The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Black-hole evaporation and ultrashort distances
Abstract
The role played by ultrahigh frequencies or ultrashort distances in the usual derivations of the Hawking effect is discussed and criticized. The question "would a black hole radiate if there were a Planck scale cutoff in the rest frame of the hole?" is posed. Guidance is sought from Unruh's fluid-flow analogue of black-hole radiation, by taking into account the atomic nature of the fluid. Two arguments for black-hole radiation are given which assume a Planck length cutoff. One involves the response of static accelerated detectors outside the horizon, and the other involves conservation of the expectation value of the stress tensor. Neither argument is conclusive, but they do strongly suggest that, in spite of reasonable doubt about the usual derivations of black-hole radiation, a "safe" derivation which avoids our ignorance of ultrashort-distance physics can likely be formulated. Remaining open questions are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Particle creation by black holes
Hawking, S. W. (1975) · Communications In Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02345020 · Cited by 13,106
HAWKING, S. W. (1974) · Nature · doi:10.1038/248030a0 · Cited by 5,669
The four laws of black hole mechanics
Bardeen, J. M., Carter, B., & Hawking, S. W. (1973) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01645742 · Cited by 3,932
Experimental Black-Hole Evaporation?
Unruh, W. G. (1981) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.46.1351 · Cited by 1,774
Trace anomalies and the Hawking effect
Christensen, S. M., & Fulling, S. A. (1977) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2088 · Cited by 701
Cited by
Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity
Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L. (1995) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00150-q · Cited by 1,365
QUANTUM GRAVITY AND MINIMUM LENGTH
GARAY, L. J. (1995) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x95000085 · Cited by 1,371
“[ 82 ]). However, this membrane would be real only for this observer at rest (its reality would be dramatically shown if this observer were too close to the membrane since its extremely high temperature would burn him to ashes).”
BackgroundBarceló, C., Liberati, S., & Visser, M. (2005) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2005-12 · Cited by 1,163
Fiber-Optical Analog of the Event Horizon
Philbin, T. G., Kuklewicz, C., Robertson, S., Hill, S., König, F., & Leonhardt, U. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1153625 · Cited by 769
Quantum Gravity in Everyday Life: General Relativity as an Effective Field Theory
Burgess, C. P. (2004) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2004-5 · Cited by 748
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacobson, T.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1991-09-15
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1731-1739
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062094012
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.