Almost ideal clocks in quantum cosmology: a brief derivation of time
Open accessAbstract
A formalism for quantizing time reparametrization invariant dynamics is considered and applied to systems which contain an `almost ideal clock'. Previously, this formalism was successfully applied to the Bianchi models and, while it contains no fundamental notion of `time' or `evolution', the approach does contain a notion of correlations. Using correlations with the almost ideal clock to introduce a notion of time, we derive the complete formalism of external time quantum mechanics. The explicit relation between the physical Hilbert space and the usual Hilbert space for a system with an external time is also derived and the limit of an ideal clock is found to be closely associated with the Klein - Gordon inner product and the Newton - Wigner formalism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 24 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
The factorization H0 = Hp ⊗ Hc is not independent of the parameter time t.
“In general, the decomposition H 0 = H p ⊗ t H c will depend on a choice of parameter time t.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Except near a turning point, q_c(t) is roughly q_c(0)+n, with n the integer count of left-turning-point visits by q since t=0.
“Thus, unless q is near a turning point, q c (t) ∼ = q c (0)+n where n is the (integer) number of times that q has reached its left turning point since t = 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The ambiguity of the pendulum as a clock is removed by coupling it to a counter that increments each complete oscillation.
- The authors state this as an assumption: V(q) has no more than a single critical point, and if it exists it is a global minimum.
- Findingreasoning
To leading order in p_c, the A±τ,n operators are symmetric on H_aux.
“Thus, the A ± τ,n are symmetric on H aux to lowest order in p c .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The expectation value of Aτ in a physical state equals 2πħ times an auxiliary inner product involving θ(P)√P χ0 τ A √P θ(P).
“ψ|A τ |ψ phys = 2πh ψ|θ(P ) √ P χ 0 τ A √ P θ (P )|ψ aux (4.5)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
When A is constructed from non-clock variables, A_{τ+δ} is e^{iδPτ} Aτ e^{-iδPτ} multiplied by (1+O(ε)+O(h)).
“A τ +δ = e iδP τ A τ e -iδP τ (1 + O ( ) + O (h))”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The clock coordinate is far from classical turning points so that classical q(t) is single-valued.
- The authors state this as an assumption: |p_c| is small in the sense that only states with spectral support in P_c concentrated where p_c << E are considered, E being the splitting between energy levels of H_p.
- Findingreasoning
[Aτ,Bτ] equals ([A,B])τ when evaluated between states in which the clocks behave semiclassically.
“Since, by construction, (4.4) is independent of the choice of n(t), it follows that [A τ , B τ ] = ([A, B]) τ when evaluated between two states in which the clocks behave semiclassically.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The formalism and WKB approximation give equation (4.3) for the matrix elements of -ih∂Aτ/∂τ.
“-ih n , p c , -E(n , p c ), a ∂ ∂τ A τ n, p c , -E(n, p c ), a phys = (E -E) n , p c, -E(n , p c ), a |A τ |n, p c , -E(n, p c ), a phys (4.3)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The clock coordinate is far from classical turning points so that classical q(t) is single-valued.
- The authors state this as an assumption: |p_c| is small in the sense that only states with spectral support in P_c concentrated where p_c << E are considered, E being the splitting between energy levels of H_p.
- Findingcitation
Corrections to (4.12) vanish when V(Q)=0.
“From section 4.2 of [1], it follows that any corrections to (4.12) vanish when V (Q) = 0.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Marolf D, 1995, Class. Quantum Grav. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
A homogeneous comoving fleet of noninteracting metric-based clocks in a homogeneous spacetime is described by the constraint e^{3α}P+H1, not by the form (3.1).
“In particular, we show in this appendix that a homogeneous comoving fleet of noninteracting such clocks in a homogeneous spacetime is described by a constraint of the form e 3α P + H 1 and not of the form (3.1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The clocks in the fleet are evenly distributed with respect to the metric on each spatial slice.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The clock fleet is comoving, with its 4-velocity proportional to the normal to the family of slices.
- Findingreasoning
φ|1lτ|ψ_phys = <φ;τ|ψ;τ>_H1.
“Note that (4.12) may also be written as φ|1l τ |ψ phys = φ; τ|ψ; τ H 1 , (4.13)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The commutator [Pτ,1lτ] vanishes.
“We may calculate the commutator of the existence operator with the time translation generator as [P τ , 1l τ ] = √ -2H 1 -2V (τ ) τ , 1l τ and, since √ -2H 1 -2V (τ ), 1l = 0, this expression vanishes by the result just derived.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
If the state has a reasonably well-defined pendulum momentum p, then ψ|[-H1,A]|ψ = p ψ|sqrt(-2H1-2V(τ)),A|ψ.
