Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 557

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Particle emission rates from a black hole. II. Massless particles from a rotating hole

Page, Don N.·1976·Physical Review D

Abstract

The calculations of the first paper of this series (for nonrotating black holes) are extended to the emission rates of massless or nearly massless particles from a rotating hole and the consequent evolution of the hole. The power emitted increases as a function of the angular momentum of the hole, for a given mass, by factors of up to 13.35 for neutrinos, 107.5 for photons, and 26 380 for gravitons. Angular momentum is emitted several times faster than energy, so a rapidly rotating black hole spins down to a nearly nonrotating state before most of its mass has been given up. The third law of black-hole mechanics is proved for small perturbations of an uncharged hole, showing that it is impossible to spin up a hole to the extreme Kerr configuration. If a hole is rotating fast enough, its area and entropy initially increase with time (at an infinite rate for the extreme Kerr configuration) as heat flows into the hole from particle pairs created in the ergosphere. As the rotation decreases, the thermal emission becomes dominant, drawing heat out of the hole and decreasing its area. The lifetime of a black hole of a given mass varies with the initial rotation by a factor of only 2.0 to 2.7 (depending upon which particle species are emitted). If a nonrotating primordial black hole with initial mass 5 \ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{} ${10}^{14}$ g would have just decayed away within the present age of the universe, a hole created maximally rotating would have just died if its initial mass were about 7 \ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{} ${10}^{14}$ g. Primordial black holes created with larger masses would still exist today, but they would have a maximum rotation rate determined uniquely by the present mass. If they are small enough today to be emitting many hadrons, they are predicted to be very nearly nonrotating.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.14.3260

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. R. M. Wald, 1976, Phys. Rev. D, 13, 3176, 10.1103/PhysRevD.13.3176 · DOI
  2. L. Parker, 1975, Phys. Rev. D, 12, 1519, 10.1103/PhysRevD.12.1519 · DOI
  3. B. S. DeWitt, 1975, Phys. Rep., 19C, 295, 10.1016/0370-1573(75)90051-4 · DOI · Paper page
  4. J. B. Hartle, 1976, Phys. Rev. D, 13, 2188, 10.1103/PhysRevD.13.2188 · DOI · Paper page
  5. D. N. Page, 1976, Phys. Rev. D, 13, 198, 10.1103/PhysRevD.13.198 · DOI · Paper page
  6. D. N. Page, 1976, Astrophys. J., 206, 1, 10.1086/154350 · DOI · Paper page
  7. B. Carter, Astron. Astrophys.
  8. W. T. Zaumen, 1974, Nature, 247, 530, 10.1038/247530a0 · DOI
  9. G. W. Gibbons, 1975, Commun. Math. Phys., 44, 245, 10.1007/BF01609829 · DOI · Paper page
  10. B. Carter, 1974, Phys. Rev. Lett., 33, 558, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.558 · DOI
  11. S. W. Hawking, 1976, Phys. Rev. D, 13, 191, 10.1103/PhysRevD.13.191 · DOI · Paper page
  12. S. A. Teukolsky, 1972, Phys. Rev. Lett., 29, 1114, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.29.1114 · DOI · Paper page
  13. S. A. Teukolsky, 1973, Astrophys. J., 185, 635, 10.1086/152444 · DOI · Paper page
  14. I. J. Schoenberg, 1946, Quart. Appl. Math., 4, 45, 10.1090/qam/15914 · doi:10.1090/qam/15914
  15. I. J. Schoenberg, 1946, Quart. Appl. Math., 4, 112, 10.1090/qam/16705 · doi:10.1090/qam/16705
  16. S. A. Teukolsky, 1974, Astrophys. J., 193, 443, 10.1086/153180 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Ya. B. Zel'dovich, 1971, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. Pis'ma Red., 14, 270
  18. Ya. B. Zel'dovich, 1972, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 62, 2076
  19. C. W. Misner, 1972, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., 17, 472
  20. A. A. Starobinsky, 1973, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 64, 48
  21. A. A. Starobinsky, 1973, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 65, 3
  22. R. Penrose, 1969, Riv. Nuovo Cimento, 1, 252
  23. J. D. Bekenstein, 1973, Phys. Rev. D, 7, 949, 10.1103/PhysRevD.7.949 · DOI · Paper page
  24. S. W. Hawking, 1971, Phys. Rev. Lett., 26, 1344, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.1344 · DOI · Paper page
  25. W. G. Unruh, 1973, Phys. Rev. Lett., 31, 1265, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.31.1265 · DOI · Paper page
  26. W. Pauli, 1940, Phys. Rev., 58, 716, 10.1103/PhysRev.58.716 · DOI · Paper page
  27. W. G. Unruh, 1974, Phys. Rev. D, 10, 3194, 10.1103/PhysRevD.10.3194 · DOI · Paper page
  28. L. H. Ford, 1975, Phys. Rev. D, 12, 2963, 10.1103/PhysRevD.12.2963 · DOI
  29. H. Fritzsch, 1975, Nuovo Cimento, 30A, 393, 10.1007/BF02730295 · DOI · Paper page
  30. R. P. Feynman, 1958, Phys. Rev., 109, 193, 10.1103/PhysRev.109.193 · DOI · Paper page
  31. H. Fritzsch, 1975, Phys. Lett., 59B, 256, 10.1016/0370-2693(75)90040-4 · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90040-4
  32. H. Fritzsch, 1976, Phys. Lett., 62B, 72, 10.1016/0370-2693(76)90051-4 · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(76)90051-4
  33. J. D. Bekenstein, 1975, Phys. Rev. D, 9, 3292, 10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3292 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 557

Metadata

Authors
Page, D. N.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1976-12-15
Volume
14
Issue
12
Pages
3260-3273
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111197042
Cited by
557
References
4
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Particle emission rates from a black hole. II. Massless particles from a rotating hole. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.14.3260
The paper
Page, D. N. (1976). Particle emission rates from a black hole. II. Massless particles from a rotating hole. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.14.3260

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.