath{'}}}$, the mass of the charmed quark, and ${m}_{{\mathcal{P}}^{\ensuremath{'}}}<5$ GeV. We present a phenomenological argument which indicates that the average mass of charmed pseudoscalar states lies below 10 GeV. The effective interactions so constructed are then used to estimate the rates of other processes. Some of the results are the following: ${K}_{S}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}$ is suppressed; ${K}_{S}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}$ proceeds at a normal rate, but ${K}_{L}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}$ is suppressed; ${K}_{L}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}$ is very much forbidden, and ${K}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}$ occurs with the branching ratio of ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\sim}}10}^{\ensuremath{-}10}$; ${K}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}e\overline{e}$ has the branching ratio of ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\sim}}10}^{\ensuremath{-}6}$, which is comparable to the presently available experimental upper bound. The predictions of other models are briefly discussed. Relevant renormalization procedures and computational details are discussed in appendixes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.10.897

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 596

Metadata

Authors
Gaillard, M. K., & Lee, B. W.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1974-08-01
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
897-916
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128114549
Cited by
596
References
1
FWCI
17.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.