“so that, if the state |ψ has a reasonably well defined value p of the pendulum momentum P , this is just ψ|[-H 1 , A]|ψ = p ψ| √ -2H 1 -2V (τ ), A |ψ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Equation (4.6) would describe a pure state except for the factor p_c|χ0|p_c.
“In fact, (4.6) would describe a pure state except for the factor p c |χ 0 |p c .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In the small counter-coupling limit, p_c|χ0|p_c is essentially one where ψ is nonzero, so ρ(τ) effectively describes a pure state.
“Since p c |χ 0 |p c is a distribution of unit height and width 2h/ , this factor is essentially one in (4.6) when ψ(n, E, a) is nonzero and ρ(τ ) effectively describes a pure state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The final Hamiltonian is sqrt(-2H1-2V(τ)) rather than -H1.
“Indeed, where we would expect to find -H 1 as the Hamiltonian in (4.11), we instead find √ -2H 1 -2V (τ ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
When H1=g_ij P⊥i P⊥j with a constant negative definite metric, (4.10) holds exactly for A=Q_i⊥.
“When H 1 = g ij P ⊥ i P ⊥ j with g ij a constant negative definite D Marolf metric, direct calculation as in section 4.2 of [1] shows that (4.10) holds exactly for A = Q i ⊥ as well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Marolf D, 1995, Class. Quantum Grav. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
At lowest order in h, the matrix element τ|P^k θ(P)|n;p_c is (2E(n,p_c)-2V(τ))^{k/2} times τ|n;p_c^+.
“To lowest order in h, we have τ |P k θ(P )|n; p c = (2E(n, p c ) -2V (τ )) k/2 τ |n; p c + from (3.9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The clock coordinate is far from classical turning points so that classical q(t) is single-valued.
- Findingreasoning
The map A→Aτ preserves the equal-time algebraic structure of external time quantum mechanics to lowest order in ħ.
“Thus, to this accuracy the map τ : A → A τ preserves the entire equal time algebraic structure of external time quantum mechanics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Evolution in the parameter τ is unitary, apart from convergence and domain issues for Pτ and Aτ.
“Since P τ is symmetric on H aux , we have shown that evolution in the parameter τ is unitary, modulo issues of convergence of the integrals defining P τ and A τ and of the domain of definition of P τ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
|ψ;τ satisfies the Schrödinger equation with Hamiltonian sqrt(-2H1-2V(τ)).
“The state |ψ; τ satisfies ih ∂ ∂τ |ψ; τ = -2H 1 -2V (τ ) |ψ; τ (4.11)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
For functions A and B of non-clock canonical variables and states satisfying the approximation scheme, the matrix elements of [Aτ,Bτ] equal those of ([A,B])τ times (1+O(ħ)).
“In general, we verify that φ|[A τ , B τ ]|ψ = φ|([A, B]) τ |ψ (1 + O (h)) for A = A(Q i ⊥ , P ⊥ j ) and B = B(Q i ⊥ , P ⊥ j ) and any two states |φ and |ψ that satisfy the requirements of our approximation scheme.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The non-clock canonical coordinates and momenta satisfy the canonical commutation relations to lowest order in ħ.
“Here, we consider the algebraic structure of the operators A τ and, in particular, show that if Q i ⊥ and P ⊥ j are the canonical coordinates and momenta of the non-clock degrees of freedom, then (Q i ⊥ ) τ and (P ⊥ j ) τ satisfy the canonical commutation relations to lowest order in h.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
For two such states, φ|Aτ|ψ = <φ;τ|A|ψ;τ>.
“Similarly, for two such states |φ and |ψ , we have φ|A τ |ψ = φ; τ|A|ψ; τ .(4.10)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Weak self-interaction and weak interaction with other degrees of freedom are expected to make a generic degree of freedom approximate an ideal clock.
“In general, we expect a generic degree of freedom to approximate an ideal clock when it is weakly interacting, both with other degrees of freedom and with itself.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
A classical clock that directly tracks metric proper time at arbitrarily small spatial volumes also fails to have the needed properties.
“even classically, a clock which explicitly measures metric-based proper time for arbitrarily small spatial volumes does not possess the properties we require.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Provided the coupling is weak, how the counter is built and coupled to the pendulum is expected not to matter.
“we expect the details of its construction and coupling to the pendulum to be irrelevant so long as this coupling is weak.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Metric-defined proper-time clocks make the present approximations break down close to singularities in homogeneous models.
“for clocks that measure metric-defined proper time, our approximations always fail near a singularity in homogeneous models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because (3.9) is ε-independent, it remains usable at ε=0, as when V(q) has at most one turning point.
“On the other hand, (3.9) is independent of .As a result, (3.9) may be used even in the case where we may take = 0, such as when the potential V (q) generically has only one turning point (or none at all).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In several cosmological models, with q interpreted as the volume of a spatial hypersurface, H0 has the form H_p = 1/2 P^2 + V(Q).
