Cited by 665Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Origin of structure in the Universe

Halliwell, J. J., Hawking, S. W.·1985·Physical Review D

Abstract

It is assumed that the Universe is in the quantum state defined by a path integral over compact four-metrics. This can be regarded as a boundary condition for the wave function of the Universe on superspace, the space of all three-metrics and matter field configurations on a three-surface. We extend previous work on finite-dimensional approximations to superspace to the full infinite-dimensional space. We treat the two homogeneous and isotropic degrees of freedom exactly and the others to second order. We justify this approximation by showing that the inhomogeneous or anisotropic modes start off in their ground state. We derive time-dependent Schr\"odinger equations for each mode. The modes remain in their ground state until their wavelength exceeds the horizon size in the period of exponential expansion. The ground-state fluctuations are then amplified by the subsequent expansion and the modes reenter the horizon in the matter- or radiation-dominated era in a highly excited state. We obtain a scale-free spectrum of density perturbations which could account for the origin of galaxies and all other structure in the Universe. The fluctuations would be compatible with observations of the microwave background if the mass of the scalar field that drives the inflation is ${10}^{14}$ GeV or less.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.31.1777

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unlike standard WKB derivations, our assumptions do not require the clock to be large or massive, so non-clock degrees can be more than a small perturbation and the clock need not have nearly zero energy.

    “In particular, in contrast to standard derivations [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] of evolution through the use of the WKB approximation, our assumptions do not imply that the clock is large or massive so that the non-clock degrees of freedom may, in this approach, represent more than a small perturbation and the clock need not be in a state with nearly zero energy †.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halliwell, J. J., & Hawking, S. W.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1985-04-15
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
1777-1791
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017483000
Cited by
665
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
FWCI
30.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
wave function of the universe, superspace, time-dependent Schrödinger equation, inflation (cosmology), galaxy formation, cosmic microwave background, scalar field mass, horizon crossing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review