The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dirty black holes: Thermodynamics and horizon structure
Open accessAbstract
Considerable interest has recently been expressed in (static spherically symmetric) black holes in interaction with various classical matter fields (such as electromagnetic fields, dilaton fields, axion fields, Abelian Higgs fields, non-Abelian gauge fields, etc.). A common feature of these investigations that has not previously been remarked upon is that the Hawking temperature of such systems appears to be suppressed relative to that of a vacuum black hole of equal horizon area. That is, ${\mathit{kT}}_{\mathit{H}}$\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{\Elzxh}/(4\ensuremath{\pi}${\mathit{r}}_{\mathit{H}}$)==\ensuremath{\Elzxh}/ \ensuremath{\surd}4\ensuremath{\pi}${\mathit{A}}_{\mathit{H}}$. This paper will argue that this suppression is generic. Specifically, it will be shown that ${\mathit{kT}}_{\mathit{H}}$=(\ensuremath{\Elzxh}/4\ensuremath{\pi}${\mathit{r}}_{\mathit{H}}$)${\mathit{e}}_{\mathit{H}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\varphi}}(\mathit{r}}$) (1-8\ensuremath{\pi}G${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\rho}}}_{\mathit{H}}$${\mathit{r}}_{\mathit{H}}^{2}$). Here \ensuremath{\varphi}(${\mathit{r}}_{\mathit{H}}$) is an integral quantity, depending on the distribution of matter, that is guaranteed to be positive if the weak energy condition is satisfied. Several examples of this behavior will be discussed. Generalizations of this behavior to nonsymmetric nonstatic black holes are conjectured.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The four laws of black hole mechanics
Bardeen, J. M., Carter, B., & Hawking, S. W. (1973) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01645742 · Cited by 3,932
Cited by
Barceló, C., Liberati, S., & Visser, M. (2005) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2005-12 · Cited by 1,163
Self-citationUnified first law of black-hole dynamics and relativistic thermodynamics
Hayward, S. A. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/10/017 · Cited by 615
Barceló, C., Liberati, S., & Visser, M. (2011) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-3 · Cited by 598
Self-citationThermality of the Hawking flux
Visser, M. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep07(2015)009 · Cited by 41
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Visser, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1992-09-15
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2445-2451
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137393586
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dirty black holes: Thermodynamics and horizon structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.46.2445
- The paper
- Visser, M. (1992). Dirty black holes: Thermodynamics and horizon structure. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.46.2445
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.