“From, e.g.[20] we see that this is the case for a number of cosmological models if q represents the volume of a spatial hypersurface.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Jantzen R, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The approach reproduces the classical recollapse of suitable cosmological models at the quantum level.
“In addition, this approach captures in a quantum sense the classical recollapsing behaviour of the appropriate cosmological models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The systems under study generally admit two separate proper-time notions: one from the Hamiltonian constraint and lapse, and one from a metric.
“there will, in general, be two distinct notions of proper time.One such notion is the proper time t 2 t 1 N(t) dt associated with any system described by a Hamiltonian constraint H and lapse N while the other is whatever concept of proper time may be defined by a metric for the system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Suitable adiabatic conditions are expected to give the homogeneous mode of a real scalar field and many noninteracting clocks dynamics of the H_p = 1/2 P^2 + V(Q) form.
“Similarly, under appropriately 'adiabatic' conditions (see section 5 and the appendix) we expect that the dynamics of the homogeneous mode of a real scalar field and a fleet of noninteracting clocks should be of this form.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The almost local formalism has no basic concept of time or evolution.
“the approach of [1] (which we will refer to as the 'almost local formalism') contains no fundamental notion of time or evolution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Marolf D, 1995, Class. Quantum Grav. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The almost local formalism was successfully applied to the complicated mixmaster cosmology.
“In particular, it was successfully applied [22] to the complicated mixmaster cosmology [23].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Ryan M, 1975
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The external-time formalism is already known to follow exactly for a reparametrization-invariant system containing an ideal clock.
“For such a system, it has already been shown in [1] that the external time formalism can be derived exactly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Marolf D, 1995, Class. Quantum Grav. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Almost-ideal-clock notions for the two proper-time definitions match except at very small spatial-slice volume.
“that the notions of 'almost ideal clocks' associated with the two kinds of proper time agree unless the volume of the spatial slices is very small”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
When H_p has discrete spectrum, the link between H_phys and H_aux makes the counter essential.
“The relation of H phys to H aux will imply that the presence of the counter is crucial to this process when H p (the pendulum Hamiltonian) has a discrete spectrum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The auxiliary Hilbert space has a basis for a spectral interval [a,b] of H containing 0, and H has continuous spectrum with no point spectrum in that interval.
- Premisecitation
The need for H to have a continuous spectrum near zero forces homogeneous cosmological applications of the almost local formalism to use a constraint and lapse nontrivially linked to the ADM ones.
“the requirement that H has only a continuous spectrum near zero means (see [1,22]) that the almost local formalism can only be applied to homogeneous cosmological models by using a constraint H and lapse N which are nontrivially related to the ADM constraint and lapse.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Marolf D, 1995, Class. Quantum Grav. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [22] Ryan M, 1975
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The auxiliary Hilbert space has a basis for a spectral interval [a,b] of H containing 0, and H has continuous spectrum with no point spectrum in that interval.
- Premisecitation
The almost local formalism gives a complete quantization of Hamiltonian vacuum Bianchi models and similar finite-dimensional time reparametrization invariant systems.
“the almost local approach was shown in [1] to provide a complete quantization of Hamiltonian vacuum Bianchi models (see, e.g.[19][20][21]) and of similar finite-dimensional time reparametrization invariant systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Marolf D, 1995, Class. Quantum Grav. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
If the clock measured metric-defined proper time and is coupled as in [1] or [22], the system would be described by 0=e^{3α}H0+H1 instead of (3.2).
“Had the clock instead measured metric-defined proper time (assuming that it is coupled to the description of the gravitational field used in [1] or [22]), our system would be described (see the appendix) by a constraint of the form 0 = e 3α H 0 + H 1 (5.2) instead of by (3.2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Marolf D, 1995, Class. Quantum Grav. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [22] Ryan M, 1975
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The clock is coupled to the description of the gravitational field used in [1] or [22] when considering metric-defined proper time.
- Interpretationreasoning
Together with unitary evolution, this preservation extends to all Heisenberg operators and the Hamiltonian sqrt(-2H1-2V(τ)) to this order.
“Together with the unitary evolution derived in section 4.1, this in fact implies preservation to this order of the algebraic structure associated with all Heisenberg operators and the Hamiltonian √ -2H 1 -2V (τ ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The states |ψ;τ = σ_τ θ(P)√P η|ψ have the usual interpretation as probability-density amplitudes.
“It is the states |ψ; τ = σ τ θ(P ) √ P η|ψ that have the usual interpretation as amplitudes for the probability”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A clock measuring proper time in a state-independent way is not fundamental to deriving unitary evolution, the canonical commutation relations, or the Hilbert space structure.
