The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environment-induced decoherence, classicality, and consistency of quantum histories
Open accessAbstract
We prove that for an open system, in the Markovian regime, it is always possible to construct an infinite number of nontrivial sets of histories that exactly satisfy the probability sum rules. In spite of being perfectly consistent, these sets manifest a very nonclassical behavior: they are quite unstable under the addition of an extra instant to the list of times defining the history. To eliminate this feature---the implications of which we discuss---and to achieve the stability that characterizes the quasiclassical domain, it is necessary to separate the instants which define the history by time intervals significantly larger than the typical decoherence time. In this case environment induced superselection is very effective. The quasiclassical domain is defined by predictably evolving perferred states, ``pointer projectors,'' which give rise to consistent preferred sets of histories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
Atom—Photon Interactions: Basic Process and Appilcations
Cohen‐Tannoudji, C., Dupont‐Roc, J., & Grynberg, G. (1998) · doi:10.1002/9783527617197 · Cited by 2,510
Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics
Griffiths, R. B. (1984) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01015734 · Cited by 1,138
On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory
Zeh, H. D. (1970) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00708656 · Cited by 1,028
Hu, B. L., Paz, J. P., & Zhang, Y. (1992) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.45.2843 · Cited by 996
Self-citationCoherent states via decoherence.
Zurek, W. H., Habib, S., & Paz, J. P. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1187 · Cited by 679
Self-citationConsistent interpretations of quantum mechanics
Omnès, R. (1992) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.64.339 · Cited by 648
Preferred States, Predictability, Classicality and the Environment-Induced Decoherence
Zurek, W. H. (1993) · Progress of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1143/ptp/89.2.281 · Cited by 525
Self-citation
Cited by
Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics
Schlosshauer, M. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.1267 · Cited by 1,443
Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical — Revisited
Zurek, W. H. (2006) · Quantum Decoherence · doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-7808-0_1 · Cited by 393
Self-citationOn the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics
Dowker, F., & Kent, A. (1996) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02183396 · Cited by 364
Arrow of time in a recollapsing quantum universe
Kiefer, C., & Zeh, H. D. (1995) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.4145 · Cited by 133
Variational consistent histories as a hybrid algorithm for quantum foundations
Arrasmith, A., Cincio, L., Sornborger, A. T., Zurek, W. H., & Coles, P. J. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11417-0 · Cited by 66
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Paz, J. P., & Zurek, W. H.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1993-09-15
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2728-2738
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105753042
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.