Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 575

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Black-hole thermodynamics and the Euclidean Einstein action

York, James W.·1986·Physical Review D

Abstract

Using the approach to black-hole thermodynamics initiated by Gibbons and Hawking, in terms of the Euclidean Einstein action, I show that the canonical ensemble with elements of radius r and temperature T(r) for hot gravity with black holes is well defined. This follows from the double valuedness of solutions of the Euclidean Einstein equation with canonical boundary conditions. One of the solutions is a locally stable hole. Its partition function is well defined and implies the entropy S=4\ensuremath{\pi}${M}^{2}$ as well as a generalized version of black-hole thermodynamics that reduces to the usual form if ${\mathrm{rM}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}. The density of states of the locally stable hole is real and nonpathological. The free energy of this hole can be negative, while that of the other (unstable) solution is always positive. Consequently, the direct nucleation of black holes from hot flat space, as proposed by Gross, Perry, and Yaffe, can be given a thermodynamically consistent description. The scaling laws for hot gravity are obtained and applied to phase transitions between hot flat space and locally stable holes. The free energy of the unstable solution forms the effective potential barrier between these phases. The ground state of the canonical ensemble is always locally stable in the semiclassical approximation. If N is the effective number of massless fields of helicity zero in hot flat space, then when either r\ensuremath{\lesssim}${N}^{1/2}$ or T\ensuremath{\gtrsim}${N}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1/2}$, hot flat space is the most probable ground state. Independently of N, if rT${<(27)}^{1/2}$(8\ensuremath{\pi}${)}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$ there can be no real black hole in the canonical ensemble.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.33.2092

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 575

Metadata

Authors
York, J. W.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1986-04-15
Volume
33
Issue
8
Pages
2092-2099
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119811657
Cited by
575
References
4
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Black-hole thermodynamics and the Euclidean Einstein action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.33.2092
The paper
York, J. W. (1986). Black-hole thermodynamics and the Euclidean Einstein action. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.33.2092

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.