“Thus, from the above results and the facts that our approximations are exact for a system of free particles and that section 4.1 and (4.12) are exact whenever the clock is a free particle, we may conclude that the use of a clock which measures proper time in a state-independent way is not fundamental to a derivation of unitary evolution, the canonical commutation relations, or the well-known Hilb”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The symmetry of Pτ on H_phys makes (4.1) a unitary evolution in the clock time τ.
“Since, as was noted in section 3.1, P τ defines a symmetric operator on H phys , it follows that (4.1) describes unitary evolution in the clock time τ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The clock coordinate is far from classical turning points so that classical q(t) is single-valued.
- The authors state this as an assumption: |p_c| is small in the sense that only states with spectral support in P_c concentrated where p_c << E are considered, E being the splitting between energy levels of H_p.
- Interpretationreasoning
Repeated occurrences of b(t)=τ make convergence of (2.5) delicate, requiring the almost-ideal-clock definition to account for the classical trajectories.
“However, when b(t) takes this value many times the convergence of (2.5) becomes a subtle issue so that our definition of an almost ideal clock below must pay due attention to the corresponding classical solutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Wheeler-DeWitt wavefunctions solving H|ψ>=0 are not the usual probability amplitudes; they require a Newton-Wigner/Klein-Gordon interpretation.
“The main consequence of (4.12) is to show that, in contrast to the suggestions of [33,34] the wavefunctions q ⊥ , q, q c |ψ which solve the 'Wheeler-DeWitt equation' q ⊥ , q, q c |H |ψ = 0 do not correspond to the usual probability amplitudes, but must instead be interpreted using constructions like those associated with the Newton-Wigner operators and the Klein-Gordon inner product.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Brown J D, 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The difference from the usual Hamiltonian results from dispersion.
“This is a result of the above mentioned dispersion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
|ψ;τ can be interpreted as a Schrödinger-picture state in H_ext with Hamiltonian sqrt(-2H1-2V(τ)).
“so that we may interpret |ψ; τ as a Schrödinger picture state in H ext ∼ = H 1 with Hamiltonian √ -2H 1 -2V (τ ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Equation (4.6) defines a map from physical states to Schrödinger-picture density matrices in external time quantum mechanics.
“Thus, (4.6) defines a map from states in H phys to density matrices in the Schrödinger picture of external time quantum mechanics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The metric-based and lapse-based notions of an almost ideal clock agree when e^{3α} can be treated as an adiabatic factor.
“However, the metric-based and lapse-based notions of an almost ideal clock will agree when e 3α may be treated as an adiabatic factor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Up to constant factors, the physical inner product in the ideal clock limit is the positive-frequency part of the Klein-Gordon inner product.
“Note that we arrived at a Schrödinger picture description due to the implicit mapping of the operator A τ to the operator A(t = 0) in (4.5) and ( 4.10 and, since 1l τ = 1l in our approximation, we see that up to constant factors the inner product on H phys in the ideal clock limit is the positive frequency part of the familiar Klein-Gordon inner product †.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The operators from [1] represent an average of A over times where B=τ, including cases where b(t) hits τ repeatedly.
“The associated physical operators describe a certain sort of average over 'the values of the quantity A(t) at the times for which B(t) = τ ', even when the corresponding classical quantity b(t) may take on the given value τ more than once along a trajectory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Marolf D, 1995, Class. Quantum Grav. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Conservation of existence does not follow directly from unitarity alone.
“Note that while the same calculation (4.2) which showed the unitarity of evolution allowed us to derive conservation of existence (∂1l τ /∂τ = 0), this result does not follow directly from unitarity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Conservation of probability is an explicit consequence of conservation of existence.
“Finally, by differentiating both sides of (4.13) with respect to τ , we see that conservation of probability (that is, of the right-hand side) is an explicit consequence of conservation of existence on the left.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Conservation of existence follows from a reasonable time-translation generator and the usual algebraic structure of Marolf theory.
“That is, conservation of existence follows from the presence of a reasonable generator of time translations and from the usual algebraic structure of the D Marolf theory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The two notions of an almost ideal clock agree for large spatial volumes.
“Thus, these two notions of an almost ideal clock agree for large spatial volumes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The usual external time formalism should not be expected to hold for a metric-based clock near a spacetime singularity.
“In this way it follows that we should not expect the usual external time formalism to hold for a metric-based clock near a spacetime singularity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The condition implies that the 3-volume V of a homogeneous slice should satisfy V ≫ l_p^3 m_p/M.
“Inserting the appropriate dimensional factors, this condition says that the 3-volume V of a homogeneous slice should satisfy V ℓ 3 p m p /M where m p and ℓ p”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 26
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 5
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe normalization of |p_c is ε-dependent and becomes divergent at ε=0.
“Note that the normalization of |p c is -dependent and that, in fact, (3.8) diverges at = 0.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAt p_c=p_c the matrix element p_c|χ_a|p_c is 1, and it decays with width 2/h.
“which is 1 at p c = p c and decays away from p c = p c with a width of 2/h .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe commutator of Q_c with ∂Q(t)/∂t has order p_c and is negligible.
“Note that the commutator of Q c with ∂Q(t)/∂t is of order p c and so negligible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningClassically, the counter coordinate moves by ε each pendulum swing and remains nearly constant when |q-q0(E)| is much larger than λ.
“in the classical version of this system, (3.3) is constructed so that the counter coordinate q c advances a distance with each oscillation of the pendulum but is essentially constant when |qq 0 (E)| λ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: V(q) has no more than a single critical point, and if it exists it is a global minimum.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor conserved clock momentum, A_{τ+δ}=e^{iδP} Aτ e^{-iδP}, yielding exact unitary evolution.
“Using this property, a brief study of the observables A τ defined by (3.4) shows that A τ +δ = e iδP A τ e -iδP and we have exact unitary evolution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationWhen V(Q)=0, the WKB approximation is exact and P θ(P)|ψ = sqrt(-H1) θ(P)|ψ.
“However, when V (Q) = 0 the WKB approximation is exact and P θ (P )|ψ = √ -H 1 θ(P )|ψ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningWhen [P,H]=0, the clock momentum is conserved, P(t)=P is constant, and it defines a physical operator.
“This occurs when the clock momentum P is conserved ([P , H ] = 0) so that P (t) = P is independent of t and defines a physical operator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningTo this approximation the existence operator 1lτ equals the identity, and therefore ∂1lτ/∂τ=0.
“Thus, the 'existence' operator 1l τ is the identity to this approximation and, in particular, ∂1l τ /∂τ = 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: |p_c| is small in the sense that only states with spectral support in P_c concentrated where p_c << E are considered, E being the splitting between energy levels of H_p.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationWhen V(Q)=0 and H1=g_ij P⊥i P⊥j with a negative definite constant metric, (Q_i⊥)+τ and (P⊥_j)+τ are the usual positive-frequency Newton-Wigner operators and satisfy the canonical commutation relations exactly.
“While it does not follow from the above argument, the results of section 4.2 of [1] show that when V (Q) = 0 and H 1 = ij g ij P ⊥ i P ⊥ h (for any negative definite constant metric g ij ) the (Q i ⊥ ) + τ and the (P ⊥ j ) + τ are just the usual positive frequency Newton-Wigner operators and so satisfy the canonical commutation relations exactly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Marolf D, 1995, Class. Quantum Grav. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningIt is possible that ih∂1lτ/∂τ = [1lτ,P] is nonzero.
“Note also that ih∂1l τ /∂τ = [1l τ , P ] may not vanish †.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingreasoningFrom (2.6) and p_c small, P^mτ acting on |n,p_c,-E(n,p_c),a gives (2E(n,p_c)-2V(τ))^{m/2} times that state to the working accuracy, exactly when V=0.
“it follows from (2.6) and the assumption that p c 1 that P m τ |n, p c , -E(n, p c ), a = (2E(n, p c ) -2V (τ )) m/2 |n, p c , -E(n, p c ), a (4.2)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: |p_c| is small in the sense that only states with spectral support in P_c concentrated where p_c << E are considered, E being the splitting between energy levels of H_p.
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoningρ(τ)=|ψ;τ><ψ;τ| with |ψ;τ=σ_τ θ(P)√P η|ψ, yielding ψ|Aτ|ψ = <ψ;τ|A|ψ;τ>.
“We may then write ρ(τ ) = |ψ; τ ψ; τ | where |ψ; τ = σ τ θ(P ) √ P η|ψ (4.9) so that we have derived ψ|A τ |ψ = ψ; τ|A|ψ; τ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAτ Bτ equals (AB)τ to leading order in ħ, so the full algebra of external time quantum mechanics is reproduced to this order.
“Finally, we note that the arguments applied to the type I terms above can also be used to show that A τ B τ = (AB) τ to leading order in h so that, to this order, the full algebra associated with external time quantum mechanics has been reproduced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningOn the physical Hilbert space, the commutator of Pτ with Aτ equals -iħ times the τ derivative of Aτ, which verifies the evolution law (4.1).
“Thus, we have [P τ , A τ ] = -ih∂A τ /∂τ on H phys , verifying the evolution law (4.1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningWhen [A,H1]=0, φ|θ(P)A[P,τ]θ(P)|ψ=0, so (4.10) is exact.
“Thus, when [A, H 1 ] = 0, we have φ|θ(P )A[P , τ ]θ(P )|ψ = 0 so that (4.10) is exact.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhen V(q) confines q to a finite region, H_p is a pendulum, not a clock; then q specifies several possible moments, not a single moment.
“if V (q) confines q to some finite region, what H p describes is not a clock but a pendulum; that is, a part of a clock, or a clock that measures time only modulo some (possibly state dependent) period.Thus, specifying the coordinate q determines not a unique moment of time but a discrete set of such moments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenClassically, a pendulum of this kind can serve as a clock only over a chosen half-cycle.
“Even classically, such a pendulum can only be used as a clock during some agreed upon half of an oscillation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenOperators on H_phys as defined in (2.6) are independent of which t is selected.
“Since, however, the definition (2.6) of the operators on H phys is independent of the choice of t, no harm is done by choosing t = 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The auxiliary Hilbert space has a basis for a spectral interval [a,b] of H containing 0, and H has continuous spectrum with no point spectrum in that interval.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe almost local formalism supplies a positive-definite inner product on a physical Hilbert space and a complete set of symmetric quantum observables (perennials) that capture the value of A at the time Q=τ.
“it provides [1,22] a positive-definite inner product on a physical Hilbert space H phys as well as a complete set of well-defined symmetric quantum observables on this space (perennials in the language of [18]) that, in a certain sense, capture the notion of 'the value of quantity A at the point in time at which quantity Q takes a specified value τ '.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Marolf D, 1995, Class. Quantum Grav. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [22] Ryan M, 1975
Not checked in the free run.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductnone givenApproximation (3.5) is expected to be valid provided V(τ) is much smaller than E(n,p_c).
“We expect this approximation to be valid when V (τ ) E(n, p c ) ≡ (n; p c |H p c 0 |n; p c ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The clock coordinate is far from classical turning points so that classical q(t) is single-valued.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe lapse N can differ from the metric lapse and may be rescaled nontrivially.
“N may not correspond exactly to the metric-defined lapse but may be rescaled in some nontrivial way.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFor a homogeneous comoving fleet of ideal metric clocks in a homogeneous cosmology, unitarity may hold exactly while conservation of existence generally fails.
“We again recall (see the appendix) that for a homogeneous comoving fleet of ideal metric clocks in a homogeneous cosmology, unitarity may hold exactly but we will not, in general, have conservation of existence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The clocks in the fleet are evenly distributed with respect to the metric on each spatial slice.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The clock fleet is comoving, with its 4-velocity proportional to the normal to the family of slices.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn the ideal clock limit, Aτ become positive-frequency Newton-Wigner operators, and the approach agrees with Wald [32].
“Similarly, the operators A τ become the positive frequency Newton-Wigner operators in the ideal clock limit and, in this limit, our approach will agree with that of Wald [32].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Liboff R, 1980
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf the square-root argument turns negative, the approximations break down and the pendulum should not be expected to serve well as a clock.
“In this regime, the approximations considered are not valid and, from general arguments, we have no reason to expect that our pendulum should function well as a clock.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe adiabatic approximation should hold when condition (5.3) holds, which is expected when e^{3α} is large.
“Thus, the adiabatic approximation should hold when Ṗ / α P .Using h Ȧ ∝ [A, NH ] and the fact that H is typically of a form (see [1,22]) such that [α, H ] = hP α , this condition is V (Q) P α e 3α P (5.3) which we may expect to hold when e 3α is large.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Marolf D, 1995, Class. Quantum Grav. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [22] Ryan M, 1975
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningReal clocks are used only insofar as they measure proper time and agree, i.e., to the extent that dispersion can be neglected.
“In practice, real clocks are only used to the extent that they measure proper time and thus agree with each other; that is, to the extent that the dispersion above may be neglected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe entire derivation used only the approximations of section 3, namely the ideal limit of an almost ideal clock from section 3.1.
“Recall that the entire derivation followed using only the approximations of section 3 that we have an ideal limit of an almost ideal clock as described in 3.1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUnlike standard WKB derivations, our assumptions do not require the clock to be large or massive, so non-clock degrees can be more than a small perturbation and the clock need not have nearly zero energy.
“In particular, in contrast to standard derivations [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] of evolution through the use of the WKB approximation, our assumptions do not imply that the clock is large or massive so that the non-clock degrees of freedom may, in this approach, represent more than a small perturbation and the clock need not be in a state with nearly zero energy †.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAt ε=0 the spectrum of H0 is continuous, and WKB states normalized by (3.9) obey E|E=δ(E-E); hence counter-free results apply at ε=0.
“In this case, the spectrum of H 0 is already continuous and, while the label n is now inappropriate, the WKB states normalized as in (3.9) satisfy E|E = δ(E -E ), so that all results below which do not explicitly involve the counter may also be used in this case with = 0.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningP and Pτ = P 1lτ differ unless 1lτ=1l, and that equality fails in interesting systems.
“However, P and P τ = P 1l τ (where 1l τ is also defined by (3.4)) are different operators unless we have 1l τ = 1l which, as the appendix describes, is not the case for interesting such systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe complete formalism of [1] allowed addressing unitary evolution in the physical inner product and deriving the complete map from the physical Hilbert space to the external time quantum mechanics Hilbert space.
“In addition, the complete formalism of [1] has allowed a more extensive treatment than was previously possible-we were able to address the issue of unitary evolution in the physical inner product and to derive the complete map from the physical Hilbert space to the corresponding Hilbert space of external time quantum mechanics ‡.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Marolf D, 1995, Class. Quantum Grav. source
Not checked in the free run.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The auxiliary Hilbert space has a basis for a spectral interval [a,b] of H containing 0, and H has continuous spectrum with no point spectrum in that interval.
“Precisely, we assume that the Hilbert space H aux has a basis {|n, E : n ∈ Z, E ∈ [a, b]} for the part of H aux corresponding to some spectral interval [a, b] of H with 0 ∈ [a, b].”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The unphysical decoupled-clock constraint can be approximated by systems differing only by terms treatable adiabatically or perturbatively.
“While this situation is unphysical, we assume that it may in turn be approximated by systems which differ from (3.2) only by terms that may be treated adiabatically or in perturbation theory.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The clock coordinate is far from classical turning points so that classical q(t) is single-valued.
“For such systems, we must work in the approximation that the clock coordinate q is far from the classical turning points so that the classical q(t) is a single-valued function of time.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The ambiguity of the pendulum as a clock is removed by coupling it to a counter that increments each complete oscillation.
“Following the model of a grandfather clock, we will assume that this ambiguity is removed by coupling the pendulum to some counter which increments with each complete oscillation.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
V(q) has no more than a single critical point, and if it exists it is a global minimum.
“where we have assumed that V (q) has no more than a single critical point and that this point (if it exists) is a global minimum.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
|p_c| is small in the sense that only states with spectral support in P_c concentrated where p_c << E are considered, E being the splitting between energy levels of H_p.
“First, we assume that | p c | is small in the sense that we consider only states |ψ ∈ H phys whose spectral support in P c is concentrated in the region with p c E, where E is the splitting between the energy levels of H p on which the physical 'state' |ψ ∈ H aux is concentrated.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
For a chosen pendulum position τ, for each eigenvalue E of H0 either |τ - q_t| >> h/√E for any solution V(q_t)=E or the corresponding projection of |ψ is negligible.
“Choosing some pendulum position τ , we assume that for each eigenvalue E of H 0 either |τ -q t | h/ √ E for any solution of V (q t ) = E or that the corresponding projection of |ψ is negligible.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The width λ in (3.3) is large (λ >> h/√E) so that the turning point need not be defined too precisely.
“We also assume that the width λ in (3.3) is large (λ h/ √ E) so that the notion of a turning point need not be defined too precisely.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The projection of |ψ to the subspace where Q=τ has negligible projections onto eigenvalues 0 and of Q_c so the counter may be read clearly.
“Finally, we ask that the projection of |ψ to the subspace where Q = τ have negligible projections onto the eigenvalues 0 and of Q c so that the counter may be read clearly.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The clocks in the fleet are evenly distributed with respect to the metric on each spatial slice.
“such that the clocks are evenly distributed with respect to the metric on each slice.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The clock fleet is comoving, with its 4-velocity proportional to the normal to the family of slices.
“Let us also assume that the clocks are comoving in the sense that the 4-velocity field U α of the clock fleet is proportional to the normal field n α of the family of slices t .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The clock is coupled to the description of the gravitational field used in [1] or [22] when considering metric-defined proper time.
“Had the clock instead measured metric-defined proper time (assuming that it is coupled to the description of the gravitational field used in [1] or [22]), our system would be described”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In [15], the authors introduce an algebra of observables for complex Ashtekar gravity and the Maxwell field coupled to fermions, with fermions coupling by insertions at endpoints of Wilson lines, and compute the Poisson and commutator algebra of this overcomplete set of gauge invariant observables.
“in [15] the authors introduce an algebra of observables for complex Ashtekar gravity and the Maxwell field coupled to fermions. The fermions couple by making insertions at the endpoints of Wilson lines. The authors compute the Poisson and commutator algebra of this (overcomplete) set of gauge invariant observables.”
From Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [15]
The authors of [21] formulated a kinematical framework for diffeomorphism invariant theories of fermions coupling to real-valued Ashtekar gravity and other gauge fields, defining a natural inner product by the Berezin integral, showing a class of operators are well-defined, and indicating how to define diffeomorphism invariant distributions involving fermions.
“The authors of [21] have followed this trend and formulated a kinematical framework for diffeomorphism invariant theories of fermions coupling to real-valued Ashtekar gravity and other gauge fields. That is, they define a natural inner product by means of the Berezin integral, show that a certain class of the operators defined in [15] are well-defined on it and indicate how to define diffeomorphis”
From Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [15]
Difficulties with the awkward reality structure of the fermion field make the framework of [21] incomplete: most interesting operators defined in [15] do not have an adjoint on the Hilbert space defined, and this prevented proving that their inner product is selected by the classical reality conditions.
“However, certain difficulties having to do with the awkward reality structure of the fermion field make their framework incomplete in the sense that most of the interesting operators defined in [15] do not have an adjoint on the Hilbert space defined. In particular, this prevented the authors from proving that their inner product is selected by the classical reality conditions.”
From Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [15]
The result that the inner product is uniquely selected by reality conditions can be established at the non-gauge-invariant level, without dealing with complicated path observables defined in [15,21].
“We do not need to deal with the complicated path observables defined in [15, 21] in order to establish this result because we can prove everything at the non-gauge-invariant level.”
From Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [15]
Cites
Quantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canonical Theory
DeWitt, B. S. (1967) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.160.1113 · Cited by 3,385 · see citing works
Origin of structure in the Universe
Halliwell, J. J., & Hawking, S. W. (1985) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.31.1777 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Evolution without evolution: Dynamics described by stationary observables
Page, D. N., & Wootters, W. K. (1983) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.27.2885 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
What is observable in classical and quantum gravity?
Rovelli, C. (1991) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/8/2/011 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
TCP, quantum gravity, the cosmological constant and all that...
Banks, T. (1985) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90020-3 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Time in quantum gravity: An hypothesis
Rovelli, C. (1991) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.442 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Quantum Limitations of the Measurement of Space-Time Distances
Salecker, H., & Wigner, E. P. (1958) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.109.571 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Relativistic Invariance and Quantum Phenomena
Wigner, E. P. (1957) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.29.255 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Operator ordering and the flatness of the universe
Hawking, S. W., & Page, D. N. (1986) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90478-5 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Quantum mechanics without time: A model
Rovelli, C. (1990) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.42.2638 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Relativistic quantum mechanics of supersymmetric particles
Marc Henneaux, A., & Teitelboim, C. (1982) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(82)90216-0 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Quantum observables and recollapsing dynamics
Marolf, D. (1995) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/12/5/011 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum linearization instabilities of de Sitter spacetime. II
Higuchi, A. (1991) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/8/11/010 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Quantum cosmological singularities
Gotay, M. J., & Demaret, J. (1983) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.28.2402 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Quantum kinematics of spacetime. II. A model quantum cosmology with real clocks
Hartle, J. B. (1988) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.38.2985 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Density matrix of the Universe
Page, D. N. (1986) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.34.2267 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Quantum linearization instabilities of de Sitter spacetime. I
Higuchi, A. (1991) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/8/11/009 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
MINISUPERSPACES: OBSERVABLES AND QUANTIZATION
Ashtekar, A., TATE, R., & UGGLA, C. (1993) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271893000039 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Proposal for solving the ‘‘problem of time’’ in canonical quantum gravity
Wald, R. M. (1993) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.48.r2377 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Observables and a Hilbert space for Bianchi IX
Marolf, D. M. (1995) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/12/6/010 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationLinearized gravity in de Sitter spacetime as a representation of SO(4, 1)
Higuchi, A. (1991) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/8/11/011 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Linearized quantum gravity in flat space with toroidal topology
Higuchi, A. (1991) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/8/11/012 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
The Spectral Analysis Inner Product for Quantum GravityPreprint
Marolf, D. M. (1994) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9409036 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationTime, measurement and information loss in quantum cosmologyPreprint
Smolin, L. (1993) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9301016 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Lapchinsky V G, 1979, Acta. Phys. Pol., 10, 1041
- Jantzen R, 1979, 64, 211
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum nature of the big bang: Improved dynamics
Ashtekar, A., Pawlowski, T., & Singh, P. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.084003 · Cited by 1,147 · see citing works
Quantum nature of the big bang: An analytical and numerical investigation
Ashtekar, A., Pawlowski, T., & Singh, P. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.124038 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/6/006 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Kamiński, W., Lewandowski, J., & Pawłowski, T. (2009) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/24/245016 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Marolf, D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marolf, Donald
- ORCID
- Marolf, Donald
- Venue
- Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1995-10-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2469-2486
- ISSN
- 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6382
- OpenAlex
- W2131407107
- Semantic Scholar
- 5f12f663ef00f78d1a6f59f6212c50d1acb6166c
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (9008502)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- quantum cosmology, time reparametrization invariance, physical Hilbert space, Bianchi models, correlation, quantum time
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review